You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
Cash for Clunkers - Good or Bad Idea?
4110 messages, Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 11:42 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
For questions about how the program works or to discuss program details, please visit our discussion titled, "Cash for Clunkers - Does it Work for You?"
|
Replying to: nbdeuce (Nov 02, 2009 6:35 pm) Hello and if your premise is ture, then what do you suppose the reason is that so many companies and entrepreneurs are leaving the US? ( There have been many articles in the mainstream press such as Barons providing detail ) I for one would love to live in a country where government is much smaller so politicians are irrelevent in our lives. Poly: (many) Tics: (parasites) |
|
|
Replying to: nbdeuce (Nov 02, 2009 6:35 pm) I immediately went to Google and found this in 3 seconds... http://seekingalpha.com/article/63131-exxon-s-2007-tax-bill-30-billion I'm pretty sure that Exxon's tax payment in 2007 of $30 billion (that's $30,000,000,000) is a record, exceeding the $28 billion it paid last year. By the way, Exxon pays taxes at a rate of 41% on its taxable income! |
|
|
Replying to: kdhspyder (Nov 02, 2009 8:27 pm) I guess the next thing you'll try and have me swallow is that crude hit $140+/barrel due to supply and demand, correct????? Back to C4C's for a moment... I love how Ford yesterday presented itself as the only one not receiving bail-out money....What in the world was cash for clunkers all about???? You may want to also Google how much corporate taxes Ford as paid since 9-11. Or I can just tell you!
|
|
|
Replying to: kdhspyder (Nov 02, 2009 8:27 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: nbdeuce (Nov 03, 2009 3:08 am) Companies only pay income tax when they make an annual profit. If they sell $20B of goods but they spend $20B to do so, yes they pay no income tax. But consider that all the $20B they spent went to wages for all their employees who pay tax and social security and medicare taxes, and the company matches those taxes, and the property taxes of their buildings. So a company that pays no income tax still pays plenty in taxes. And yes I agree that Exxon does pay a lot in taxes, and royalties to drill and move the oil.
|
|
|
Replying to: kernick (Nov 03, 2009 7:40 am) |
|
|
This is a pretty good summary of the CFC program and some good reasons why we should not even think about doing this program again. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091104/ap_on_bi_ge/us_cash_for_clunkers Regards, DQ |
|
|
Replying to: newdavidq (Nov 04, 2009 2:30 pm) A lot of old Ford pickups were traded on new Ford pickups... uh... wasn't this the idea? And, as a bonus, that is a USA based manufacturer benefiting! 14,000 transactions seem to have violated the rules.. 2% of the total... um... okay.. Was it a good idea? Can't tell from this article... BONUS They quoted Edmunds' CEO..
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
Cash for Clunkers - Good or Bad Idea?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats