Sign In Join 



All-New 2010 Legacy/Outback?

676 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 7:40 AM

You are in the Subaru Legacy & Outback Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Legacy, Subaru Outback, Subaru Forester, Car Buying, Car Comparisons, Sedan, Wagon


Messages Page 62 of 68
1
...
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
...
68
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#610 of 676
Re: Factory roof rack replaced with tracks. [tee_el_cee] by xwesx
Oct 30, 2009 (10:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: tee_el_cee (Oct 29, 2009 4:40 pm)

Thanks for the link! That was a great read.
 
I fully agree with you Brian. That new rack was change for the sake of change rather than improvement.
#611 of 676
Re: rack FAIL [bkaiser1] by ateixeira
Nov 03, 2009 (1:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bkaiser1 (Oct 30, 2009 7:52 am)

Hey Brian.
 
I thought the spread was actually 30"?
 
October sales are out - Outback outsold the Forester for the first time in years. Both are way up, though.
#612 of 676
Re: rack FAIL [ateixeira] by rschleicher
Nov 03, 2009 (6:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Nov 03, 2009 1:13 pm)

I think the front-to-back spacing between the stock cross-bars when they are in the cross-position is 30".
 
But, for people who want to mount their own crossbars (and leave the stock rack in its "stowed" position), the exposed length of the stowed bars is only about 21" or so. (This is if you were wanting to mount your own cross bars to the stowed bars, using them as the rails.)
 
If you look at the design of the stock 2010 rails, they could have positioned the rails such that they were farther apart than 30" in the crossed position. I don't know why the designers thought that a 30" spacing was optimal.
#613 of 676
Re: rack FAIL [rschleicher] by xwesx
Nov 03, 2009 (6:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rschleicher (Nov 03, 2009 6:06 pm)

I suspect it is because, when stowed, the 30" spacing allows the "rails" to appear symmetrical. If they had wider spacing when deployed, one bar would be located further toward the back of one rail while the other would be located further forward. Now, we wouldn't want the rails looking awkward, would we?
#614 of 676
Re: rack FAIL [xwesx] by rschleicher
Nov 04, 2009 (6:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: xwesx (Nov 03, 2009 6:26 pm)

xwesx,
 
Yes, I think you're right. In order to have the start and end points of the two rails line up, the geometry of the pivoting racks leads to a 30" front to back spacing.
 
On the other hand, since only part of the stowed rail is exposed/visible from the side, you'd hardly notice if the end points were staggered a bit to increase the rail spacing.
 
Who knows, maybe they were also worried about having them too far apart for some purposes....
#615 of 676
Re: rack FAIL [ateixeira] by bkaiser1
Nov 05, 2009 (7:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Nov 03, 2009 1:13 pm)

You're right -- the f/r spread is 30". I misread the part of the article that referred to the "spread" as being 21" -- he meant width there.
 
From the article:
"Bad news now–the crossbar spread for the above options are an almost pointless 21″–less than you will need for boards or boats over 8′, and too narrow for any cargo baskets or boxes."
 
Still, even with a 30" spread, I think this rack is a major step back for Subaru, and a major eyesore on an otherwise appealing car. What's more, this big plastic rack HAS to cost them more to make than the old rails, which were more practical.
 
Brian
#616 of 676
Re: rack FAIL [bkaiser1] by ateixeira
Nov 05, 2009 (9:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: bkaiser1 (Nov 05, 2009 7:38 am)

Thanks for clarifying.
 
There's always the Forester.
#617 of 676
Re: rack FAIL [ateixeira] by cdndriver
Nov 06, 2009 (7:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Nov 05, 2009 9:02 am)

I was in for my last service on my 07 Legacy wagon. It comes off lease soon. I had a good look at the OB. I think what they did to offset the costs of making it bigger, wider, higher, etc. was to cheapen things like the mirrors, heat settings for the seats, and other things: the tiny sunroof, and so on. Though I kind of like the dash, I am not impressed with the rest of it. I even spotted a paint run on the mirror.
One of the service guys told me they had a seminar with company reps and after driving them for an hour, they had a big meeting. He said the service guys blasted the reps about the things we've been talking about. And they really hated the electronic E-brake. (apparently, if your battery dies, you have to stick some lever under the car to release the brake). That sounds safe!
Anyway, I was looking at the Forester. To equip it close to what my wagon has, I'd need the Touring package, which brings the cost above what my Legacy was when I leased it. Around: 30 grand.
I'm not sure if I'll do it.
I'm also looking at the Volvo V50, and the Saab 9-3 wagon, though they're more, and really hard to find here. GM Canada isn't bringing any more in since they're selling the division.(which doesn't particularly inspire confidence).
so I'm not sure what to do. I asked about finding an 090 Legacy wagon, but the guy said there aren't many and they wouldn't lease one anyway.
so it's back to the research.....
cdndriver...
I think Subie really burned a lot of people on this one.
#618 of 676
Real world experience with 2010 OB 3.6R Limited? by britgeezer
Nov 07, 2009 (7:53 pm)
Reply
If we can get past comments about the roof rack ... What is the real world experience with this car/wagon/ SUV?
 
We recently had the chance to drive one, together with many competing products, with the intent to replace our Jeep Cherokee Limited (4.7v8) and were very impressed.
 
We have had bad experience with other high end intelligent AWD systems (FX-45) and this vehicle seemed a good compromise.
 
Any comments out there on owning a 2010 model?
 
OK, if you want a moan; the exterior color, wheel and headlight options are dummer than a 1st year marketing person on their first day might choose, but if we try and and get past that ....
 
What's the vote?
 
Thanks
 
BG
#619 of 676
Aftermarket tire size for 2010 OB Limited. by 204meca
Nov 07, 2009 (8:27 pm)
Reply
I am looking for the best AS performance tire for my new Outback Ltd which is due to arrive in about a month. Ideally I would like better handling in the dry & wet without significant compromise of the smooth quiet ride. Also I encounter 5-10 days of winter driving in conditions -- more ice than snow - & would like to have & better winter traction better winter traction that OEM tires.
  
Based on Novembers Consumer Reports results & Tire Racks owners surveys, the Michelin Primacy MXV4 appears to be superior to the any other tires for my driving needs. It appears to simply has the best balance of any AS tires including superior ice braking & low. Goodyear Triple Treads sound good, but not equal to the MXV4. The only hang up is that the Primacy MXV4 does not come in a 17" 60 series.
 
The overall diameter difference between the Michelin 235/55 -17 tire & the Conti OEM 225/60-17 is 0.4" (27.6" for 60 series & 27.4" for 55 series) or 1.4%. The difference between section width is 0.3" of 3.1%. The difference in revolutions / mile is only 11 or 1.4%.
 
I assume that the fitment of the 55 series on the 2010 OB is very unlikely to pose any problems given that the tread depth is over 0.3" so that there will be that much varience in the wear anyway. Since the Michelin has lower rolling resistance I assume that any loss of mpg due to the slightly smaller size will be made up in the reduced rolling resistance. Perhaps the ride may be slightly firmer due to the shorter side wall of the 55 series tire, but at the trade off of slightly better handling.
 
All that said I can't see a downside to going to the 235/55 tire Michelin which appears to be the best all around performance all season; and should not present any problems for my 2010 OB.
 
  Am I missing anything here?

Messages Page 62 of 68
1
...
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
...
68
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement