Last post on Nov 05, 2009 at 9:27 PM
You are in the Subaru Legacy & Outback
What is this discussion about?
Subaru Outback, Wagon
2010 Subaru Outback First Drive - First Impressions: Larger in all the dimensions that enhance rear passenger comfort and cargo capacity, but no more turbo kills the fun.(more)
#45 of 52 diesel outback down under
Sep 12, 2009 (8:36 am)
Per info read from the Sydney Morning Herald's website, it's claimed that Subaru will be adding the 2.0 Diesel engine to Australian Outbacks around November of this year.
#46 of 52 Re: diesel outback down under [kurtamaxxxguy]
Sep 14, 2009 (11:06 am)
If we ever see one here it'll be the bigger diesel, though.
#47 of 52 What about Outback 2.5i CVT transmission?
Oct 09, 2009 (11:45 am)
Hi, I'm Serge, from France. Sorry, my English is a bit clumsy. I own an Outback (3.0R) and I would like to buy the new 2;5i with CVT transmission. Subaru will not officially sell it in France (only 3.6 gas and 2;0 Diesel). Fortunately, they accept to take some orders. The snag is that it's impossible to test drive the 2.5i (only the 3.6R and the Diesel). My little Honda Jazz has a CVT : it works perfectly well and is very pleasant. Could the 2.5i CVT owners send me their impressions about the 2.5 engine and this new CVT transmission? Are they decent? Many thanks.
#48 of 52 Re: diesel outback down under [ateixeira]
Oct 09, 2009 (12:50 pm)
If we ever see one here it'll be the bigger diesel, though
I suspect the design depends on the small cylinder bore size. That would suggest that Subaru would either sell the same 2 liter here or would need to make a 3.0 liter six to get more displacement. Also with the extreme compression ratio think of the head gasket failure possibilities that are barely behind us with the 2.5l gasoline engine.
My guess is that the same 2.0 diesel four will be sold here rather than also building a six. If fuel economy is the principal goal and the new CVT can take the diesel's low rpm torque the result would seem likely to be remarkable economy. They might also want to wait to be sure the CVT is sufficiently reliable with the gasoline engine.
#49 of 52 3.6 R outback brief impressions
Nov 01, 2009 (5:00 pm)
Was given a test drive in a 3.6 R '10 Outback Premium today.
Compared to the '09 Outback XT, I found the 3.6R roomier, less tippy on turns, more linear in engine response (torque a lot better than the 3.0 R) much more rear seat room (though foot arch space was tighter than it is on the Forester, and the rear seat's pretty low). Fabric seat was OK but not as supportive as the one in my '09 Forester XT. Felt some coarseness in the steering, some occasional harshness over sharp bumps. Road noise was lower than the Forester.
The dealer asked me that, if the '10 Outback was available when I did my comparison of '09 Outback and '09 Forester, would I have chosen the Outback?
The Outback feels much "Larger" than the Forester but is harder to see out of and felt more confining. Outback Trim's attractive but controls are tiny and less intuitive than the Forester. Outback uses regular fuel but more of it.
It would have been closer, but the Forester would have still won.
#50 of 52 Re: 3.6 R outback brief impressions [kurtamaxxxguy]
Nov 02, 2009 (5:12 am)
It would have been closer, but the Forester would have still won
I would have agreed before I borrowed a friend's Forester for part of yesterday afternoon. I had expected to like it well enough to eventually replace my 2005 3.0R VDC Outback with a Forester. Since the Forester had thousands of miles I could push it hard: The noise level, exhaust rap, was even higher than it had been on my 1997 Legacy GT wagon and the ride was much rougher than my 3.0R. The Forester certainly didn't like speed bumps! I'm keeping my low miles 3.0R. Perhaps the 3.6R will get folding mirrors next year and by then the new Acura AWD wagon will also be available.
#51 of 52 Re: 3.6 R outback brief impressions [kurtamaxxxguy]
Nov 03, 2009 (1:53 pm)
October was the first month in years that the Outback outsold the Forester.
Both are up and doing well, though.
#52 of 52 Re: What about Outback 2.5i CVT transmission? [serge_france]
Nov 05, 2009 (9:27 pm)
I have the 2.5 with the CVT and now have 2,000KM on it. I have driven it in hilly terrain and find there is enough power and it is quiet enough. You do not feel the upshifts at all, but do feel the downshifts at the lower shift points(this is not too bad but not as smooth as the acceleration). The paddle shifters work very well and you do not even have to move the shifter over to M mode. This feature I use for braking lots. I feel it is a good pairing of engine and transmission. At 120KMPH you are barely registering 2,000 RPM on the tac. Today drove it thru snow in northern Canada and it tracked very well. Overall very happy with the car. It is the quietest vehicle I have every owned!