Last post on Nov 01, 2011 at 6:35 AM
You are in the Classic Cars
What is this discussion about?
Coupe, Convertible, Truck, Sedan, Wagon
#29 of 30 Re: Re 924 [Mr_Shiftright]
Nov 01, 2011 (12:15 am)
Your logic makes perfect sense to me, in terms of the 924 vs. the 944. However, how many clean, good running 944s are left, at a price that makes sense? What I'm really asking is, for what you'd pay for a clean, good running 944, aren't there a number of much better newer model choices? Will even a 944 become a classic that justifies the cost of ownership? Aren't 944s just nice, but hardly fabulous - and very expensive to own - old cars too, albeit better than the 924s?
If one wants a front engine, RWD sports car, limiting the search to Porsches strikes me as tunnel vision.
#30 of 30 Re: Re 924 [hpmctorque]
by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Nov 01, 2011 (6:35 am)
Well I'd venture to say that a well-sorted out 944 turbo is, in fact, a fabulous car, and in the right hands, on the right race track, would give a modern 911 fits. The 944 is such a well-balanced car, and the handling is absolutely top notch, even by modern standards.
Point taken on old, non-turbo, early 944 beaters. Let them go for parts. But a show quality 944 turbo coupe could crack $20K, whereas the same 924 would be lucky to bring you $7000 bucks-- To say nothing of the 944 demolishing the 924 in any type of race.
I suppose one could gain a teensy bit of prestige from owning a 924, among the unknowing few. And you know, the 914 was spurned for decades and finally has won some respect from sports car lovers, so who knows? Maybe someday a 924 turbo would be worth decent money. Personally I find it a rough car with no outstanding attributes to interest me.