Subaru Outback vs. Toyota Venza

11 messages,  Last post on May 24, 2012 at 8:15 AM

You are in the Toyota Venza Forum.

What is this discussion about? Toyota Venza, Subaru Outback, Car Comparisons, Sedan, Wagon, SUV

#8 of 11 Subaru Outback vs. Toyota Venza by brioboy

May 10, 2012 (10:03 pm)

This forum is getting a bit old but I have had the same dilemma - if my 06 Highlander Hybrid packed it up one way or another, which to choose? I don't realy like the bigger size of the new Highlanders. My Toyota service manager has acknowledged that Venza AWD comes in a poor second to Outback in snow and ice - all Subarus are AWD and better clearance. Perfect for us at Whistler.

#9 of 11 Re: Subaru Outback vs. Toyota Venza [brioboy] by ksayers

May 23, 2012 (9:09 pm)

Replying to: brioboy (May 10, 2012 10:03 pm)
Here's another point to consider... if you are in snow/ice often, and need to buy tires for the Venza, check the rim size. Be prepared to shell out about $17-1800 for 4 decent tires, installed. I am sure the graphic artists and 17 year olds like 20 inch rims but they come with a heavy price tag.

#10 of 11 Re: Subaru Outback vs. Toyota Venza [brioboy] by jeffm5

May 24, 2012 (7:45 am)

Replying to: brioboy (May 10, 2012 10:03 pm)
I respect your opinion brioboy, but the pre 2010 Outbacks never appealed to me. I had a 2000 & 2004 Forester, which were good cars. I traded the 04 for a 2010 OB, cross shopping a Venza. I'm a Toyota fan, having had 3 including a 2005 Avalon, the best sedan I've ever owned. (Still have it.) The Venza was more car than we needed and much more expensive. The 2010 is a great all around performer. Decent power, very good fuel economy, comfortable. The AWD performance is first rate. Just a difference of opinion. Enjoy your rides.

#11 of 11 Re: Subaru Outback vs. Toyota Venza [brioboy] by wwest

May 24, 2012 (8:15 am)

Replying to: brioboy (May 10, 2012 10:03 pm)
"..all Subarus are AWD....."
 
Yes, but which type, implementation? Subaru seems to have about 3 versions of AWD depending on the model. The WRX, for instance, has a totally non-functional VC implementation of F/AWD, absent the TC "off" capability it likely wouldn't be functional at all on the slippery stuff.
 
"..and better clearance..."
 
Again, depends on the model.....
 
If wish to buy a truly SAFE and fully functional "awd" then look to the R/awd systems. None of those have need to re-apportion engine torque to the rear, AWAY from the front, such that directional control can be maintained or asserted.
To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement