Sign In Join 



Photo Radar

1788 messages,  Last post on Nov 14, 2009 at 3:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Safe Driving


Messages Page 5 of 179
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
179
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#41 of 1788
Re: The Politics of Cameras [larsb] by andys120
Dec 29, 2008 (2:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 29, 2008 1:27 pm)

It's obvious that you have no concept of the basis on which legal proceedings are conducted in the US of A.
#42 of 1788
Re: The Politics of Cameras [andys120] by berri
Dec 29, 2008 (2:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andys120 (Dec 29, 2008 2:11 pm)

The judge will seldom let you off because they are part of the whole revenue game. After all, those revenues also pay the judge's salary! I seriously doubt the devices aren't rigged since they have to give a cut to the camera company. We've seen how rampant corruption is in both governemnt and business these past few months.
#43 of 1788
That's not it either..... by andys120
Dec 29, 2008 (3:20 pm)
Reply
I know from personal experience that the system is not as rigged or corrupt as you say. I have contested traffic citations at least a dozen times in numerous jurisdictions, I have been able to get a reduced fine or dismissal 50% of the time.
 
If everyone were to do what I do and contest every summons, the sytstem would quickly collapse from over load.
#44 of 1788
Re: The Politics of Cameras [andys120] by larsb
Dec 30, 2008 (6:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: andys120 (Dec 29, 2008 2:11 pm)

Well, you are right in that I don't have PERSONAL experience. I have never stood up before a judge in real life.
 
But I do know about debating and arguing - THOSE I am good at.
 
And I have friends who have gotten photo radar tickets. They ARE ALLOWED to contest the ticket in court before a judge and have their say.
 
That is no different in process than contesting a ticket issued by a human, except that you have one less person to argue with.
#45 of 1788
Phoenix area photo radar stats by larsb
Dec 30, 2008 (6:36 am)
Reply
The latest Phoenix-area photo radar stats were announced.
 
Injury accidents - down 17%
Fatalities - down 29%
 
In the first 80 days of the program, about 7 fewer people died than usual.
 
Photo radar CAN save lives and DOES reduce speeds.
#46 of 1788
Re: The Politics of Cameras [larsb] by oldfarmer50
Dec 30, 2008 (8:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 30, 2008 6:34 am)

"...But I do know about debating and arguing..."
 
At last, something we agree on. Have a happy new year.
#47 of 1788
Re: Phoenix area photo radar stats [larsb] by fintail
Dec 30, 2008 (8:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 30, 2008 6:36 am)

Where is the proof of causation?
#48 of 1788
Re: The Politics of Cameras [oldfarmer50] by euphonium
Dec 30, 2008 (9:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Dec 29, 2008 10:30 am)

and what was its reply when you confronted the parking meter?
#49 of 1788
Re: Phoenix area photo radar stats [fintail] by larsb
Dec 30, 2008 (9:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Dec 30, 2008 8:53 am)

fintail says, "Where is the proof of causation?"
 
Common Sense-ation.
#50 of 1788
Re: Phoenix area photo radar stats [larsb] by fintail
Dec 30, 2008 (10:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 30, 2008 9:35 am)

So in other words, nothing. Thanks
 
Such cameras have widely been defined as ineffective in England - the state that invented the Orwellian surveillance grid and has more of these cameras than anywhere else. But maybe results are different in the land of logic and reason known as Arizona.

Messages Page 5 of 179
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
179
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement