650 messages,
Last post on May 17, 2013 at 8:51 AM
You are in the
Ford Escape Forum.
What is this discussion about?
Ford Escape, Car Buying, Car Comparisons, SUV
#420 of 650 Ford Escape 2013 1.6L Engine Noise
by thayer_m1
Nov 26, 2012 (7:16 pm)
I recently purchased a 2013 ford escape with a 1.6L Eco Boost engine from Lundgren Motors in Eveleth, MN. There is a very annoying engine noise that is driving me crazy. The noise has a pinging or ticking sound. The noise is present at all engine RPM’s above idle and the frequency scales with engine RPM. The noise is coming from the dash/firewall on the passenger side. The noise is noticeable only from inside the car when the windows and doors are closed. I keep the radio on to drown out the noise. I’ve had the car in dealership and they inform me that this noise is normal and is coming from the fuel injection system. I’ve driven other 2013 1.6L Ford Escapes and none of them have this noise. Therefore, I’ve concluded that this “noise” is not normal. The dealership is not interested in working the issue and wants me to go away. I’ve tried to isolate the source of the noise with little luck. I did hear the noise signature on one of the fuel lines with a mechanical stethoscope. Does anyone have this same issue?
#421 of 650 Back-up Camera and Mileage
by bretcamp
Nov 27, 2012 (8:42 am)
Hello All
We've had 4 Escapes and liked them all. Considering trading in one of the older ones - already rushed to get a 2012 on another trade, but realize we'll have to bite the bullet at some point on the new version- and have two comments and two questions:
comment 1 - why the heck did they reduce the gas tank size? When you look at the range for city, combined, or highway - the extra mpg doesn't make any noticeable difference. All the ranges are within a few percent of each other. It seems like the highway mpg isn't too realistic, anyway. If you drive at 55 on NJ highways, you'll be flattened.
comment 2 - another thread has confirmed that the hatch opening height - the height from the load floor to the inside top of the hatch door frame - is shorter than the previous version. The boxiness of the previous model was one of the best features. Has anyone with a new model found the reduced hatch opening height to be an issue?
question 1 - back-up camera was included with nav system in earlier models. It's not clear if this is still the case, or whether you now have to buy the $995 parking tech package in addition to the $750 nav price. Admittedly, the nav option was more expensive in prior models, so maybe it works out the same.
question 2 - if you get the nav system, you can't get the upgraded Sony sound system?
Thanks, fellow Escapees!
#422 of 650 Re: Back-up Camera and Mileage [bretcamp]
by steve_ HOST
Nov 27, 2012 (9:11 am)
Smaller gas tanks means the car weighs a bit less and helps Ford meet CAFE mpg standards. It's not a lot of weight but it all adds up.
#423 of 650 Re: Back-up Camera and Mileage [bretcamp]
by izedaman
Nov 27, 2012 (11:42 am)
I have the nav system, it is the upgraded sony sound system with a 'sub' hehe
and when I got mine to get the camera, you had to get the parking package. I like the bliss, crosstraffic... i dont care for, and auto park i dont care for. but the camera is a must
I would love a +5 gallon tank
the hatch height... never noticed a difference from the tribute
#424 of 650 Re: Back-up Camera and Mileage [steve_]
by tinycadon
Nov 27, 2012 (11:48 am)
The new model outweighs the old model even with the smaller tank. My mixed driving range has dropped from 285-310mi with the 2010 Escape to 235-260 with the new 2013 Escape. Not only that, I religiously hand calculate my mileage and during the 1st 3 months I was getting 23.5mpg with the 2010 and now I'm getting 18.9mpg. And they were both purchased in July so temp/gas formula has nothing to do with it. For whatever this is worth???
#425 of 650 Re: 2013 Ford Escape SEL 4WD no nav [tim156]
by southtx
Nov 27, 2012 (1:07 pm)
Well, this is certainly in keeping with what Ford 'Customer Care' told me. Which was when they fix it they'll let the dealers know, but won't be making any effort to let owners know. And apparently, the dealers aren't going to tell you unless you take it in and ask (if they even know). At the very least, I would have expected some kind of Email notification from the SYNCmyRide website, but I didn't see one.
We also had the radio 'on by itself and wouldn't turn off' again last weekend . And like a few times before, it stayed on with the vehicle shut down and the doors opened (which should 'kill' the designated power delay however long that is).
Changing the subject a bit, I've noticed a LOT of wind noise at the windows... much more than any other vehicle I can remember. Haven't mentioned that to the dealer yet, but I will when we take it in for them to isolate a 'wet' problem they noticed during an oil change.
#426 of 650 Re: Back-up Camera and Mileage [tinycadon]
by steve_ HOST
Nov 27, 2012 (3:17 pm)
How many miles on yours now?
Winter-blend gas can make your mileage go down. Three and a half mpg seems like a bit much though.
#427 of 650 Re: Back-up Camera and Mileage [steve_]
by explorerx4
Nov 27, 2012 (4:50 pm)
My wife has a '13 AWD 2.0 with about 1750 miles on it.
It has averaged just over 22 mpg in the month and a half she has owned it.
I checked the mileage for her '09 over the same period and it was about 20.8, although it had about 8k on it by then.
That must have been a cold spell here in the northeast back in '09 because checking the mileage i got in the '02 Explorer, it could barely keep it's head above 13 mpg for the same period.
I was averaging close to 16 mpg with it before November this year and my last couple of tanks have been around 14.5.
#428 of 650 Re: Back-up Camera and Mileage [steve_]
by tinycadon
Nov 27, 2012 (4:52 pm)
2,500 now, and I compared it to the 1st 2,500 with the 2010 Escape & they were both bought in July so the winter blend shouldn't have a greater effect on 1 over the other.
The Hwy mileage was a different story, the 2010 was 27.4 and the 2013 was 30.6
IMO the turbo KILLS the mpgs in mixed driving more than a N/A engine.
#429 of 650 Re: Back-up Camera and Mileage [tinycadon]
by steve_ HOST
Nov 27, 2012 (5:05 pm)
Well, I think it's possible for different cars, even the same model and engine, to have different mpg results. Otherwise there wouldn't be much reason for this discussion, lol.
Some people get good mpg from the first tank while others take 10,000 miles or more for the mpg to settle in. I wouldn't get too worried until another 6 or 8 tanks.