You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
Cash for Clunkers - Good or Bad Idea?

4110 messages, Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 11:42 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
For questions about how the program works or to discuss program details, please visit our discussion titled, "Cash for Clunkers - Does it Work for You?"
|
|
|---|---|
|
do Americans have the attention span of a gerbil? Here we are in a HUGE financial mess and I see some media commentators suggesting we do the same exact things that got us so screwed up in the first place. As if the past 8 years never happened. Unbelievable, simply unbelievable. Hey, ONE BRIGHT SPOT! --- The new Camaro is a big hit (so far). This model, in one month, outsold the entire Buick or Cadillac division. $60 billion? That's only 6.5 months in Iraq and might be worth hundreds of thousands of jobs. Relatively speaking, a good gamble. I don't think many people realize the utter, total catastrophe of the annihilation of GM, should it have happened suddenly and without preparation. I would hazard to say that even civil unrest would not have been out of the realm of possibility.
|
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jul 10, 2009 7:48 am) I'm not sure I buy into that. The country survived layoffs and the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs in the aerospace industry back in the early 90s because of mergers and defense cutbacks. Hard to see how the demise of GM would have been worse, even with the more optimistic (higher) estimates of jobs that are directly or indirectly tied to Detroit. The best of GM would have survived in some form even if it had undergone a more radical form of bankruptcy. The best plants would have been bought by someone. All the workers would have been let go, the existing contracts voided, and workers could then have applied for their old jobs under a lower cost wage structure. Sort of like what happens when a public school gets reconstituted for poor performance. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: srs_49 (Jul 10, 2009 8:26 am) I think you also have to take into account the symbolic value of the total, sudden, shocking annihilation of General Motors and its affect upon the prestige and public attitudes of America as a whole. It would have been incredibly depressive...because if GM can disappear overnight, how about other giants? How about YOU?
|
|
|
Replying to: srs_49 (Jul 10, 2009 8:26 am) Thanks |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Jul 10, 2009 6:06 am) Don't selectively pick the one or two articles about Georgia when every other article on that page talks about how the rate for new unemployment claims went down. Now who is spinning. |
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jul 10, 2009 7:48 am) |
|
|
Replying to: srs_49 (Jul 10, 2009 8:26 am) Americans have been saving money and paying off debt like crazy now for over a year. Their debt has fallen from 13.9 Trillion to 13.8 Trillion. A hundred Billion dollar drop. Another 50 years and we can start spending again. The stimulus is spun by conservatives as not doing it's required job. It turns out to be a stealth wealth redistribution. Better that poor people get free health care than banks get bonus money? Both come at the future taxation on my children. Most of the news is meant to be a distraction.. M.J., C4C, bonuses. Cap and trade is wealth redist. also. An excuse to send poor people $400 apiece each year. So now we are getting worse but at a slower pace? Awesome job BO
|
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jul 10, 2009 8:39 am) I'm don't agree with your "symbolic value". GM's reputation has been on a downward decline for years. The prestige of America, if it is tied to any industry, is more tied to that of Boeing, Microsoft, and Intel than it ever will be to the D3/2. GM should have disappeared (maybe allowed to fade away is a better way to put it) years ago, way before it was able to accumulate $60+ billion in debt. That would have spread the pain out over years
|
|
|
Replying to: dave8697 (Jul 10, 2009 9:10 am) The worsening trend is improving. |
|
|
Replying to: windsurferk (Jul 10, 2009 5:20 am) As I read it this means that when you and your Dad go in to have the vehicle appraised the dealer has to tell you what the estimated scrap value is. YOU DO NOT GET ANY CREDIT FOR THIS SCRAP VALUE!! Most people are smart enough to have a good idea of what their trade is worth. If it's a 97 Explorer V8 with 150,000 on the clock it's scrap value is about $500. This is the number that has to be disclosed. The more common situation would be when somebody trades in a 2002 Explorer V8 and the vehicle is 'worth' $5000 at scrap. THIS is the situation why the dealer must disclose the trade in value. Taking the $4500 voucher for a $5000 vehicle isn't smart. No one should be encouraged to do so. Again you get no credit for the scrap value as I read it. If you want some of this 'scrap value' then take out the 'sellable' parts yourself before giving it to the dealer. This is perfectly above board as long as the vehicle is still legal to be driven on the road.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
Cash for Clunkers - Good or Bad Idea?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats