Sign In Join 



Honda Accord Crosstour

96 messages,  Last post on Nov 20, 2009 at 2:22 PM

You are in the Honda Accord Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Honda Accord Crosstour


Messages Page 10 of 10
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#87 of 96
Re: Seattle Auto Show... [drr98] by thegraduate
Nov 19, 2009 (6:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: drr98 (Nov 18, 2009 9:40 pm)

I "beheld" a Crosstour last Friday at the Auto Show; I was with six people I knew. One loved it, the other five couldn't have cared less about it. Me? I felt about like I feel about the current Accord sedan. I wasn't put-off by the design, but it didn't make me want one either.
 
I was surprised to sit in a Venza and find touches of cheapness here and there (flimsy plastic covers, etc). I had higher hopes for that vehicle.
#88 of 96
I have one by nmctowner
Nov 19, 2009 (3:06 pm)
Reply
We are now in the possession of a 2010 CT. The critics are wrong. it looks great, drives great and was just what we had in mind. White, EX-L AWD. Sticker price, no hassle, great experience. More when we get some miles on it. It is larger than we expected. Wife's car - drives more like a car than her Murano which was traded in. She really liked the heated seats this moring as it was cold.
#89 of 96
Re: I have one [nmctowner] by thegraduate
Nov 19, 2009 (7:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nmctowner (Nov 19, 2009 3:06 pm)

Well, glad to hear it drives great, but its hard to argue with someone's idea of the vehicle's looks - they're in the eye of the beholder. In exterior style, I like the looks of my '96 Accord over my '06 Accord, but find the interior of my 06 to be unmatched by any midsizer past or present. A lot of people would disagree to one or both statements, but it really doesn't matter - we all have different perceptions of what "looks great."
 
 
#90 of 96
Accord Interior & new Accord Style [thegraduate] by bearcrkrd
Nov 19, 2009 (8:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Nov 19, 2009 7:18 pm)

My brother has an '05 Accord EX 4cyl he bought new. The interior is light colored cloth, and is perfect.
When I get an oil change for my '08 Civic I always walk the lot rather than sit in the waiting room. The Accord 4 dr doesn't look so good. I find it odd that if I see one by itself on the road, and not a whole line of 'em on a lot, it looks ok. They even look slighly raked, due to the beltline mold (or whatever you call it).
Again, as I type this there is a picture to the Right of a Red Crosstour. Little picture, and it's ugly. The one at the Seattle Auto Show looked better! I'm still not sold on the whole concept, but I'm not smart enough to argue either way.
#91 of 96
Re: Accord Interior & new Accord Style [bearcrkrd] by thegraduate
Nov 20, 2009 (6:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: bearcrkrd (Nov 19, 2009 8:38 pm)

I'm still not sold on the whole concept, but I'm not smart enough to argue either way.
 
You don't have to be smart enough to argue (although I don't doubt you could hold your own), because there's no argument here - simply "lively discussion."
#92 of 96
1st hand opinion soon (maybe) by stickguy
Nov 20, 2009 (8:37 am)
Reply
Ihappen to be sitting at the honda dealer at the moment, waiting for an oil change on my accord. I will have to wander up front and see if they have a CT to scope out.
#93 of 96
impressions by stickguy
Nov 20, 2009 (9:20 am)
Reply
saw one on the showroom floor. I actually like the style of it. sort of bold, and makes an impression. Nicer looking than the 4 door accord sitting next to it (although I really don't care for the looks of that car).
 
anyway, this thing is really just a 5 door accord hatchback that rides a little higher.
 
interior was OK. Basic accord up front, but very roomy and comfy back seat.
 
The cargo area was small, at least with the rear seats up. Fairly high floor combined with the sloped rear end leads to very little height to work with. Did have good room though with the rear seats folded (also noted that the rear seats dont slide, a poor move IMO).
 
also, terrible blind spots out the back, to the rear quarters and directly back. In the dark or rain, probably no rear vision other than the mirrors. You could lose a tank back there.
 
I know that it is all about style, and americans wont buy a wagon unless it pretends to be a truck, but if Honda made this a true wagon, with a functionally designed rear end, I would be all over it as a replacement for our odyssey.
 
As it is, the pilot gives up a little in MPG and handling (probably) but is way more user friendly. Unless, of course, you don't need rear passenger + cargo together.
 
sadly? I like the CRV EX-L better! although of course this was just sitting, not driving.
#94 of 96
Re: impressions [stickguy] by thegraduate
Nov 20, 2009 (10:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: stickguy (Nov 20, 2009 9:20 am)

sadly? I like the CRV EX-L better! although of course this was just sitting, not driving.
 
I'm with you. I struggle when looking at them side-by-side. Why wouldn't I get the CR-V for a lot less money, better economy, and more practical packaging? It its not obvious by now, I'm really practical-minded. The CR-V interior even seems better laid-out to my eyes. Sure, the Crosstour is a V6, but I doubt anyone's doing major hot-rodding in their family cars. I could be wrong though!
 

 
 
#95 of 96
crv vs. CT by stickguy
Nov 20, 2009 (12:52 pm)
Reply
The CT is roomier by far in the passenger compartment, although the CRV probably has a more useful cargo area. And is quite a bit cheaper.
 
I imagine though the CRV is a bit of a dog if you get a decent load in it and have to pull some hills with the AC on. Gonna be a lot of downshifting going on.
 
Totally different target markets too I assume.
#96 of 96
Re: crv vs. CT [stickguy] by elroy5
Nov 20, 2009 (2:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: stickguy (Nov 20, 2009 12:52 pm)

The CT should ride/handle much better, be more comfortable, and quieter than the CRV. I would not consider a CRV, because loaded down I'm sure it doesn't have much get up and go on the highway (no V6 option). I also like the idea of having an Accord, that doesn't look like every other Accord on the road. That would be a refreshing change. When we evacuated for hurricanes, we wanted to take as much stuff with us as we could, The CT would probably carry considerably more than our 03 Accord's trunk does. If the CT is still around, when I'm looking for a new car, it will have a good shot at being our next ride.

Messages Page 10 of 10
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement