Last post on May 22, 2013 at 2:34 PM
You are in the Toyota Avalon
What is this discussion about?
Toyota Avalon, Toyota, Sedan
#235 of 494 Re: Edmunds/Inside Line is mighty impressed with the all-new Avalon! [luckyme1]
Dec 14, 2012 (7:48 am)
as sales had been slipping every year.
The sales were slipping because it was a stale model. It hadn't changed since 2005! Any model that goes that long without a major redo will have declining sales.
When the 05 came out it was a huge hit. I remember reading the forums here and people were having a tough time getting the one they wanted and dealers were not lowering prices.
If you look at the charts the 2000-2004 Avalon suffered the same sales loss as the model aged:
I'd wager that Toyota does not even come close to equaling the 2005 sales total.
#236 of 494 That walk through sales history lane
Dec 14, 2012 (9:07 am)
It's obvious from those numbers that The People love them some Avalon, and will love it some more
#237 of 494 Re: sporty [empoweredbc]
Dec 14, 2012 (12:01 pm)
could of been a better car.is more like it
#238 of 494 Re: sporty [djrc08861]
Dec 14, 2012 (5:44 pm)
Best in the class is fine with me. I'll take that all day.
#239 of 494 Re: Seattle Auto Show [bwia]
Dec 15, 2012 (7:26 am)
Both Consumer Reports and USAA use the same car buying service (TrueCar) and I have used it on two occasions without problems. If you qualify, the USAA service is free to USAA members and in comparing the numbers between the two companies, the bottom lines are identical.
#240 of 494 Re: Seattle Auto Show [bwia]
Dec 15, 2012 (7:49 am)
None taken. I thought I said a few thousand over book, and I should have said, a few thousand over high book?
In any case, none take and I'll try to be more clear in future posts, so as not to mislead anyone:)
#241 of 494 Re: sporty [empoweredbc]
Dec 15, 2012 (10:29 am)
nice.while your in your wanna be azera.ill be in my ES:)
#242 of 494 Re: sporty [djrc08861]
Dec 15, 2012 (1:05 pm)
Thanks for the trollage, hater.
If you hate the Avalon so much, why are so on it's nards?