Sign In Join 



We thought we picked out an SUV....but we are having doubts

63 messages,  Last post on Aug 06, 2009 at 9:28 AM

You are in the SUVs Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Infiniti QX56, Toyota Sequoia, Lincoln Navigator, Ford Expedition, Car Buying, Car Comparisons, SUV


Messages Page 6 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#50 of 63
Re: We thought we picked out an SUV....but we are having doubts [warwickmon] by wvgasguy
Jan 30, 2009 (4:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: warwickmon (Jan 19, 2009 11:15 pm)

I traded in my 1999 4runner with 152K miles on it
 
I tried downsizing to a 4Runner when the kids left. However they would ride places with us often and since my son is 6'4" my wife would ride in the back. She has a bum knee so I ignored her complaints. Finally I got tired of hearing her gripe and I said you drive, I'll ride back there. It was aweful. No foot room, the seats were low and my knees were up high.
 
I also have a 4Runner for a company vehicle. I think it is head and shoulders the best mid size SUV out there. BUT if you have larger teen aged kids the 4Runner should be considerd child cruelity,
 
You'll love the Sequoia for the family as they grow.
 
I have found now though that the Highlander (I have the Hybrid) is also pretty spacious and has a great second row seat for 2 people. I'll get 23 to 26 mpg so over the years this will be a whole lot cheaper to operate and meets the needs of a smaller family
#51 of 63
Re: Sequoia vrs Expedition [wvgasguy] by hdfatboy
Jan 31, 2009 (4:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: wvgasguy (Jan 30, 2009 3:39 pm)

"One feature I really like with the Expedition is the fold flat rear seats. That may not mean as much if you always have the third row up. "
 
FYI, the seats fold flat in the Sequoia both the 2nd and 3rd rows. The 3rd row folds electrically in the Platinum and is an option on the Ltd.
#52 of 63
Re: Sequoia vrs Expedition [hdfatboy] by warwickmon
Feb 03, 2009 (2:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: hdfatboy (Jan 31, 2009 4:11 pm)

If you have a Platinum with captains chairs in the 2nd row, you have a sizable console in the center. But this too can be opened from back to front to lay flush with the the two folded down captains chairs. I bought a custom cover from Canvasback of Idaho that covers the console and protects the back from dog (St Bernard). If anybody is interested, I'll post a picture of it (cover, not dog).
#53 of 63
Re: Sequoia vrs Expedition [warwickmon] by mikey13170
Feb 03, 2009 (3:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: warwickmon (Feb 03, 2009 2:18 pm)

Would love to see your pic. I have a Ltd with Captains chairs and I added console. I have 3 boxers that I carry around and would have preferred to have had second row bench, but could not find one with the Nav and DVD + 20" wheels. Dealers just told me it wasn't possible to get it.
 
After having it 30 days so far I would have much preferred the bench.
#54 of 63
Fuel Computer readings by mikey13170
Feb 03, 2009 (3:20 pm)
Reply
I have had my Limited for about 30 days so far and I just noticed that the "range" reading had changed from when I first bought the truck.
 
I remember the first few fill ups showing that I could go roughly 380 miles on a full tank. Now when I fill up it says 285 miles on a full tank. That is only 10mpg......I commute to work about 25 miles each way and my trip computer says I'm averaging around 14.
Why does the range not match up with the avg fuel economy?
 
Has anyone else noticed this?
#55 of 63
Re: Fuel Computer readings [mikey13170] by hdfatboy
Feb 03, 2009 (5:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mikey13170 (Feb 03, 2009 3:20 pm)

"I remember the first few fill ups showing that I could go roughly 380 miles on a full tank. Now when I fill up it says 285 miles on a full tank. That is only 10mpg......I commute to work about 25 miles each way and my trip computer says I'm averaging around 14.
Why does the range not match up with the avg fuel economy?
  
Has anyone else noticed this? "

 
How are you measuring your range? One of the things you need to get used to is that the Sequoia shows E with 5-6 gallons still left in the tank. You probably have 80-100 miles still left in the tank when it reads Empty. Next time you fill up you'll see that it rarely takes much more than 20 gals when the guage first reads E.
 
Next time you fill up, subtract the amount of gals you buy from 26.4. Now take the difference and multiply the remaining gallons times the MPG on the trip computer...you just found your remaining fuel mileage range.
#56 of 63
Re: Fuel Computer readings [hdfatboy] by mikey13170
Feb 08, 2009 (8:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: hdfatboy (Feb 03, 2009 5:22 pm)

Yeah I had noticed the difference in filling the tank. Last night I filled up when it said I had 13 miles left to go. It took around 21.5 gallons to fill it meaning I had 5 gallons in reserve (roughly). If I'm getting 13.5 which has been the average, then I had another 65 miles to go on that tank. Add that 65 to my already 285 and I get 350, which is still off the original 385 the computer was telling me I'd get.
 
I guess it comes down to the computer re-calibrating itself based upon the driving style or average fuel economy.
 
Just wish I could get the posted 14 mpg it says I should get........not seeing it at all even driving conservatively.
#57 of 63
Re: Fuel Computer readings [mikey13170] by hdfatboy
Feb 09, 2009 (5:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mikey13170 (Feb 08, 2009 8:21 am)

I get 14 mpg now however for the first 10K miles it was under 13mpg. The fuel economy has gone up by 10% over time as the engine breaks in.
#58 of 63
Re: Fuel Computer readings [hdfatboy] by mikey13170
Feb 09, 2009 (7:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: hdfatboy (Feb 09, 2009 5:25 pm)

Interesting.....I'll have to watch that as time passes and see how it does.
#59 of 63
Re: Sequoia vrs Expedition [mikey13170] by warwickmon
Feb 10, 2009 (10:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: mikey13170 (Feb 03, 2009 3:16 pm)

Sorry it took me so long to get back. I haven't been here in a week. Here are the pics that were sent to me by the folks at canvasback. I wasn't sure from their description if their rear cover would fit right. They actually went to a dealer and installed the cover to take pictures for me. Nice service. So this is not actually my car. This one has the bench and I have the console like you. But all the pieces are separate so you can just omit the middle piece on the 2nd row. I have only installed the back piece and it works great. The velcro seals very tightly so no shifting around like a loose rug. I recommend it.
 
I put some pictures up on Carspace. Have a look.
 
Warwickmon

Messages Page 6 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement