Sign In Join 



Cash for Clunkers - Does it Work for You?

2647 messages,  Last post on Oct 01, 2009 at 6:33 PM

You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester

What is this discussion about? Car Buying, Legislation

Edmunds Cash for Clunkers Calculator
 
I Traded My Clunker and Bought a....?


Messages Page 260 of 265
1
...
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
...
265
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2588 of 2647
A similar post may have appeared earlier, but... by euphonium
Sep 19, 2009 (10:08 pm)
Reply
A vehicle at 15 mpg and 12,000 miles per year uses 800 gallons a year of gasoline.
 
A vehicle at 25 mpg and 12,000 miles per year uses 480 gallons a year. So, the average clunker transaction will reduce US gasoline consumption by 320 gallons per year.
 
They claim 700,000 vehicles – so that's 224 million gallons /year.
 
That equates to a bit over 5 million barrels of oil. 5 million barrels of oil is about ¼ of one day's US consumption. And, 5 million barrels of oil costs about $350 million dollars at $75/bbl.
 
So, we all contributed to spending $3 billion (of Taxpayer money - - appropriated & spent by Congress !!) to save $350 million.
 
How good a deal was that ???
 
They'll probably do a great job with health care though !!
#2589 of 2647
Re: A similar post may have appeared earlier, but... [euphonium] by tidester HOST
Sep 20, 2009 (1:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: euphonium (Sep 19, 2009 10:08 pm)

we all contributed to spending $3 billion (of Taxpayer money - - appropriated & spent by Congress !!) to save $350 million
 
Yes, but over the 10 year lifetime of those new vehicles we'll just about break even!
 
On the other hand, most of the clunkers that were traded in probably wouldn't have lasted through 10 years and likely would have been traded in for ... drum roll ... more fuel efficient vehicles. Break even can be elusive.
 
tidester, host
SUVs and Smart Shopper
#2590 of 2647
Re: A similar post may have appeared earlier, but... [euphonium] by kdhspyder
Sep 20, 2009 (7:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: euphonium (Sep 19, 2009 10:08 pm)

You have correctly done the math....for one year. Now consider the effects of these non-existant vehicles being off the road for then next 'X' years and multiply your $350 million by 'X' years.
 
That's just the savings for the nation from having the vehicles off the road.
 
But the other key points you missed in your SOTP analysis is 'how much additional taxes were generated by this program?' For the months of July/Aug revenues at millions of jobs and businesses across the nation jumped by 10-30%. A jump in revenue means a jump in taxes paid/due. A good estimate is that of the $3 Billion allocated to the public the government immediately collected about $1 Billion in taxes. Net cost....$2 Billion. Slick.
 
Now...you can begin to factor the savings for the nation in money not spend for fuel over the next 'X' years. The net cost for the nation is about ZERO.
 
If the healthcare program works as well as this...it will be a raging success. Only the chronic complainers will continue to complain. But they can't be helped.
#2591 of 2647
red herring by stickguy
Sep 20, 2009 (8:25 am)
Reply
the gas savings was just a red herring or smoke screen.
 
This progagram was all about giving a bailout to the auto industry, without just handing over the money like with the banks.
 
hey, maybe that's what the banking bailout should have been. Give everyon that payed takes last year but made less than 75K $500 in a bank account!
 
also, the taxes are 2 different pockets. The feds paid the 3bill, but the sales tax windfall went to the states and sometimes local coffers.
#2592 of 2647
C4C Fallout by 2doorpost
Sep 20, 2009 (11:47 am)
Reply
Looking for a second vehicle in the house.
 
Actually starting to see some C4C purchases in the classifieds already due to payment issues and / or buyer's remorse.
 C4C just might work for me after all..
#2593 of 2647
fallout by stickguy
Sep 20, 2009 (11:58 am)
Reply
well, depending on what you traded in, what you bought, and how good a deal you got, it si possible that someone might be able to turn a profit by flipping the new cr.
 
if you traded in a $300 POC, and got a killer deal on something that holds value (say, a civic), you might be able to resell the civic now with barely any miles, and take less than the $4500 C$C bonus in depreciation.
 
pay 17K, sell for 15K, still a couple grand ahead.
#2594 of 2647
Re: red herring [stickguy] by kdhspyder
Sep 20, 2009 (4:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: stickguy (Sep 20, 2009 8:25 am)

No, and yes partially. The main beneficiary of the increased level of business was the IRS. My income doubled in July and Aug over what it had been the prior 8 months. Ditto all my fellow sales people, F&I guys, aftermarket ladies, aftermarket vendors, truckmen, distribution people, etc, etc etc. If my income doubled .... Uncle Sam's income doubled too. So did all the states that have state income taxes.
 
Then there are the dealers and vehicle makers and all the suppliers to each of these two huge groups. Their business jumped by 30% so the IRS is due to receive a bunch of money on Oct-15 when the quarterly taxes are paid.
 
And yes the States did make out like bandits as 690,000 vehicles generated state sales taxes of about $700 million in a 6 week period. Windfall from the pockets of those that can afford it the most. The wealthy and well-organized.
 
The people that organized this and put it into motion were and are awfully awfully smart....and there's a lot of them.
#2595 of 2647
Motor Vehicle Fees on Clunkers by rik1
Sep 20, 2009 (8:10 pm)
Reply
Has anyone heard of being charged a MV Fee on the clunker? I paid an estimated MV Fee on my contract, which I assumed was for the new vehicle that I bought and expected a refund of the difference. When I received the check there was an extra $20 taken out which the salesman said was for the clunker vehicle (transfer of registration or something to that effect). I know its only $20, but its the principle.
 
Also, the salvage fees - is that something that's automatic, or something that should have been negotiated before and entered on the contract?
 
Thanks.
#2596 of 2647
Re: red herring [kdhspyder] by srs_49
Sep 21, 2009 (4:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Sep 20, 2009 4:25 pm)

If my income doubled .... Uncle Sam's income doubled too.
 
C'mon, Bob. You know better than that.
 
If your income doubles for 2 months of the year, and remains at the same, lower level for the other 10 months, then your annual income has only increased ~17%, which is what your taxes are based on.
#2597 of 2647
Re: A similar post may have appeared earlier, but... [euphonium] by ateixeira
Sep 21, 2009 (9:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: euphonium (Sep 19, 2009 10:08 pm)

Just 8.6 years to break even, wow.
 
Great deal when you put it that way.
 
Also, less demand on oil lowers energy costs and helps the entire economy.

Messages Page 260 of 265
1
...
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
...
265
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement