Last post on Nov 29, 2013 at 3:12 PM
You are in the Hyundai Elantra
What is this discussion about?
Hyundai Elantra, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Hatchback, Sedan
#184 of 774 Re: Hyundai Elantra Real World MPG 2012 [tenpin288]
Feb 03, 2012 (12:39 pm)
Interesting...When I had a detailed conversation with the Service Rep at my local dealership discussing the issue of lower mpg than advertised, he asked about driving habits. Well, living here in Phoenix, AZ everyone drives like bats outta hell and while the posted speed limit is 65, the average speed on the highways is 70-75, sometimes 80 if you get in the wrong lane. With that said, he mentioned that with the newer aerodynamic improvements, speeds in excess of 70 causes more downforce on the vehicle and can cause a decrease in mpgs. Plausible to say the least, but how do you explain my increase in fuel economy with the 2012 Accent that I now drive?
At first, I drove the Elantra exclusively and then after a bout of guilt over having the new car in the house (not to mention my wife's constant boo-boo lip), I gave it up and let her have it. I know her driving style is more cautious than I (albeit her brake usage is a bit excessive), and even with her now driving the Elantra, the mpgs have not improved. Currently, we have about 6000 miles on it and again, no decent improvement. Here's a kicker though, the manual states that the oil should be changed every 7500 miles, but according to the dealership, it's still 3500. They like to call it "extreme conditions maintenance". It's wintertime now, no 100 degree temps, so explain why we are still in extreme conditions? Beh, I digress.
Another oddity with the Elantra's info panel. Everytime gas is replaced in the tank, a full reset of the counts is done (i.e. trip, mpg avg, ETA, range). I noticed before and I assume it still happens that the range goes down every time a fill up is done. I know that the range is supposed to indicate the amount of miles you can drive on the tank...shouldn't that stay consistent? Now, before someone chimes in with the obvious an answer of "well you may be approaching the time to change the oil", this has been occuring ever since I got the car, meaning that when the car was brand spanking new, the range would decline.
I cannot seem to shake the feeling that perhaps the computer is not reporting correctly. If that were the case, it's an easy fix and I would be a happy camper if after being fixed, the reports would be more of what I would expect out of the performance of the vehicle.
#185 of 774 Re: MT Elantra & Other Interesting MPG Results [g2iowa]
Feb 03, 2012 (4:54 pm)
Hopefully this helps.
In their February 2012 print issue, Motor Trend provided an update of their long-term 2012 Elantra stating the vehicle has yielded 20.7 MPG in three months of service. We immediately knew something wasn’t right with this number and reached out to them to learn more. Motor Trend discovered this number to be a typo from their actual test data and has since corrected the number to a spirited 25.6 MPG in the on-line edition of the article [LINK]. However, the correction cannot be made to the print edition as it has already circulated. We know this has caused some confusion for some owners and shoppers which is why we’d like to make sure everyone is aware of the 20.7 misprint error. If you have any questions, please Tweet us at Hyundai.
– Rob L, Hyundai Product PR Manager
#187 of 774 Re: Popular Mechanics 40 mpg test [rob_hyundai]
Feb 03, 2012 (7:38 pm)
This article echos many of the points that have been put forth in this discussion. Maybe now that they have been stated by a source like Popular Mechanics, they will be given more serious consideration.
I am glad PM emphasized that even though they achieved very good FE marks in their tests, "your mileage may vary." Aint' that the truth.
#188 of 774 Re: MT Elantra & Other Interesting MPG Results [rob_hyundai]
Feb 03, 2012 (9:09 pm)
Shouldn't you also know that something is wrong when the mpg is 25.6! The sticker for combined driving is 33, so you guys over at Hyundai should explain why their is a 23% discrepancy between your numbers and Motor Trends. I know that my elentra simply can not get over 23 in town even if there is no traffic and I drive as conservatively as possible, if traffic is bad I am lucky to 19 mpg.
#189 of 774 Re: POOR GAS MILAGE 2012 ELANTRA [kate007124]
Feb 03, 2012 (9:31 pm)
I totally agree kateoo71. I have a 2012 Elantra Limited. 9400 miles. i drive 85% hwy 15% city and i get 31.5 mpg most of the time. today i got 32.2 i was shocked it went up. My sticker says 29 city 40 hwy. So why is it always 31.5 why not 35 or 36 which it should be since i drive mostly hwy. I also thought about a class action suit. I dont want to hear about how im driving it either. i drive slow and staedy. I'm 52. safty is first not how fast i get there.......I DONT LIKE BEING LIED TO!!!! I wish i had my 2010 VW Jetta TDI back.
#190 of 774 Re: Popular Mechanics 40 mpg test [rob_hyundai]
Feb 03, 2012 (10:39 pm)
A quote from the PM article: "...City results were equally impressive, with each into the mid-30s. Bear in mind that we made no effort to be overly frugal—no drafting, no excessive coasting—and we made a point to keep up with traffic...".
Mid-30MPG in city driving. That is amazing. The simple physics involved in accelerating a 3000 pound vehicle in stop and go traffic coupled with the idle time at intersections? 34-35mpg in city driving is an achievement worthy of a Nobel Peace prize.
#191 of 774 A Philosophy of FE
Feb 04, 2012 (6:26 am)
Today's Wall Street Journal has their review of the Mazda 3i Grand Touring sedan (which the reviewer loved). He got caught up in having fun trying to get good fuel economy (which hd did achieve). This part of the article caught my eye: "While the EPA's numbers are useful only for comparison, the difference between real world and test-cycle fuel economy is a source of unending aggrevation for car buyers.... In his book...philosopher Tim Schroeder argues that pleasure...is fundamentally a function of expectation. I note it here only to bolster my far-fetched fuel-economy-as-pleasure argument." I define happiness as Reality minus expectation (H=R-E). All we can control are our expectations. So the higher the expection....
#192 of 774 Popular Mechanics Positive Road Test
Feb 04, 2012 (6:48 am)
Their test results appear to support Hyundai's and EPA's figures. But I do wish there was more information on how PM got the two specific cars they tested. I assume they were provided by the manufacturers. If so, and esp. if the manufacturers knew the purpose of this specific test, did PM get "ringers"? That is one reason why I trust Consumer Reports the most for such tests as they actually go out and buy a car off a dealer's lot. CR can't be "ringered". [Detroit used to be notorious for providing ringers in acceleration tests, esp. in the muscle car era.]
#193 of 774 Re: Popular Mechanics 40 mpg test [dodgeman07]
Feb 04, 2012 (10:39 am)
From what I saw in the PM article, their "city driving" was not inner-city-lots-of-stops kind of city driving. To me it seemed more like what I would call "suburban" driving. That is more realistic for low-to-mid-30s mpg. Getting that kind of mpg in true "city" driving with lots of stops/idling is difficult if not impossible in an ICE compact car. A hybrid, sure.