Ask the Car People.SM


2013 Ford Escape Gas Mileage - READ ONLY

565 messages,  Last post on May 18, 2013 at 8:42 PM

You are in the Ford Escape Forum.

What is this discussion about? Ford Escape, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), SUV

Please note the engine, AWD/FWD, type of gas you buy, and something about the type of driver you are and your driving conditions (city/highway, commuting) when you post about your mileage.

Messages Page 36 of 57

#349 of 565 Re: Vehicle mileage? [pdawg1] by pdawg1

Mar 07, 2013 (11:30 am)

Replying to: pdawg1 (Mar 07, 2013 11:05 am)
Sorry, calculations are not correct. If my Escape had 2 gallons in the tank and we put in 11, that would be a 13 gallon tank, which is what a lot of people are saying.............but it is still not 15!

#350 of 565 Re: Vehicle mileage? [pdawg1] by tinycadon

Mar 07, 2013 (11:34 am)

Replying to: pdawg1 (Mar 07, 2013 11:05 am)
Yup, that 15g tank is more like a 13g "useable" tank, there's nothing Ford can do for you. You can never use the entire 15gal, there will always be air in the tank because of the automatic fuel shut off on the gas pump. If you are able to keep getting gas into the tank after the fuel shut off engages you run the risk of ruining the emissions control system. They are just going to tell you everything is normal, and unfortunately in this case, it is.

#351 of 565 Re: Vehicle mileage? [steve_] by automelon48

Mar 07, 2013 (11:42 am)

Replying to: steve_ (Mar 07, 2013 10:58 am)
Steve
I agree that all the little things add up. I will take 50 lbs of "work stuff" out of my vehicle when it's not needed. I don't expect to save a lot of fuel by doing so, I just think it's a waste to move around extra weight for no reason.
 
My main point above, is that it is stated that a heavier driver will increase fuel consumption by 41% in the city!!!! Where does that data come from?

#352 of 565 Re: Vehicle mileage? [automelon48] by steve_ HOST

Mar 07, 2013 (2:21 pm)

Replying to: automelon48 (Mar 07, 2013 11:42 am)
Weight Watchers.

#353 of 565 Gas tank by donl1

Mar 07, 2013 (2:46 pm)

I never had a vehicle in 40+ years of ownership where I complained the gas tank was too big. And that includes pickups that had 2 tanks.

#354 of 565 Re: Not Eco [renip] by pkmoor

Mar 12, 2013 (12:52 pm)

Replying to: renip (Dec 12, 2012 6:52 pm)
Have spent some time reading these posts and have never seen so many complaints about expected vs true MPG. In CITY driving, that is.
 
We all agree that there's little or nothing wrong when taking this baby, especially the 2.0 AWD Ecoboost, out of the city. But OMG, if you're a city driver like I am (Washington, DC), even if you are not trying to be the fastest when taking off - I have become extremely careful-, you're in for a surprise: I get 13.5 MPG, run out of gas after 180-200 miles. I might as well get a parking spot where I fill up!
 
I've driven just about 5500 miles, and am thoroughly disappointed. I truly shouldn't have to scavenger for 100% gas, switch to 91/93, wonder why Ford decided to engage the All Wheel Drive at all take offs from stop, and the many other reasons folks try to explain away the fact that Ford promised good city mileage and can't deliver.
 
And please, if you are a 60/40 or 70/30 driver, we KNOW by now that you get 22.24 MPG. That's not what everyone is complaining about. So stop telling us why you love Ford so much. So you like their logo? Good for you. But it has nothing to do with the problem.
 
Anyway, my Ford is at the dealership being tested, but I'm sure it's going to be blamed on the user. That's what they do until the EPA gets on this, and they have to eat crow.
 
Anyone want to buy an almost new Escape? Got a great deal for ya.

#355 of 565 Great by dizney

Mar 12, 2013 (2:30 pm)

Glad I didnt buy the 2.0 ! Got 35.2 mpg just yesterday on my 1.6 !!!!

#356 of 565 Re: Not Eco [pkmoor] by stevedebi

Mar 12, 2013 (1:10 pm)

Replying to: pkmoor (Mar 12, 2013 12:52 pm)
"...Anyway, my Ford is at the dealership being tested, but I'm sure it's going to be blamed on the user. That's what they do until the EPA gets on this, and they have to eat crow.
  
Anyone want to buy an almost new Escape? Got a great deal for ya. "
 
If you do unload the '13, look up a 2010-2012 Escape Hybrid. I was very disappointed when they did not continue the hybrid for 2013. It gets absolutely great city mileage for an SUV.
 
On a side note, I never really understood why they engage the AWD from a cold stop. My 2008 AWD FEH does it as well. Interesting to see they carried on that design "feature".

#357 of 565 Re: Not a fuel sipper but good MPG for weight & towing ability [craign1] by pkmoor

Mar 12, 2013 (1:18 pm)

Replying to: craign1 (Mar 02, 2013 6:59 am)
Dear Craig, I have a 2.0 Titanium and drive mostly in town. Yes, I do take it out, and then the MPG is fine, not great, but fine. We are not complaining about that.
 
However, if Ford says that we should get "Up to 22 cty/30 hwy mpg", and we get 13.5 cty, then there's something WRONG with that. I challenge the EPA to actually get 22 cty. Even with 100% gas, which is unavailable in most large cities.
 
That is what we are talking about. Stay with the point we are trying to make, and don't confuse it with your Ford love affair.

#358 of 565 Re: Not a fuel sipper but good MPG for weight & towing ability [pkmoor] by stevedebi

Mar 12, 2013 (1:33 pm)

Replying to: pkmoor (Mar 12, 2013 1:18 pm)
"... However, if Ford says that we should get "Up to 22 cty/30 hwy mpg", and we get 13.5 cty, then there's something WRONG with that. I challenge the EPA to actually get 22 cty. Even with 100% gas, which is unavailable in most large cities. ..."
 
He said he is getting 21 in town, and described some of the techniques he uses to achieve that.
 
The differences in reports by various owners makes me wonder if the gas blend is vastly different in the various places.

Messages Page 36 of 57

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement