Last post on Aug 05, 2011 at 7:17 AM
You are in the Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan
What is this discussion about?
Ford Fusion, Honda Accord, Toyota Camry, Sedan
#4 of 82 Looks like Ford is doing something right
Dec 27, 2009 (3:12 pm)
FORD VEHICLE RESIDUAL VALUES RISE $1,300 ON AVERAGE FROM 2009 TO 2010 MODEL YEAR; INDUSTRY'S LARGEST GAIN•The projected resale value of 2010 Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles after 36 months in service increased by an average of $1,310 per vehicle compared to the 2009 model year – the industry's largest increase among full-line manufacturers
•The improvement allowed Ford to narrow the residual value gap with leading Asian automakers and maintain its advantage over U.S.-based automakers
•The 2010 Ford Fusion is expected to bring customers $687 more than the 2010 Toyota Camry after 36 months in service; the residual value of the 2010 Ford Flex commands an $1,800 premium over the Toyota Highlander
•Improved quality, new features and popular redesigned products are helping to boost Ford's residual values. Ford improved more than any other automaker in ALG's Perceived Quality Survey released in the fall of 2009
•Compete Inc., a Massachusetts research firm that studies online car shopping, says Ford has surpassed Toyota in customer consideration for the first time since it began tracking such data in 2002. Compete data show Ford surpassed Toyota in customer consideration in September, October and November
DEARBORN, Mich., Dec. 18, 2009 – Ford Motor Company vehicles, bolstered by improved quality, fuel economy and popular redesigned models, recorded the largest increase in residual values from the 2009 to the 2010 model year among full-line manufacturers.
"We are very pleased that the quality and fuel economy our products are delivering is reflected in our residual values," said Ken Czubay, Ford vice president, Marketing, Sales and Service. "We know future trade-in value is a very important factor to customers when they are shopping for a new vehicle."
Ford already held a residual value advantage over its U.S.-based rivals. With the improvement in the 2010 model year, Ford narrowed the gap with leading Asian automakers, including Toyota.
#5 of 82 Re: 2010 Fusion V/S Accord and Camry [koho955]
Dec 27, 2009 (9:37 pm)
I too drove all three before buying a Fusion V6 SEL. The Camry had a real cheap bland interior and the similar model (SE) had no trunk pass through and rode very low to the ground (a would be problem with the dip in my drive way). The Accord wasn't too bad, but the lack of a backup camera in the Nav system was a deal killer for me, plus I wasn't too fond of the dash (looks like a face smiling at you). To me the closest comparison was the Altima, but I didn't want to pay $1000 more or an 2009 model.
#6 of 82 Re: 2010 Fusion V/S Accord and Camry [hackattack5]
Jan 07, 2010 (11:20 am)
I had a 2009 Camry Hybrid, and although it is a reliable, dependable car, there were just too many gripes to make it a great car. The interior was cheap, the shade for the sunroof was flimsy and would rattle, the seat material was thin and showed signs of wear after 34K miles and 16 months of use, in fact if I pressed the palm of my hand down on the front middle of the seat cushion, I could feel the springs. The handling of the car was horrible, it cornered like a rowboat, and was too soft and floating. It has terrible wind noise, and road noise was more than I should expect on such a highly rated car. It had a good sounding stereo, reception on AM was pretty good, comfort wasn't too bad, but long trips made my legs ache after a while. A couple positive things to grant it, the Smart Key system is great, and you cant beat the 38 MPG I got.
I traded it for a 2010 Fusion Sport, and I don't miss it one bit, not even the smart key. It is more comfortable, handles far superior to the Camry, is much quieter, even with the throaty V6 under throttle. So far 8000 miles, not a single rattle or squeak. Material quality is much better than the Camry, the Sony is OK, not as good as the JBL unless you are driving with the speed sensitive adjust at the max, then it sounds good, until you slow down and stop. Fuel economy isn't too bad considering how much horsepower is under the hood which I DO use. On the highway I can achieve 31 MPG, my normal driving is 23. The heated seats are also heated up the back, the others only do the seat cushion, not the back. The Sync is great, being able to plug a small hard drive in with all my music and not having to touch a CD, but just scroll through my music, or tell it to play an artist, great. The Bluetooth for the phone is much better than the Camry, I can actually carry a two way conversation without waiting for the other party to stop talking, just as if I were actually holding the phone. The gripe I have is the same as quite a few others, the button locations on the center stack could be better arranged, and some better use of the steering wheel controls would be an improvement. Everyone in the family loves the Sport, the little ones love going somewhere in it, they like when I give it gas and they get pushed into their car seats. The car handles as if on rails, taking curves and turns that in the Camry required me to slow way down, I can take much faster now with little body roll. And overall, the car just LOOKS better, inside and out. I really like the new front end design over last years models, the head lights are much sleeker.
#7 of 82 4 cyl test drive -- and my decision
Jan 07, 2010 (5:41 pm)
I test drove the 2010 Fusion 2.5L 4 cyl sedan, the 2009 Accord 4 cyl sedan and coupe. Here are my impressions:
Fusion -- The car had good handling, and a nice balance of handling bumps without the sponginess of the Camry. I thought the dashboard lighting was cheap looking, with red and blue lighting (it was daytime, so it may look better at night. With a sunroof the headroom was minimal, lower than several other cars I've driven. My main gripe was that even with the larger 4 cyl engine, when I accelerated I got lots of whiny noise, but little acceleration.
Accord -- Performance was better than the Fusion...it spoke less, sounded more powerful, and delivered more acceleration. The coupe is downright peppy off the line. Some might consider the interior bland, but I thought it was more refined than the Fusion. The buttons are somewhat confusing, with lots of similarly sized buttons, but it starts to make sense after an adjustment period.
In the end, the Accord held together as a package better than the Fusion -- to me Honda is still a master of making the various elements work as a unit. I bought the coupe, partly for the little bit of additional horsepower, partly for the better styling, and partly just to avoid redundancy with my other sedan. It's been a great car so far.
I personal view is that the Fusion is a legitimate competitor in the midsize market, but is a generation or two from putting all the pieces together into a whole that exceeds the parts.
#8 of 82 Re: 4 cyl test drive -- and my decision [volvowner]
Jan 07, 2010 (6:44 pm)
"In the end, the Accord held together as a package better than the Fusion"
Well I traded my 2008 Accord with 23,000 miles on it for a Fusion SEL. The Accord was a 4 cylinder and when I floored it the engine would hesitate for a few seconds then take off like a bat out of hell. The road noise was terrible and I was on my 2nd set of REAR brakes. I noticed the materials and mostly the workmanship had dropped from previous Accords that I owned. I like my Fusion so far (2500 miles) it is very quite inside and I like the 390 watt Sony stereo with sirius and the Microsoft sync system. The traction control works great in the snow. I do agree that the roof line is a little low with the moonroof and the 2.5 engine is noisy when its floored.
#9 of 82 Re: 4 cyl test drive -- and my decision [hackattack5]
Jan 07, 2010 (7:45 pm)
I have always been a Toyota and Honda/Acura guy but when I decided to go back to a car instead of an SUV this round, the Ford Fusion drove the best. I did go with the V6 so the engine noise is minimal and so is the road noise. The road, wind and outside traffic noise was brutal in the Honda and Toyota compared to the 2010 Ford Fusion V6 SEL.
Now that I have about 2,500 miles on it and the seats are worked in, I am truly amazed that this is an American made Ford product. I am pretty picky about noise and comfort but this car drives great.
Very impressed how great this car drives in the snow with a big snow falling in Chicago tonight. Great tires!
Used the USB port today for the first time to play MP3 files and the stereo jams!
#10 of 82 Re: 4 cyl test drive -- and my decision [hackattack5]
Jan 07, 2010 (8:30 pm)
You made a couple of points about the Fusion that I agree with...I just forgot to put in my original post (the dinner call came as I was typing and...first things first). The Sync system is useful and I think a real selling point, and Honda tends to be slow to add the latest technology -- my radio is mediocre and it'd be nice to have a USB connection. I don't think the Accord materials are substandard, but the previous gen was exceptional for the price point, and they did take a couple of steps backward. Seems like in 2003 their target was the Passat, whereas in 2008 it was the Sonata.
As for you flooring your Accord, I don't do that...maybe that driving style is why you were on your 2nd set of brakes?
#11 of 82 Re: 4 cyl test drive -- and my decision [volvowner]
Jan 08, 2010 (7:40 pm)
"As for you flooring your Accord, I don't do that...maybe that driving style is why you were on your 2nd set of brakes"
Did not have to floor it too many times, merge gone bad or sweet nibblets didn't see that guy coming or racing a fusion at a red light. Now as far as the REAR brakes being shot at 23,000 miles since you did buy the Accord you will be finding out soon enough about the brake problem the next time you take it in for service ask them how much pad you have left in the back V/S the front.
#12 of 82 Re: 4 cyl test drive -- and my decision [koho955]
Jan 13, 2010 (7:49 am)
The other day I drove home with the radio off, something I rarely do. I never noticed before, but the Sport is so quiet at 60MPH, all I hear is a slight humming whisper, only time I heard tire noise was when I hit a bump, and even those weren't very loud. My father-in-law is a mercedes guy, and I let him take the car for a drive, and even he liked it, if he gets another car, I wouldn't be surprised to see him get one of these. Of course he has an S600, but if it breaks on him again, the last repairs were well over $6000 for an alternator and oil leak, he probably will dump the car.
I wish there was a Lincoln dealer near here, I just want to look at the MKZ and see what it has that the Fusion doesn't(Aside from HID and Homelink).
#13 of 82 Re: 4 cyl test drive -- and my decision [acdii]
Jan 13, 2010 (9:19 am)
Heated and cooled seats, THX stereo are the main differences currently. I expect the MKZ to get the new 300+ hp 3.7L engine at some point and some of the newer features like park assist, etc. Take a look at the new MKX (just shown at the detroit auto show) for a hint of where the MKZ will be going.