2237 messages,
Last post on Feb 26, 2013 at 1:36 AM
You are in the
Automotive News & Views Forum.
What is this discussion about?
Toyota, Hyundai, Lexus, Ford, Audi, Automotive News, Legislation
#2218 of 2237 Re: Forget the Red Button [andres3]
by wwest
Jan 11, 2012 (8:53 am)
"..My AC failed, but it wasn't due to the computer..."
How would YOU know...?
And....which computer...?
The engine/transmission ECU that is supposed to disable the A/C clutch during WOT, or closely nearby, engine operation...?
Or was it the one (or 2) in the A/C control "head" that didn't fail...?
#2219 of 2237 Re: Forget the Red Button [wwest]
by andres3
Jan 11, 2012 (9:48 am)
The engine/transmission ECU that is supposed to disable the A/C clutch during WOT, or closely nearby, engine operation...?
Or was it the one (or 2) in the A/C control "head" that didn't fail...?
if the A/C can't handle WOT without destroying itself, that sounds like a design and engineering issue, not a computer issue.
#2220 of 2237 Re: Forget the Red Button [andres3]
by wwest
Jan 11, 2012 (10:16 am)
No argument there, the design may not be robust enough for operating above ~4,000 RPM. But still, it wouldn't have failed had the ECU not left it enabled.
#2221 of 2237 Re: Forget the Red Button [wwest]
by andres3
Jan 11, 2012 (10:46 am)
But still, it wouldn't have failed had the ECU not left it enabled.
But how would we ever know that, couldn't it have just been a poorly assembled compressor?
Wouldn't an ECU malfunction trigger a Check Engine light or some other warning light or readable error code.
#2222 of 2237 Re: Forget the Red Button [andres3]
by wwest
Jan 11, 2012 (5:56 pm)
"...couldn't it have been..."
Yes, but I was "rebuting" the statement that there was no computer "failure" associated with the compressor failure.
"...Would an ECU malfunction trigger..."
Possibly not, the A/C monitor firmware will provide an indication and throw a code if the compressor is enabled but NOT rotating cognizant with engine RPM. The inverse case is a "corner case" and would be mostly needless.
#2223 of 2237 Re: Forget the Red Button [wwest]
by houdini1
Jan 12, 2012 (9:13 am)
I'm with andres3, all of this is pure speculation...if not outright hogwash !!
#2224 of 2237 Re: Forget the Red Button [houdini1]
by wwest
Jan 12, 2012 (11:14 am)
Speculation...Yes, YES.
That was the actual intention.
Hogwash !!
NOT.
#2225 of 2237 Re: Forget the Red Button [houdini1]
by la4mead
Jan 12, 2012 (1:05 pm)
Yes, I agree. This discussion frequently takes turns away from the topic.
Apr 12, 2012 (9:55 am)
"Federal regulators plan to require automakers to design a brake-throttle override system into future vehicles to reduce the risks of high-speed, unintended acceleration.
The proposal by the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is a result of a highly publicized 2009 crash of a Lexus ES 350 and a subsequent flood of complaints about incidents of unintended acceleration in Toyota and Lexus vehicles."
Federal regulators want brake override systems in all cars (LA Times)
#2227 of 2237 Re: A needed fix? [steve_]
by wwest
Apr 13, 2012 (10:00 am)
If they expect it to be functional then it will need to be implemented separately from the engine/transaxle control ECU.