Sign In Join 



All-New 2010 Legacy/Outback?

679 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 5:44 PM

You are in the Subaru Legacy & Outback Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Legacy, Subaru Outback, Subaru Forester, Car Buying, Car Comparisons, Sedan, Wagon


Messages Page 14 of 69
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
69
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#128 of 679
Re: Drove a 2.5 GT Limited today [rsholland] by ecotrklvr
Jul 07, 2009 (10:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: rsholland (Jul 07, 2009 4:14 am)

Sounds like you've got a pretty nice ride already. Enjoy it.
#129 of 679
Re: Anyone seen a 2010 Outback with a 6-speed? [seabrook7039] by rsholland
Jul 07, 2009 (10:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: seabrook7039 (Jul 07, 2009 9:55 am)

Ummm... The manual tranny in the new Legacy and Outback is also new. New = 6-speed, old = 5-speed; so the jury is out there too.
 
CVTs are gaining popularity with a number of carmakers, so I'm not that concerned about the reliability issue. Also, Subaru is a very conservative company. I seriously doubt that they would risk their excellent and hard-earned reputation on a CVT if they had any concerns about it.
 
I'm guessing the CVT will match or better the 6-speed in acceleration.
 
Bob
#130 of 679
Re: Drove a 2.5 GT Limited today [dbt] by ecotrklvr
Jul 07, 2009 (10:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: dbt (Jul 06, 2009 6:01 am)

Guess you and I are different. When I drive a stick shift vehicle on-road, I steer with my left hand (so I can shift with my right) until I get it into top gear. Then I can switch to two hands or left or right. That's so I never find myself driving along on the freeway in 4th by mistake (like some). So far, I haven't forgotten what gear I'm in while shifting up, either.
 
Tell me, how does one steer with the right hand while driving a stick? In the US, and not in a JDM vehicle?
#131 of 679
Re: Drove a 2.5 GT Limited today [ecotrklvr] by rsholland
Jul 07, 2009 (11:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: ecotrklvr (Jul 07, 2009 10:45 am)

Years ago, I should say decades ago, I was taught not to keep my hand on the gear shift lever all the time, as resting your hand there could cause undo wear-and-tear on the tranny. Not sure if that's true, but that's what I was taught. So, as such, my right hand is always moving back and forth from the steering wheel to the gear shift, as the driving situation dictates.
 
Granted, if you keep your hand there "all the time," you likely wouldn't forget what gear you're in; but that's not how I drive.
 
Bob
#132 of 679
Re: Drove a 2.5 GT Limited today [rsholland] by ecotrklvr
Jul 07, 2009 (1:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rsholland (Jul 07, 2009 11:12 am)

I was taught not to rest the hand on the gearshift either, except when you know you're going to be upshifting quite soon. Which is your point - with a 6-speed, unless you're above 50-60mph, you just leave it in 5th, or even 4th going down a 35 mph street. Never had to deal with that one yet. If the 6-speed Outback can be gotten hold of, I'll test drive one.
 
If the 6-speed could actually get the same mileage, and could be had for $800-1000 less, I'd take it.
 
The big no-no is driving with left foot resting on the clutch pedal. Nothing good comes of that.
#133 of 679
Re: Driving the CVT vs. 6-speed manual [204meca] by gmginsfo
Jul 09, 2009 (10:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: 204meca (Jul 03, 2009 11:55 am)

My thoughts exactly. Saw and drove - thru the lot only, since I'm not yet buying - a 2010 Outback at Nielsen Subaru/Mitsu in Portage, IN yesterday, and was very impressed. They've really upsized the Outback and Forester since I bought my '03 Forester - for the better, to my mind. Memo to everyone like me who's "going to wait a bit:" don't wait too long - the federal sales tax credit applies - so far - only to cars bought by 12-31-09. Still wondering what the sunroof configuration for the new Outback will be, since the one I saw had none; dual or single monster?
#134 of 679
Re: Driving the CVT vs. 6-speed manual [gmginsfo] by rsholland
Jul 09, 2009 (11:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: gmginsfo (Jul 09, 2009 10:46 am)

The moonroof is smaller, like that found on the Legacy sedan. So, no more mega-moonroof.
 
Bob
#135 of 679
Unimpressed..... by aviboy97
Jul 09, 2009 (2:00 pm)
Reply
....That about sums it up for me....
 
First, they styling is down right horrible and the body design has no continuity. This goes for both sedan and the Outback.
 
The materials used in the previous generation Legacy/Outback were much much better. The whole interior is hard plastic in this latest rendition. I find the center of the dash obtrusive and hideous.
 
I drove a 2.5i with the automatic transmission and power delivery was virtually identical to the previous generation. It had 16" alloys on it that make it look like it was riding on doughnuts. ugh...
 
One thing that confuses me is the size of the Outback. It's larger in mass then a Forester, yet, sits lower on the ground and it costs more. It almost seems as if Subaru is canabolizing it's own sales.....
 
I have had so many people come to my Subaru store and express their displeasure with it. This is not a good sign....
#136 of 679
Re: Unimpressed..... [aviboy97] by rsholland
Jul 09, 2009 (3:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (Jul 09, 2009 2:00 pm)

So you sell Subarus?
 
The ground clearance of the Outback and the Forester are the same.
 
Bob
#137 of 679
Impressed by nwbear
Jul 09, 2009 (9:23 pm)
Reply
I test drove a 2010 Outback and came back impressed. I like the design of both the interior and exterior, but the interior without the fake wood is a bit too industrial for my tastes. While not the best example of the species, the fake wood warms things up a bit. There is a marked improvement in the comfort of the leather seats over the cloth ones, I too noticed the hard plastic dash, but since I generally try to restrain myself from caressing the dash it isn't too important to me. Of more importance are the surfaces I actually touch when I'm using (not cleaning) the vehicle.
 
What I really enjoyed was the engine/CVT combo. There seemed to be plenty of power on tap and at highway cruising speeds the engine dropped below 2000 rpm. The programming of the CVT seems very well sorted out. Road noise was significant, but not objectionable. Ride quality was good.
 
My only complaint with the engine was noticeable vibration at idle. There is none in the bigger Toyota Venza 4. The ride, interior and exterior are much better than the Venza however. I'm still trying to figure out which planet the Venza came from. The way too big 20 inch wheels on the Venza also contribute to a truck like ride.
 
All in all the Outback is the front runner in the early stages of my search for a new 4 wheel drive road vehicle. The Forester would be of consideration too if they got rid of that damn 4 speed auto and replaced it with the CVT. Depending on dealer discounts and/or rebates (admittedly unlikely on a brand new model) I may be driving an Outback soon.

Messages Page 14 of 69
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
69
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement