Sign In Join 

All-New 2010 Legacy/Outback?

706 messages,  Last post on Dec 09, 2009 at 7:52 AM

You are in the Subaru Legacy & Outback Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Legacy, Subaru Outback, Subaru Forester, Car Buying, Car Comparisons, Sedan, Wagon


Messages Page 57 of 72
1
...
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
...
72
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#554 of 706
2010 Legacy GT by perrito
Oct 19, 2009 (9:04 am)
Reply
OK, sounds nice, apart from the larger,flabbier proportions. The GT is just now...a little too big. The other aspect I really miss from Edmunds reviews is the "old" Stereo Review theme -- why did that ever get dropped? A minor point, but man it just bugs me!
#555 of 706
Re: Cargo nets & all weather floor mats [eps105] by xwesx
Oct 19, 2009 (9:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: eps105 (Oct 19, 2009 7:01 am)

I debated getting the nets and eventually decided against it. I figured they would be in the way more than they were used. The floor mats are pretty good; definitely worth the cost (even at retail) because they are quite inexpensive and are contoured to the vehicle. That said, I have purchased MacNeil WeatherTech FloorLiners for my last two Subaru vehicles. These offer much better protection of the floor area than can be done with a floor-only mat. The front liners are especially well-done; while the rear liner works but tends to move around (at least with a five-year-old using it) a little, thereby allowing rocks, etc., to get between the back of the liner and the front of the carpeted area below the rear seat. The drawback is that the Floorliner costs $160 for front and back; I think the fronts are $100 if purchased separately.
#556 of 706
Re: 2010 Outback Navigation System [eps105] by ateixeira
Oct 19, 2009 (10:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: eps105 (Oct 19, 2009 6:52 am)

Very, very nice.
 
So it has trajectory lines, that would have been my next question. I don't think the Tribeca got those, so this system is better than that flagship's. The screen is also an inch bigger, 8" vs. 7". I think the Forester's is 6.5".
 
Finally Subaru is truly offering some value for the money.
#557 of 706
Can the 2010 Outback tow? by wtd44
Oct 19, 2009 (10:38 am)
Reply
I am quite interested in the OB for 2010, and am wondering if the factory equips them for towing. A visit to a really big dealership on a day when they were closed gave me the idea that towing may not be available.
#558 of 706
Re: Can the 2010 Outback tow? [wtd44] by ateixeira
Oct 19, 2009 (10:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: wtd44 (Oct 19, 2009 10:38 am)

Of course it can. Bob will have the details on the capacities...
#559 of 706
Re: Can the 2010 Outback tow? [wtd44] by eps105
Oct 19, 2009 (11:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: wtd44 (Oct 19, 2009 10:38 am)

Forgive me for editorializing, but doesn't anybody read the sales brochures or look at the Subaru websites before posting questions on message boards? There are so many questions on these boards with people asking about availability of options and specs for things that are clearly laid out in the official literature.
 
(End rant)
 
Sorry about that... Anyway, the Outback is rated to tow 1,000 pounds without trailer brakes and 2,700 lb with brakes, with the 4 cyl engine; and 3,000 lbs with trailer brakes with the H6.
 
I ordered the hitch from the factory, it's a 1.25" hitch. It is nicely integrated into the bumper. If you want 2", you have to go aftermarket.
 
It's very uncommon for the cars on the lot to be equipped from the factory. My dealer was willing to let me order my Outback without a deposit until I told him I wanted the hitch, then he said I'd have to give him $500 nonrefundable deposit. So not seeing hitches at a big dealer doesn't mean they're no available.
#560 of 706
Re: Can the 2010 Outback tow? [wtd44] by rsholland
Oct 19, 2009 (11:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: wtd44 (Oct 19, 2009 10:38 am)

2700 for H4 and 3000 for H6, if you have trailer brakes. No trailer brakes and it's 1000 across the board; which is a restriction that's typical for most brands, be it car, SUV or truck.
 
Bob
#561 of 706
Re: Edmunds test 2010 Legacy 2.5 GT [rsholland] by ateixeira
Oct 19, 2009 (12:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rsholland (Oct 19, 2009 7:26 am)

Pretty good review, though I felt like Edmunds was unusually hard on it, for some reason.
 
The numbers are phenomenal. Acceleration and braking beat not only the old spec.B, but also the MazdaSpeed6. And keep in mind those were both special edition tuner cars, this 2.5GT Limited is not.
 
Watch the video, then the video of the Speed6. vs previous Legacy GT comes up. Watch both.
 
The new Legacy has significantly less body roll in the slalom. Braking from 60mph is 13 feet shorter. They say the shifter linkage has improved.
 
Yet the tone of the article is critical. I don't get it.
#562 of 706
Re: Elliot [rsholland] by eps105
Oct 19, 2009 (12:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rsholland (Oct 19, 2009 7:08 am)

Thanks Bob for telling me that you updated the post. I never would have seen that otherwise as it was relegated to the previous page.
 
I'd be curious as to how it compares with a Garmin. I think you may have mentioned that before, but maybe not in too much detail? Obviously any portable NAVI units will be significantly cheaper, and the maps may be more up to date, as with the POIs. Can you elaborate a bit more on the portable vs. in-dash Subie NAVI units? It's easy for those of us who have not "lived" with an in-dash unit, to scoff at it, but I believe you also have a portable GPS unit. So your hands-on experience with both would be very helpful. Thanks.
 
I have a 3-year old Garmin Nuvi 360. I couldn't possibly put in writing here every difference, and each person has different needs anyway, so I'll try to summarize....
 
First off, someone coming from a Garmin is going to hate the Outback nav -- at first. The user interface appears to be not as elegant or refined. After playing with it for a while (hours), what I found is that different is not necessarily worse. It's just, well, different. The user interface and menu structure requires a learning curve because it's not copied from Garmin, so Garmin users will at first feel it in unintuitive. Once you learn where everything is, and figure out how to program points of interests and waypoints, and decipher all of the meanings of the different icons on the screen, and learn the quirky way to set up your favorite destinations and select a state to search in, it actually works very, very well.
 
The Subaru nav excells at quick startup, loud and friendly speech, and a feature called "QuickPOI" that shows common nearby destinations on the screen that you can click on while driving, like gas stations, and get detailed info about them and even call using Bluetooth. It also benefits from the giant screen by having split screen features and a handy zoomed-in inlay for your next turn.
 
The POI database is extensive, consuming 3 DVD's, so there's more types of POI's than a Garmin. It's more like the yellow pages.
 
The voice activation capability is also extensive, but the instructions on use are really, really poorly documented in the manual so you just need to play with it to understand. The voice activation lets you do most functions even when driving.
 
So the only things I liked better with my Garmin are the text-to-speech (not a big loss since the road name is in front of you in the Outback), 3-D view (turns out I'm starting to like the 2-D view better anyway), and of course the portability.
 
Price remains a factor, but as I've said many times on these boards -- if you can afford the $2000, you'll appreciate the complete integration of audio with the nav, bluetooth, MP3, radio as well as the rear camera, all playing nice through the speakers and using the steering wheel controls. It's still expensive though but with technology trickle-down, I bet we start to see systems like this closer to $1300 in the next few years now that Bluetooth and rear cameras are starting to become standard equipment in many cars.
 
OK, I've said as much as can. I totally need to get back to my day job! \
 
Peace out,
 
Elliot
#563 of 706
Re: Elliot [eps105] by rsholland
Oct 19, 2009 (12:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: eps105 (Oct 19, 2009 12:14 pm)

I recently got a Garmin 1490T, with the larger 5" screen. This is my first GPS, so I'm still in the process of learning it. I've said all along that I really appreciate the fully integrated NAVI units, for the very reasons you elaborated on.
 
The 1490T is pretty good. It does have Bluetooth and free traffic. The Bluetooth is really appreciated—but there's no phonebook, which I find really frustrating, The free traffic is just so-so at best. I could subscribe to an MSN (?) traffic source, but I'm too cheap. It's also got an "Eco Drive" function, which so far seem more like a gimmick than a useful feature. Finally, it's nowhere as elegant as having a built-in GPS, that's fully integrated with the car's functions.
 
I too just started using the 2-D viewing, and I seem to prefer that over the 3-D screen.
 
Bob

Messages Page 57 of 72
1
...
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
...
72
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement