Sign In Join 



Photo Radar

1788 messages,  Last post on Nov 14, 2009 at 3:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Safe Driving


Messages Page 7 of 179
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
179
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#61 of 1788
Re: Phoenix area photo radar stats [andys120] by larsb
Dec 30, 2008 (12:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andys120 (Dec 30, 2008 12:05 pm)

I'm not on a high horse. I live this way. I'm always working to make life for everyone around me better.
 
's How I Roll.
#62 of 1788
Re: Phoenix area photo radar stats [fintail] by larsb
Dec 30, 2008 (12:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Dec 30, 2008 12:09 pm)

I'm not blindly preaching "Speed Kills."
 
But it does. And it makes a bad wreck worse.
 
If people want to pay the piper, then they can speed on, brother.
 
Until they injure or kill someone I love ; at that point, their azz becomes mine.
#63 of 1788
Re: Phoenix area photo radar stats [larsb] by fintail
Dec 30, 2008 (12:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 30, 2008 12:40 pm)

That's really intimidating...I am sure the speeders out there are shaking in their boots
 
Some claim speed kills...but reality doesn't line up with that. Of course, wannabe authoritarians don't live in reality.
#64 of 1788
Re: Phoenix area photo radar stats [fintail] by larsb
Dec 30, 2008 (1:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Dec 30, 2008 12:57 pm)

Believe me, I'm not trying to intimidate anyone.
 
Just pointing out that unnecessary speeding kills young people and old people and average people and is a ridiculous and stupid cause of death.
 
Anyone who harms anyone else during an act of stupidity SHOULD be ready to face the family of the injured and take society's punishment. And if the courts don't deal out proper justice, then..................?
 
Speed does kill. The physics related to increased vehicle speed makes for more severe human tissue damage, and that directly causes death.
 
It's just common sense. Saying speed does not kill is just a cop-out from people who want to speed.
 
You don't believe me? Take a friend and the two of you get in an old car each without a seatbelt or airbag and drive into the same wall. You drive your car 60 mph and let your friend drive his car 20 mph into the wall.
 
See who comes out in better shape.
 
Speed doesn't kill....Puh-Leeze........
#65 of 1788
Re: Phoenix area photo radar stats [larsb] by fintail
Dec 30, 2008 (2:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 30, 2008 1:05 pm)

The inability to drive attentively and handle speed is what kills. Speed cameras address nothing but revenue shortfalls created by ineffectual public sector sucks, and the desire for money grabbing by scheming self-titled entrepreneurs with friends in the right places.
 
Saying speed kills is a simple cop out by those who can't handle driving that requires driver inputs.
 
The courts never dish out proper justice. Deal with it, you have no choice and no recourse. It's the American way.
 
If you want to drive at the same speed as a Model T driver, just keep your backwards turtle in the right lane, where you belong.
#66 of 1788
Re: Phoenix area photo radar stats [larsb] by oregonboy
Dec 30, 2008 (2:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 30, 2008 1:05 pm)

Actually, 20 mph into a solid wall in an old car with no seatbelt or airbag would probably be fatal.
#67 of 1788
Re: Phoenix area photo radar stats [fintail] by larsb
Dec 30, 2008 (2:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Dec 30, 2008 2:34 pm)

I'm sorry that you think the roads ought to be NASCAR-sanctioned and that only "good" drivers can drive fast safely.
 
I'll believe that COMPLETELY after NASCAR has their first season with ZERO wrecks.
 
After all, they are PROS who are obviously driving attentively and know how to handle speeds. Agreed?
 
No matter how "good" drivers become and/or already are, accidents at 75 MPH are more severe and deadly (as a general rule) than the same accident at 55 MPH.
 
I drive on "speed-camera-guarded" freeways here in the Phoenix area, and myself and others have noticed how much nicer it is to drive when you are not getting passed by QUITE as many jerks going 85 in the 65 zone.
 
This is one of the famous "Autobahn" wreck pictures. You think this would have happened at 55 mph?
 
#68 of 1788
Re: Phoenix area photo radar stats [oregonboy] by larsb
Dec 30, 2008 (2:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: oregonboy (Dec 30, 2008 2:36 pm)

You could very well be correct on that.
 
I hope you got my point, though.
#69 of 1788
Re: Phoenix area photo radar stats [larsb] by fintail
Dec 30, 2008 (2:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 30, 2008 2:42 pm)

NASCAR is irrelevant, a weak red herring. Kind of like Phoenix itself...
 
If you are all about reducing the severity of accidents, then you have no problem supporting speeds where casualties would almost vanish, right? Why stop with a reduction, if safety is the true reason for the embrace of blind authoritarian idiocy that exists in reality to generate money for the least accountable segments of society? 40 or even 35 or 30 would be fine to you, right?
 
Such crashes as the cheap emotional image you post happen no matter the road or the speed limit.
#70 of 1788
Re: Phoenix area photo radar stats [larsb] by berri
Dec 30, 2008 (6:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 30, 2008 2:43 pm)

If you're driving under the limit, or going the limit in the left lane, you are probably backing up traffic and agitating everyone. That's less safe than going 10 over the limit and keeping to the right. People going way under the limit, or hogging the passing lane, are bigger accident causers than those going 10 over the limit provided there is no traffic backup or congestion. Ideally, everyone would just drive the posted limit, then traffic would flow better and there would be fewer accidents. The government gets a lot of the blame. They post artifically low speed limits and allow minimum speeds way below the posted limit on expressways. This is where the congestion problem gets started in the first place, so its a little outrageous that they use cameras to nail speeders, but let the people backing up traffic flow get no penalties. Add to that the likelihood of payola or other disingenious methods of rigging the equipment and paying commisions (kickbacks) to the camera companies and you can see why people get upset. I don't trust this "contracting out" the cameras because a day doesn't seem to go by when you don't see another news story about government and/or business corruption. If there are cameras, there needs to be an independent 3rd party like UL verifying they are properly calibrated on a random basis.

Messages Page 7 of 179
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
179
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement