Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views Photo Radar
1787 messages, Last post on Nov 06, 2009 at 9:07 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: larsb (Jan 08, 2009 6:31 am) If exceeding the speed limit on a limited access highways were dangerous, you'd have a point, but since it isn't, you don't. larsb: That's right - I'm reminding you that we all should want people to drive slower, waste less fuel, and reduce road rage incidents. And, I'm reminding you again that not everyone wants to drive "slower;" driving at higher speeds is not a waste of fuel for most people (otherwise they wouldn't do it); and there is no proof that driving slower reduces road rage. If you really want to reduce road rage, I'd suggest that you stop driving 55 mph when every one else is driving 75 mph...  larsb: And in Phoenix, cameras are not a "hidden tax increase." They are a speeders tax, just as tobacco taxes are paid by tobacco users, gasoline taxes are paid by gasoline users, and homeowners taxes are paid by homeowners. If you set speed limits too low, and then use automated technology to raise revenue from said drivers, this is a hidden tax increase. larsb: If you don't want to pay the "speeders tax" then don't drive 11+ MPH over the speed limit. If you DO want to drive that fast, then you can pay the "tax" for it. No, the solution is to set speed limits at realistic levels, and ignore those who think that driving 80 mph on a limited access highway is somehow dangerous, and should therefore be "taxed."
|
|
|
grbeck says, "If exceeding the speed limit on a limited access highways were dangerous" That's a completely unreasonable stance.
|
|
|
Replying to: grbeck (Jan 08, 2009 8:54 am) Regardless if you "want to drive slower" that's the frickin LAW and you should not disobey it. Driving at 75 versus 65 wastes fuel in EVERY SITUATION.
|
|
|
grbeck says, "If you set speed limits too low, and then use automated technology to raise revenue from said drivers, this is a hidden tax increase. " It's not HIDDEN !!!! There are warning signs "Photo radar enforcement zone" !!!!! A trooper in a secluded location with a radar gun, now THAT's hidden !!!
|
|
|
grbeck says, "No, the solution is to set speed limits at realistic levels, and ignore those who think that driving 80 mph on a limited access highway is somehow dangerous, and should therefore be "taxed."" What are you, some kind of speed freak? You are acting as if 100 years of automobile usage has taught us that SPEED DOES NOT KILL when it's in reality just the opposite !!!
|
|
|
Replying to: andys120 (Dec 16, 2008 10:54 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: xrunner2 (Jan 08, 2009 9:27 am) Amen Bro !! |
|
|
Replying to: larsb (Jan 08, 2009 8:58 am) And yet even the "research" you linked to supports it. I would suggest that you take the time to check the latest figures for fatalities per 100 million miles driven in the U.S. Given that it is at a record low, and that people are driving faster than ever on limited access highways, the facts suggest that exceeding the speed limit on limited access highways is not dangerous, and traffic safety efforts are better aimed elsewhere. |
|
|
Replying to: larsb (Jan 08, 2009 9:00 am) Prohibition and the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 were the law, too. You'll have to come up with a better argument than that one to convince more sophisticated, better informed drivers of your position. You aren't going to convince anyone who has actually thought about this issue beyond the "speeding is bad, duh!" mentality. larsb: Driving at 75 versus 65 wastes fuel in EVERY SITUATION. Nonsense. I waste fuel if I pour it on the ground after buying it. If I've decided that I'd rather enjoy the safety, convenience and pleasure that come with driving faster on a limited access highway, that is not "wasting" fuel. That's called deciding that it's worth it to use the extra fuel to go faster. If you want to boost your credibility in this discussion, I'd suggest you start by learning the difference between your opinion and fact. Here's lesson one - it's your opinion that driving faster always wastes fuel. Not everyone shares this opinion, and it doesn't make them wrong. |
|
|
Replying to: larsb (Jan 08, 2009 9:01 am) A trooper in a secluded location with a radar gun, now THAT's hidden !!! I said that the tax increase would be hidden, NOT the photo radar. Reading comprehension can be your friend...
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views Photo Radar
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
