Article Comments - 2010 Ford Mustang GT vs. 2009 Nissan 370Z

22 messages, Last post on Sep 19, 2009 at 6:00 PM

You are in the Ford Mustang Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Ford Mustang, Nissan 370Z, Coupe

2010 Ford Mustang GT vs. 2009 Nissan 370Z - Go ahead; pick a car, any car. Both of them will reach 60 mph in 5.2 seconds (4.9 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip). (more)

Outline

Messages Page 2 of 3: 1; 2; 3; Prev; Next; Last

#3 of 22 Z vs. Genesis by tjbeck Mar 12, 2009 (4:24 am)
OK, let's have Mustang or Z vs. Genesis (as long as we're going with a 2-seater vs. a 2+2). Throw in an RX-8 for fun.
#4 of 22 135i defender by PDXLager Mar 12, 2009 (9:39 am)
Jason, I wouldn't exactly say the 370Z put a "drubbing" on the 135i, unless almost identical performance results in every test, with the Z edging on style and the 135i better on overall MPG, is what you would define as a "drubbing". (edit: actually, the Z probably does have better overall MPG, I must have been thinking highway numbers for the 135i....still a close test comparison though!) At first I was wondering if it was accurate to call the Z a legend, then I remembered the Datsun Fairlady. Point Datsun!
#5 of 22 Re: Should of had a V8 [intothewest] by mugwomp Mar 14, 2009 (7:26 am)
Replying to: intothewest (Mar 11, 2009 1:33 pm) The way it sounds? You've got to be joking... They may not as well do performance car comparison reviews. Edumunds can just have automakers send in audio samples of their cars for comparisons from now on. Genius... Replies to this message: stingray454 (Mar 17, 2009 7:09 am)
#6 of 22 Re: Should of had a V8 [mugwomp] by stingray454 Mar 17, 2009 (7:09 am)
Replying to: mugwomp (Mar 14, 2009 7:26 am) Don't kid yourself - the way a sports car engine sounds can be a big influence on purchase decision for some buyers. I'm one for example. I own an '02 Z06 with aftermarket Corsa Indy exhaust and long tube headers, and I LOVE the sound of my car. I love Vipers too, but the V-10 in those cars sounds so flat and crappy (like a UPS truck on steroids, or a Hoover having sex with a tuba), that I don't think I would ever own one because of it. Even if the Viper is faster. Anyway, back to the topic: I would buy the Mustang if it were my only car, because it is much more practical. I would get the 370Z if I had a daily driver to go with it.
#7 of 22 Re: Should of had a V8 [intothewest] by 2006vr6 Apr 13, 2009 (5:13 am)
Replying to: intothewest (Mar 11, 2009 1:33 pm) I would also have to go w/ the new 2010 Stang. I just don't like to feel like I'm driving in a bath tub. What I'm referring to is the high belt line of the Z. I have better control & avoidance when I sit a little high in the saddle. This goes with a sedan, coupe, or convertible. I miss my 1993 5.0 LX and looked at getting another Stang in 06. Interior and amenities just didn't do it for me. Hence my 06 Passat VR6 4Motion w/ Sports Pack #2 Ride that still puts a smile on my face; when the feeling hits. May have to give the 2010 convertible a test run as the interior has been upgraded per all of the mag & web writings. Who knows? Better yet - Maybe an affordable Terlingua Stang is in Ford's Racing/SVT division as well as mine. Sorry Z fans, I'm afraid this would be a slam dunk. Bang for buck muscle and world class road handling sport combo may be round the corner.
#8 of 22 z fan here but like the new mustang more by alman08 Apr 25, 2009 (11:16 am)
i have always been a z fan but after reading much about the 10 mustang and seeing it in person, i now like mustang more and more, especially in the convt form. i notice many car manufactures are now using diff size tires front vs. back on their sport cars, but really, would that make a car handle that much better on daily use? I personally wouldn't know because the only time I took a car to a race track was on my 93 MR2 Turbo. But not being able to rotate the tires on a car would be a disadvantage to me. I have a 02 ford explorer and the first set of tires last me 90k miles having them rotated at every 5000k miles oil change. the interior seemed to be a much improvement on the 10 model over the 09. I remember comparing the 350z with the 08 mustang's interior at the car show, and i was thinking, "why would anyone spent this kind of money on a car with this kind of crappy plastic on the interior" about the mustang. although the Z was all plastic also, it was a better quality plastic. now if i can get a GT premium convt at $500 under invoice... Replies to this message: 2006vr6 (Apr 27, 2009 5:46 am) alman08 (May 02, 2009 8:12 pm)
#9 of 22 Re: z fan here but like the new mustang more [alman08] by 2006vr6 Apr 27, 2009 (5:46 am)
Replying to: alman08 (Apr 25, 2009 11:16 am) Yes; different front and back tire sizes do make a difference. This can also be said of the tires that need to stay on the same side. 90K on one set of tires is amazing. Best I've gotten was around high 60's w/ a set of Yokohama's on a light Impreza. Sold the car with them on it and got the price I wanted. Tires really make a car ride and handle. Kind of important and depends on your geographical location (rain/winter/road conditions) and the suspension/damping setup of your ride. A taunt suspension ride can be softened by increasing sidewall height for bad road condition driving (winter states) is an example. Thinking your 02 Explorer was right around the time of their big Firestone recall. I've always liked Firestone. Good tire for a reasonable buck. Think replacements were Goodyear. Buying a new car is a great experience. You should be able to locate your Stang of choice for the price you want. Good Luck!! Replies to this message: alman08 (May 02, 2009 8:12 pm)
#10 of 22 Re: z fan here but like the new mustang more [2006vr6] by alman08 May 02, 2009 (8:12 pm)
Replying to: 2006vr6 (Apr 27, 2009 5:46 am) my 02 was after the big firestone recall you mentioned. the OEM were michelin, and now i have a set of hankook on the car, which are very good too. about the stang... have yet to find a dealer that would do under invoice on new stangs especially a convt. it doesn't bother me though because even though this isn't a brand new remade-from-ground-up model, i might be able to get one that's made later this year that wouldn't have much of the new car glitches on it.
#11 of 22 2010 Mustang GT Premium with track package Vs GT with 3.73 gear package? by jmaroun Aug 16, 2009 (9:38 pm)
I'm pretty sold on the new 2010 Stang GT and I'll be buying in a day or two. I'd appreciate some experienced and knowledgeable advice on a few questions. First I'd like to say that I found the GT's interior cleaner than the GT Premium's Sure the Premium comes with more bells and whistles but I found that Premium's steering wheel slippier than the regular GTs. Also the silver aluminum stripes on the Premium's steering wheel get hot and a little sticky..they aren't pleasing to the touch. To me, a steering feel is a simple yet important part of a car and I'd prefer the regular GT one. That's one thing. Secondly, leather isn't really my thing..I found the GT's cloth seats very comfortable and cooler (temperature wise). Thirdly..I'm pretty concerned about the gadgetry that comes with the steering package..The more electronic stuff, the more things can go wrong. I wasn't too impressed with all the chrome and black plastic, especially surrounding the door speakers. Power seats and sunroof just add weight ..I wonder how much though..I could probably live with all of these gripes providing there is a real performance advantage with the GT Premium over the GT. The most important concern I have is whether the track package which only comes in the GT Premium, is well worth living with my dislikes listed above. I will certainly order the 3.73 rear gear ratio package which is offered in the normal GT. I believe the 3.73 rear gear package also comes with the same limited slip differential as what would come with a GT Premium with the track package. The track package comes with modified suspension parts and tunning which is only offered with Premium cars. Is this significant enough from a performance point of view? A question the sales rep simply didn't know the answer to. In a nut shell, is the track package that comes in the GT Premium worth me switching from a GT with 3.73 gear package?? Please answer if you know .. soon. Thanks. Joseph San Diego Replies to this message: 2006vr6 (Aug 17, 2009 5:11 am) tayl0rd (Aug 17, 2009 5:20 am)
#12 of 22 Re: 2010 Mustang GT Premium with track package Vs GT with 3.73 gear package? [jmaroun] by 2006vr6 Aug 17, 2009 (5:11 am)
Replying to: jmaroun (Aug 16, 2009 9:38 pm) The ring & pinion gear set makes the greatest difference when going from light to light or in the 1/4 mile. A slight change to the induction would help some as well to make the engine breath a little cooler. She will run hotter with the 373. You probably have hit on the quickest stang for the least dough. I bought a 93 LX 5.0 manual in 93 and put in the 373 gear set. I could smell the difference as the engine heated up much faster. I think the setup you mentioned would ride smoother - not as harsh as the track pack. But this package gives you a whole lot - including the larger mags and wheels which probably cost more than the package, & other items you may want to consider. Sometimes the mags themselves aren't as appealing with an upgraded trim level or package. But - Weight is the drag inhibitor - so your thinking could have some surprises for premium GT's. Custom order you baby, and make her yours - just what you want. She will put a smile on your face for a very long time.