Last post on Apr 13, 2012 at 8:57 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views-Archives
What is this discussion about?
Chevrolet Volt, Car Buying, Electric Cars, Automotive News, Legislation
#1 of 48 Chevrolet Volt Tax Credit Scandal
by Kirstie@Edmunds HOST
Jun 01, 2011 (9:21 am)
Article posted below. Are you outraged or indifferent? Should the practice be stopped, and by whom?
#2 of 48 Chevy Volt Prices Paid and Buying Experience
Jun 01, 2011 (5:21 am)
Well folks yesterday GM dealer network hit a new low. According to a report GM dealers are selling their Volts to each other in order to claim the $7,500 tax credit for themselves and later on proceed with selling the same car to the end buyer as "used" who will no longer be able to apply for the credit because it was already used for the vehicle.
This is the full article.
Are GM Dealerships Gaming Chevy Volt Tax Credit?
I recently set out to determine how honest General Motors is being when it claims that demand for the Chevy Volt is exceeding supply. It was not hard to discover that this is not the case as retail sales remain dismal. A web search on vehicle locator sites such as Autotrader and Cars.com exhibit sufficient supply of the Volt, one dealership within 70 miles of my location had six new Volts available for sale.
Even Ebay lists vehicles, many had no bids and one listing in Texas hadn't even met reserve with only one day of bidding time remaining. But I discovered something far more disturbing during my search. Many Volts with practically no miles on them are being sold as "used" vehicles, enabling the dealerships to benefit from the $7,500 credit supplied by the American taxpayers on each car. The process of titling the Volts technically makes the dealerships the first owners of the vehicles, which gives them the ability to claim the subsidies. The cars are then offered to retail customers as "used" vehicles.
The practice of dealerships purchasing from one another is not uncommon. "Dealer trades" are done all the time in the industry. What is very unusual is for the receiving dealership to be able to maximize profits at the expense of taxpayers by claiming tax credits of $7,500. It is also very rare for dealerships to part with any model that has higher demand than supply, as GM claims is the case with the Volt. In addition to qualifying dealerships for a $7,500 tax subsidy, the titling process also allows GM to record Volt sales even if the cars are sitting on dealership lots.
While most of the dealerships offering "used" Chevy Volts for sale are Chevy dealers, I also found other manufacturers selling Volts with low mileage as "used" cars. A Kia dealership in California that I contacted seemed to suspect that they were doing something a bit underhanded when I called them to inquire about a "used" Volt for sale with only 30 miles on it. After I identified myself as being an associate with the National Legal and Policy Center, I was placed on hold. I was then told by a sales manager that the Volts offered at that dealership were rental cars with higher mileage on them. I later called the same dealership back posing as a potential customer and confirmed that a "used" Volt with only 30 miles on it was available. This also raises the question of why GM or Chevy dealerships would be selling Volts to other manufacturers' dealerships when they claim that there are not enough of the cars to meet retail demand.
A Chevy dealer in Chicago was more upfront with the info given on a "used" Chevy Volt with only 10 miles on it. The vehicle was being offered at MSRP. When I asked if I was eligible for the $7500 tax credit, I was told that I probably wasn't since the dealership was applying for the subsidy. This practice is one of the more egregious abuses to date purloined upon taxpayers as a result of the GM bailout. The intent (even if misguided) of the $7500 tax credit offered on the Chevy Volt is to encourage consumers to buy "green" vehicles, not to offer an opportunity for dealerships to game the system and maximize profits at the expense of the taxpayers. I also suspect many purchasers of "used" Volts will attempt to claim the $7500 tax credit for themselves, thus bringing the total tax subsidy on such transactions to $15,000 if not disallowed by the IRS.
General Motors should act immediately to stop the practice of dealership to dealership sales enabling the pilfering of Chevy Volt tax credits. I would go one step further and say that IRS requirements for taking green vehicle tax credits should be changed to eliminate the credit for businesses. Clarification should also be given on whether companies like General Electric will be allowed to take millions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies when they purchase thousands of Chevy Volts. It certainly would not be unprecedented for Treasury to change IRS code; they have made more complex changes as recently as 2009 to allow GM to benefit from a $45 billion tax loss carry-over credit.
Dealerships taking tax credits that were designed to benefit consumers is unacceptable. The practice should be stopped immediately, regardless of the desire of GM and the Obama Administration to do everything in their power to support the appearance of strong Chevy Volt sales.
#4 of 48 Re: Chevy Volt Prices Paid and Buying Experience [gagrice]
Jun 01, 2011 (7:25 am)
This is a dealership issue, not a GM issue. I'm not sure what influence GM can leverage to stop the practice as technically nothing illegal is happening and dealerships trade/buy cars off each other even without the subsidies.
Perhaps the subsidy should be reworded to only allow it for individuals/households or, to allow small businesses to take part should they want to, simply put a limit of 1 subsidy/entity/year. I think that's reasonable.
I find it interesting, too, as while the buying dealerships may realize the short-term profit from the $7500, they still have to sell the car. They must be operating under the assumption that demand is sufficient that the car will sell at something close to MSRP even without the subsidy. Otherwise, if the car is a true sales dud, they may not make back their investment even after the $7500.
#5 of 48 Re: Chevy Volt Prices Paid and Buying Experience [fushigi]
by Kirstie@Edmunds HOST
Jun 01, 2011 (9:10 am)
Well, GM *could* tell them that they'll lose their dealership franchise if they engage in that practice. However, I'm not sure it's their responsibility - except that it could damage their tenuous reputation. "GM took my tax dollars to bail them out of bankruptcy, and now they're taking it AGAIN." Regardless of the facts, it does not look good.
As with every tax regulation, if lawmakers (inadvertently) leave a loophole, you can guarantee that someone will leap through it.
#6 of 48 Re: Chevy Volt Prices Paid and Buying Experience [kirstie_h]
Jun 01, 2011 (9:17 am)
See I am not sure GM can do anything about it and i am not sure GM can revoke franchise rights. My understanding is that these franchise laws are very favorable to dealers in all states. They are a very powerful group because they employ a lot of people and their businesses generate big tax gains for local governments.
I would like to see GM at the very least verbally address this issue.
#7 of 48 Re: Chevy Volt Prices Paid and Buying Experience [seaurchin]
by Kirstie@Edmunds HOST
Jun 01, 2011 (9:41 am)
Yeah, even as I was writing, I wasn't entirely sure that they could do anything. But, if this ends up blowing up and tarnishing GM's reputation, the short-term benefit of the tax credit is going to be wiped away by the loss in sales (and probably dealerships). GM isn't in a position to take a big, negative PR hit right now.
#8 of 48 I think the
Jun 01, 2011 (10:11 am)
The worst part is the dealer who took the credit himself, and then did not take $7500 off the price.
Wouldn't that be construed as "tax fraud" because the tax credit was designed for the CONSUMER of the car. To "steal" the credit then not take that credit off the price seems like straight up TAX FRAUD.
#9 of 48 I doubt this is the whole story
Jun 01, 2011 (10:22 am)
I suspect the story as written is missing some facts. It seems couched in the omnipresent hatred of GM that ferments in forum after forum without check here and in other places, partly over the bailout money.
I suspect people would be better served looking at the money spent by the government folks on Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac. But I'll go along for a minute here.
The hatred here seems to be following up on the number of sales of the Volt. Those sales were limited to certain states and to my knowledge still are limited. I looked in lower Michigan so I could see a Volt when we go visit. None of the dealerships in the area showed a Volt.
I did find a used one in Columbus, Ohio. It is clearly described by the Chevy dealership as NOT for sale (sorry to bust your bubbles here). They got it from a dealer in California to have one for people locally to see.
As for a dealer purchasing a Volt solely to claim the $7500 tax credit, has that been documented?
Are we going to talk about the Prius subsidies from our own government by tax credits to purchasers for years? Even though the auto maker is not a US company? How is that different than the US government giving a tax credit for an electric-based vehicle if it happens to come from GM? Were any Prius' sold to other dealers who took the tax credit? We need a thorough investigation of this now.
I still suspect the motive behind this is the general attitude toward GM that keeps on going and going like the energizer bunny--which is electric too, just like the Volt.
#10 of 48 Re: I think the [larsb]
Jun 01, 2011 (10:23 am)
You may have a point. It seems that the tax credit on hybrids was for individuals. Where this one they made across the board. With GE purchasing a lot of them. If dealer A buys a car from dealer B and claims the tax credit he is buying at a very reasonable price. He can then sell for whatever the market will bear or use it in his business. Seems like it would be reasonable shuttle vehicle. Anyway you cut it there will be people unhappy to see their tax dollars go into the pockets of Corporate leaders.