35 messages,
Last post on Feb 28, 2010 at 4:57 PM
You are in the
Infiniti G37 Forum.
What is this discussion about?
Infiniti G37, Ford Taurus, Car Comparisons, Sedan
Comparison Test: 2010 Ford Taurus SHO vs. 2009 Infiniti G37 Journey - Put the spec charts of the 2010 Ford Taurus SHO and 2009 Infiniti G37 Journey next to one another, and there are good reasons to believe these two sport sedans are peers — on paper, at least.(more)
#30 of 35 Re: Here is an idea [nmuwildcat65]
by guy1974
Jul 31, 2009 (6:37 am)
Completely agree - Edmunds was biased in this review. They speced up the Taurus with stuff you don`t need but kept the "G" with a lesser spec to keep the price down.
Just compare a Taurus with performance pack and maybe a couple of other options ($41 tops) against an equivalent specification Infinit and I think we would see different results.
Anyway comparing Ford to Infiniti is a plus for Ford, because Infiniti have Nissan for mainstream cars.
Jul 31, 2009 (9:30 am)
Why didn't chris use a G37x allwheel drive in the comparison? Oh thats right, they don't want to compare apples to apples. why not the g35 4door infinity instead of a coupe? Oh thats right...repeat.
#32 of 35 Does anyone have any real information on the SHO's AWD system?
by tgoodell
Aug 11, 2009 (4:42 am)
The review I read on Edmunds.com indicated the AWD system is a Haldex with a rear bias--although it wasn't mentioned what the Front/Rear bias ratio is. In the Motor Trend review, I thought it said the AWD system is front-biased. Does anyone know anything about it?
With more and more cars, cross-overs, trucks, etc getting AWD (and there being so many different types of AWD systems out there), it's becoming more and more frustrating that practically no one who does car/truck reviews bothers to mention the specifics of the AWD system. Hell, even the manufacturers' websites don't tell you anything about how them--or how they work.
Thanks,
Tim G.
#33 of 35 Just Drive the EcoBoost SHO
by grega
Aug 12, 2009 (12:03 pm)
Too many people complain before they have even seen in person or driven the SHO. Just wait until buyers get to experience the awesome performance (and economy) of EcoBoost and they will be sold.
The SHO at $38K is ONLY $200 more (with Inflation) vs. the last SHO and loaded with more content (EB, AWD, 6-speed, etc.) and technology for the price.
Note: The 2010 Taurus starts at $25K just like the '09 Taurus = Value!
Edmunds comparison of the SHO to G37 was in error, too different size and class of cars, no wonder the G37 was more nimble, its SMALLER. Its foolish to compare the SHO to anything below its size, so stop with the 3-series, A4, G's, etc. you need to move up to full size - Infinity M45, GS450, 5-Series and bigger and then you WILL SEE the SHO is a standout!
Plus, the SHO has (10) exclusive features not offered in ANY car in its class, that will add value and low volume sales will keep resale and residuals high.
#34 of 35 Re: Does anyone have any real information on the SHO's AWD system? [tgoodell]
by tgoodell
Feb 21, 2010 (8:27 am)
The type of AWD system drastically affects how the vehicle handles (both in daily driving--and in adverse conditions/situations), so I would've thought this to be a concern which others might have, too.
Guess this isn't important to anyone else
#35 of 35 Re: Just Drive the EcoBoost SHO [grega]
by wilcox
Feb 28, 2010 (4:57 pm)
Let's remember that we could have read a comparison between Taurus and Toyota Avalon and Chrysler full size products....instead of G37, or other smaller foreign exotic models.
Go ahead and drive one before badmouthing it.
I'd rather purchase more 'domesticly produced' vehicles myself. It's better for USA overall.
IMO, many of the posting whinners and phoo-phoop'ers couldn't pay cash for any car (or secure a loan even)... especially for recent model used G37's or Taurus anything. These are poseurs ready for an Aveo, Yaris, Kia, Hyundia minimobile, or PT Cruiser payments..get real, grow up. Aahahaha.