Last post on Sep 22, 2013 at 5:16 PM
You are in the Volvo XC60
What is this discussion about?
Volvo XC60, SUV
#2 of 41 Re: How do you like your Volvo XC60? [mscar54]
Jul 23, 2011 (4:59 am)
I'd give it an A- and a solid recommendation. I own a 2011, 3.2 (no need for turbo), premium, convenience, pcc, multimedia. Took delivery in mid-February after ordering in mid-December. 8,000 miles to date. The only negative is the quirky sensus system. You need to press the "on" button a certain way or it doesn't respond, and the system is overly complicated. I would consider this a minor irritation. MPG is better than advertised 21 city/27 highway on regular gas. Vehicle is very solid with excellent road feedback. Impressive Pirelli tires. "Safe and Secure" 50,000 mile/6 year warranty and maintanance is a big plus. I've had no warranty issues. It's only been in for one service visit - its first oil change (free) 7,000 miles. Consumer Reports notes that Volvo reliability is the best of all European brands.
#3 of 41 Re: How do you like your Volvo XC60? [rkurlander]
Jul 23, 2011 (5:36 am)
I appreciate your reply. Why do you say that you don't need a turbo?
#4 of 41 Re: How do you like your Volvo XC60? [mscar54]
Jul 23, 2011 (6:20 am)
3.2 has plenty of power, turbo isn't worth the extra $ IMO.
#5 of 41 Re: How do you like your Volvo XC60?
Jul 23, 2011 (9:53 am)
(oops, this should be a reply to the original post, not rkurlander's post)
I like mine - a fully loaded 2011 T6 - but I'm biased of course. My wife got a 2011 Audi Q5 right before I got mine so I can compare those - but really any decision is going to come down to price and the test drive.
Compared to the Q5, I got more options with a slightly less overall refinement. I believe this still holds true for the 2012 models.
A comparably equipped Q5 (with BLIS, adaptive cruise control, keyless entry and push button start) was about $9 more. While the XC60 has more HP and torque, the Q5 has a quieter ride (engine and road noise are perhaps 30% less, wind noise above 60 MPH seems to be half as much).
The Q5 has a standard subwoofer (unavailable for the North American XC60 *grumble*), the Q5 automatic tailgate opens/closes twice as fast with much less noise (1/3 as loud as the XC60), the Q5 doors close with a heavier more sturdy feel and seal, and the Q5 moon roof is about 12" longer.
The XC60 tail lights are awesome and distinctive, while the Q5 has well-done and distinctive LED front running lights. Also the XC60 has an edge over the Q5 with the factory warranty and included maintenance.
But even if I wanted to pay more for the Q5, I don't like the body style as much as the XC60. Also, the controls for the entertainment/nav system are a bit more difficult to operate on the Q5.
I work from home so I don't drive much. I wanted a stronger engine for more acceleration and I like the low end torque, which gives better acceleration from a start than the Q5. I've had mine for 5 months now and it's got 1401 on the odometer, so I don't care about gas mileage and gas prices.
My issues with the XC60 are slight and mainly deal with refinement. For a luxury vehicle I expected more, and if things could be changed I would want, in order: 1) a quieter and faster automatic tailgate, 2) less wind noise at 60+ MPH, 3) less road noise when going over bumps in the road, 4) a subwoofer (standard or optional), and 5) fewer plastic parts, especially those at the bottom of the doors - the R-design paint-at-the-bottom look should be on all vehicles with maybe an option to have the current plastic at the bottom of the doors as scuff protection.
#6 of 41 Great responses
Jul 23, 2011 (3:32 pm)
I appreciate these replies very much. I test drove the 2011 XC60 turbo this afternoon, as well as an Infiniti FX 35, and like the ride and pickup of the Volvo much more. The Infiniti was equipped with many more bells and whistles, which of course, made it several thousand dollars more expensive.
I haven't investigated this further, but noticed that this Volvo's sunroof interior slide cover was made out a mesh-like material. Is this true on all the models? Does anyone know if this allows unwanted sun rays in on the driver?
This model, too, had just the basic stereo system in it, but I took along a CD and had a listen. I felt that it was plenty o.k. for my uses. The comment about wind noise above 60 mph gives me pause, and truly, I did not drive it very long at high speed. I really do like a quiet ride and will have to take do another interstate test drive at high speeds to check it out.
The Volvo salesman gave me the speil about the XC60's being their hottest car, and indeed, the one I drove was one of only two on the lot. While I know the 2012's are just around the corner, has anyone felt that they were unable to negotiate a good price on their XC60 due to its high demand?
#7 of 41 Re: Great responses [mscar54]
Jul 24, 2011 (4:39 am)
The sunroof mesh is an excellent feature which you don't have to use. It absorbs much of the heat and diffuses the light.
No issue here with wind noise above 60 mph.
Premium sound system is noticably better. Forgot to mention in previous post that my XC60 has AWD which works great. Save $ by not buying turbo.
The deal is certainly negotiable, especially if ordered vs. inventory. That would require 2012 at this point. I believe my deal was right around invoice per Edmunds.
#8 of 41 I pulled the trigger....
Jul 30, 2011 (6:33 am)
I bought one locally. I'm very excited! I'll tell more in the "prices paid" thread. Thanks for the replies.
#10 of 41 Re: Great responses [mscar54]
Aug 09, 2011 (9:33 pm)
"The comment about wind noise above 60 mph gives me pause, and truly, I did not drive it very long at high speed. I really do like a quiet ride and will have to take do another interstate test drive at high speeds to check it out. "
This wind noise is compared to an Audi Q5 though! It is much more quiet than a typical car. Personally I think it could be improved to be at the level of an Audi. (Of course, all around I'd take my XC60 over the Q5 any day. I'm happy with my decision).
Glad you got one. I would have loved to get mine off the lot. Enjoy!
#11 of 41 Re: How do you like your Volvo XC60? [mscar54]
Sep 24, 2011 (2:11 am)
Just bought a 2011 XC60 R-Design but haven't had much time in it. I'm coming from an Acura TL SH-AWD. The TL is super solid, drives like a dream, really sporty yet I never formed any real attachment to it. Too much science....not enough passion? I chose the XC60 because I wanted the utility of a crossover (not hauling sheets of plywood but like the increased room) and went with the R-Design for the looks and the slightly sportier feel and handling.
I have lots of family members with Volvos and while not the least reliable vehicles ever after 70K they all pretty much have spent some time at the shop. I think things are getting better with reliability but I'm anticipating more issues over the course of ownership compared to my Acura. That said the 5yrs/60K maintenance program and the fact I drive less than 10K per year means this thing will be under warrantee and the maintenance program the entire length of the loan. This means I'm not all that worried about my anticipated decrease in reliability. But who knows I could be pleasantly surprised.
Only time will tell. So far I like the car. This early into ownership all I can say is:
Pros: Great looks, sporty styling, nice handling for a crossover if you like a stiffer/sportier feel.
Cons: Going into this glass half empty with respect to reliability.
I'll update this thread as I get some more miles under my belt.