Last post on Aug 25, 2013 at 7:43 AM
You are in the Kia Rondo
What is this discussion about?
Kia Rondo, Car Buying, Wagon
#36 of 44 Re: test drove a 2014 Rondo EX [bgw]
Apr 23, 2013 (7:25 pm)
are they both 7-seater models, they would have to so you could get in the rear seats? This one I drove was a 5-seater and they did not have that feature before (my '08 model certainly didn't).
#37 of 44 What's the attraction of the 5 seater?
Apr 26, 2013 (8:37 pm)
I bought a (4-cyl) 2012 Rondo EX Premium about 6 months ago. At 17K it seems like a lot of car for the money. The major attraction for me is 7 seats in a wagon/MPV rather than minivan or SUV. The Orlando is the only other 7-seater MPV offered in Canada, but was inferior IMO.
My pet peeves with the 2012 Rondo are:
- no manual option
- overly tall, especially with rack
- turning radius only slightly smaller than the Queen Mary
- atrocious fuel consumption, highway or city. 50% above NRCan ratings on a good day.
The 2014 would seem to be an improvement on all fronts:
- manual option
- GDI + 6 speed should offer lower fuel consumption
Unfortunately, not necessarily:
- no manual option with 7 seats!
- only shortened by 1 inch, was hoping for a couple more.
- top gear ratio is not really improved, so the potential fuel consumption decline is somewhat muted. Main savings will come from 2L DI engine
On the downside with the 2014, they've added a lot of features I don't care for, and with it comes a heftier price tag. Not that I would be buying anyway, since I tend to keep my cars for 15 years.
I'm intrigued that anyone bought this car in the 5-seat configuration. To me, the Rondo is a bit of an odd vehicle that makes compromises for the sake of flexibility, with the chief benefit of allowing 7 seats. If you only need 5 seats, there are plenty of competing vehicles that don't require those compromises - better driving, better looking, more fuel efficient etc. tailored to meet those needs.
So I'm curious to know from 5-seat Rondo owners: what attracted you to the Rondo that wasn't met by another vehicle?
#38 of 44 Re: What's the attraction of the 5 seater? [gtravesty]
Apr 27, 2013 (6:06 am)
I owned a 2.4L '08 Rondo EX 5-seater for four years. One of the reasons I purchased the Rondo was the fact it had a 5-seater version, I had no need for the extra seats, much prefer the extra underfloor storage instead. At the time I looked at the Mazda 5, also considered some of the smaller SUV's like the Honda CR-V, RAV4, Escape which all came in 5-seater models, but I had no need for AWD, but the with some of the features that came standard on the Rondo there would have been a vast cost difference which I couldn't justify. I consider the Rondo a wagon, we also have a large dog and needed good room for that. The major need for this type of vehicle was the fact it was easy to get in and out (don't like dropping down into a vehicle or having to climb out) and it definitely had to be a hatchback for its versatility.
No vehicle is perfect, but you have to take the overall package into consideration. I like the driving of the Rondo and also liked the dash layout much better than the Mazda 5, also did not like the rear sliding door.
Direct competition is obviously the Mazda 5 and Orlando but also any small FWD SUV too.
The new LX model is more like the old EX model.
I found the fuel economy on my Rondo very good and had no complaints in that regard, turning radius wasn't bad either.
However, I did trade the Rondo for a 2012 Soul 4u as I was intrigued with all the features of that model (liked it when it first came out but obviously is was not available at the time I made my Rondo purchase). The Rondo was my first KIA product (was a bit nervous at the time due to past reputations) but it was unfounded and I found the Rondo very reliable and did not have a single mechanical problem, had four warranty claims which were all taken care of without any hassle or inconvenience. So I had no hesitation in purchasing another KIA product, which I did and got good value on the Rondo in trade.
My dealer has been great and get all my service maintenance done there.
The 2014 Rondo is the same height as my Soul, if you want anything lower then there is the Forte 5. The previous vehicle I had to the Rondo was a Oldsmobile Cutless Sierra which was 10" lower and 10" longer than the Rondo, but found the Rondo far more stable in strong winds than the Olds.
#39 of 44 comparison 2014 vs 2012
May 09, 2013 (1:02 pm)
May 14, 2013 (7:27 pm)
one of the new colours for the 2014 Rondo - Newport Blue
#41 of 44 the new model sales
Jul 13, 2013 (7:14 am)
this new design is paying off big-time with good sales, here is June sales and how it stacks up against its immediate competitors:
Rondo - 945 units
Mazda 5 - 233
Chev Orlando - 181
#42 of 44 Re: the new model sales [conwelpic]
Jul 16, 2013 (5:45 pm)
I test-drove a 2014 EX a few days ago. I was disappointed with it. It is noticeably smaller inside, and the 2nd row seat is so low it made me feel as if I was sitting in a Corolla. The 4 cyl sounds coarse and is surprisingly rough, though I know a 4 cyl won't be as smooth as our V6. The steering weights up oddly as speed increases, and the rough-road ride is kind of like a hobby horse, back and forth pitching. It's more of a larger Forte wagon, nothing like a 2007-2013 Rondo and that's too bad. I do hope it sells well, but it won't be to us.
Jul 22, 2013 (4:42 pm)
Hi all, could you please vote for me to win a new rondo?! It would be amazing, my name is Samantha Cook, just click the link! Thanks!
#44 of 44 Re: comparison 2014 vs 2012 [conwelpic]
Aug 25, 2013 (7:43 am)
I have always liked some of the same attributes you do on a Rondo. For me tho, I wish it had AWD and diesel option. That would be the cure for way better FE, provide the extra urge that AWD saps, and make it capable of towing a small travel trlr with a shower. These are feats that are well out of the new Rondo's element. Unfortunately, cuz having not driven one yet, I did spend some showrm time in one, and I was most impressed with two things right off...its looks, and the seats. The seats are a vast improvement over the pre 14's. In terms of support and comfort up front. I never sat in the rear yet. I also love the driving positions and the ease of ingress/egress. It is perfect in those ways.
One problem I have with Kia is their Ford type marketing of a century past...any colour you want as long as it's black, with its interiors