Sign In Join 



2010 Cadillac CTS Sport Wagon

26 messages,  Last post on Nov 20, 2009 at 4:49 AM

You are in the Future Vehicles Forum. Your Host is kirstie_h

What is this discussion about? Cadillac CTS, Future Vehicle, Wagon


Messages Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#20 of 26
Prices by plawin1
Aug 19, 2009 (6:49 pm)
Reply
AWD adds about $2,000 to the sedan. It depends on who you pick for competition. The BMW 535xi wagon starts at $56,625. That doesn't include power tailgate, heated seats, and navigation. I haven't looked at the rest of the options, but Cadillac has been trying to beat BMW on price.
#21 of 26
Prices... by sevenfeet0
Aug 20, 2009 (6:24 pm)
Reply
The wagon adds $1000 to the cost of the car according to all reviews I've read on this vehicle. Outside of that, all standard CTS configurations remain the same except manual tranny availability. A $54K price is pretty much the whole hog 10" wheels FE3 suspension 3.6L DI model. If you want cheaper, start, whacking down the options list.
 
I have to admit, a CTS-V Wagon would be a wonderful car and yes, GM would probably sell maybe 50 of them. But as a father of two, I'd love an excuse to buy one. But the wagon market is small and the hotrod market is unfortunately even smaller. Mercedes has made an AMG E-class wagon up until the outgoing 2009 model year but the new 2010 E-class wagon hasn't been introduced yet, so no AMG model either. BMW doesn't make an M5 Touring for the US, and Audi doesn't import the S6 Avant either. Even Volvo stopped selling the Turbo R awhile ago. Curiously, up until recently you could get an Mercedes R-class people mover with an AMG engine on "special order", but no longer.
#22 of 26
Re: Prices... [sevenfeet0] by bhill2
Aug 21, 2009 (11:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: sevenfeet0 (Aug 20, 2009 6:24 pm)

But the wagon market is small and the hotrod market is unfortunately even smaller.
 
Sigh. I guess that means that the prospects for a CTS-V Sport Wagon are slim. Too bad; that would one helluva way to get the kids to school.
#23 of 26
Audi or Caddy Wagon? by b4z
Aug 21, 2009 (2:03 pm)
Reply
I'm also looking at the Audi A6 Avant 3.0T Supercharged. 30-50 times is 2.8seconds! 0-60 is about 1 second faster than the caddy and has 10cuft. more cargo space.
I would have to see what options I want on the caddy and then look for large incentives on the leasing side.
I am leaning towards a 3.6L Performance with the 19" Summer FE3 package and no sunroof.
#24 of 26
Re: Audi or Caddy Wagon? [b4z] by willbuyan09
Aug 24, 2009 (8:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: b4z (Aug 21, 2009 2:03 pm)

I have been (in)patiently waiting for the Sport Wagon. Also wondered about the A6 Avant, but isn't Audi updating the A6 for 2011?? I don't want the last year of a model.
#25 of 26
CTS-V Sport Wagon a go! by sevenfeet0
Nov 16, 2009 (5:12 pm)
Reply
Looks like the CTS-V will come in all flavors....sedan, coupe...and sport wagon.
 
http://www.caranddriver.com/news/car/09q4/bob_lutz_says_cadillac_cts-v_sport_wag- on_is_definitely_coming-car_news
#26 of 26
test drive by roho1
Nov 20, 2009 (4:49 am)
Reply
I recently had the opportunity to test drive a Sport wagon. The dealer just got 2 bright red models in. One was the premium version loaded to the gills at about 48k. It had Continental 19" tires on it. I drove the other one which was a more basic model with 17" Michelin tires, no nav, stickered at about 40k.
I'll preface this by saying I have never owned a Cadillac and probably never will. I was curious with the new wagon design but am leaning toward a Toyota Venza.
The first thing I noticed was a weird smell, the salesman said was the leather seats. I have never smelled leather like that before, it was more like some chemical laced Chinese yak hide. The whole interior wasn't too impressive, it reminded me of the Chevy Equinox I looked at awhile ago. One thing that was impressive was the driver's seat can be moved way back. I'm 6'-1" and always have to peg the seat as far back as it will go on any other vehicle. On this it will go back far enough I guess for any basketball player with room to spare.
It drove like I expected it would, the tranny was smooth and pickup was there. The rear vision is restricted by the dead zones on both sides. The side mirrors were too small from what I am used to, with the blind spots so I was not comfortable.
Overall I was underwhelmed especially for the price. It certainly did not ooze luxury as I expected.

Messages Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement