Sign In Join 



CX-9 Fuel Consumption/AC noise

8 messages,  Last post on Jun 01, 2009 at 7:32 AM

You are in the Mazda CX-9 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mazda CX-9, SUV


Messages Page 1 of 1
All Messages Displayed
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1 of 8
CX-9 Fuel Consumption/AC noise by gabby13
May 28, 2009 (6:28 am)
Reply
Got a new CX-9 Mazda 2 weeks ago with a full tank from the dealership. Drove 207 miles probably 70% in city and 30% highway before I refiled the tank with 15.66 gall. of fuel. The on board computer showed 13.3 miles/gall avg. fuel consumption. My computation was close to that at 13.5 gall/mile, this is really shocking, far below the stated 19miles/gall by Mazda.
My former Pilot was getting 20 miles/gall under the same driving condition. Is everybody witnessing the same performance?
Also when on Auto the A/C will work on high fan forever making a terrible noise that will interfere with the bluetooth hands free phone conversation and unless I lower the fan manually it will continue doing so even when seemingly the desired temperature is achieved. Again, the Pilot's A/C was so mush more quieter, what is the point in having a well noise insulated car if the A/C makes such a tremendous noise?
#2 of 8
Re: CX-9 Fuel Consumption/AC noise [gabby13] by tidester HOST
May 28, 2009 (9:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: gabby13 (May 28, 2009 6:28 am)

You'll want to visit Mazda CX-9 Real World MPG.
 
tidester, host
SUVs and Smart Shopper
#3 of 8
Re: CX-9 Fuel Consumption/AC noise [gabby13] by howardru
May 29, 2009 (3:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: gabby13 (May 28, 2009 6:28 am)

A/C noise is definately some type of problem with the car. Is the rear seat fan control on high? I find this a bit distracting when it's on high. This can be disabled.
 
As for MPG, it's a new car and I would expect the engine to be breaking in for a while. Pre-09 models did not have an MPG computer calculator and possibly this is by design(intention). However, many of us have found that we get between 18 and 22 MPG using the ScanGauge device that hooks up to the ODBII. There is a thread on this on this forum and the Mazda24/7 forum.
 
Also, could be the way you press the gas pedal. If you are one of those drivers who always accelerate, glide and re-accelerate you'll find you go through gas quickly. You may want to watch how you drive and use the gas pedal. Perhaps you can learn a few tricks on your own.
#4 of 8
Re: CX-9 Fuel Consumption/AC noise [howardru] by gabby13
May 29, 2009 (6:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: howardru (May 29, 2009 3:10 am)

Thank you for taking the time to reply. I do drive gently, am not the type of hard foot driver. I did go to the Mazda dealership and they suggested to wait till the car reaches 1000 miles to give the engine a chance to break in. The A/C makes the terrible noise from the front. Most of the time now I keep it on manual so I can adjust alone the fan and by lowering it the noise diminishes. I guess it will always cool slower this way but at least I can go quietly about other business in the car.
#5 of 8
My 2008 AWD gets 15-16MPG by not_2_shabby
May 29, 2009 (7:52 am)
Reply
I have been consistently getting 15 MPG in my CX-9 since I purchased it. One all highway trip I did hit 19.5 MPG. I'm getting 15 MPG in a 50/50 mix of driving. I'm very disappointed. I am experimenting with 92 octane fuel to see if it improves the MPG. Initial results show it might, but the weather has warmed up so it's hard to know if that is what has caused the improvement in my MPG.
#6 of 8
Re: My 2008 AWD gets 15-16MPG [not_2_shabby] by gabby13
May 29, 2009 (8:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: not_2_shabby (May 29, 2009 7:52 am)

TXS for taking the time to answer. Mine is a 2WD Grand Touring, I will wait till 1000 miles on the odometer to see again if the average improves.
#7 of 8
my points by ceric
May 29, 2009 (8:45 am)
Reply
I understand your frustration compared to your old pilot. Several things make CX9 have less MPG
- heavier (compared weight at least 300lb more)
- bigger engine (3.7 vs 3.5) and Honda is good at lean burning
- wider tires (245 vs 225/215)
- short 1st gear (much shorter than your Pilot - more puppy starting off)
- new - it gets better after 10000 miles
Mazda designed CX9 to be sporty (zoom-zoom), not king of MPG.
My 1st tank was 16.5 mixed driving. CX9 is more efficient on highways due to low drag (0.36) and tall 6th gear. I can easily get 22mpg (with AWD) travelling at 75mph+.
 
In short, to improve what you get now
- ease off at 1st gear
- time the lights (a common Prius technique)
- pump up your tire pressure to 35+ psi
- get rid of junks in your vehicle
- use of K&N filter helps a bit in city stop-n-go driving (not highway)
- use of synthetic may also help a bit (city and highway)
 
Vehicles work at the best when warmed (i.e. temp gauge at middle) in term of MPG also. The 1st couple miles are usually very bad since the vehicles need to warm up to operating temp ASAP so that emission control can reach a good state (heat up the CAT converter).
 
Go read the 2009 Pilot site/forum. They are not exactly getting very good MPG either in city driving. It comes with heavier new vehicles and tighter emission requirement (clean up emission ASAP).
 
Anyway, not to defend for CX9. CX9 is a great CUV with handling in mind, not super MPG. For the latter, Highlander is probably the best by 2mpg at least.
#8 of 8
Re: my points [ceric] by gabby13
Jun 01, 2009 (7:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: ceric (May 29, 2009 8:45 am)

Tank you for taking the time to answer.

Messages Page 1 of 1
All Messages Displayed
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement