Sign In Join 



Photo Radar

1788 messages,  Last post on Nov 14, 2009 at 3:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Safe Driving


Messages Page 2 of 179
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
179
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#11 of 1788
Re: Photo Radar [andys120] by carnaught
Dec 16, 2008 (4:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andys120 (Dec 16, 2008 10:54 am)

-Fines are levied only on the registered owner of the vehicle, no license points are accrued and insurance companies are not notified.
 
My buddy tells me that if it is 85mph or over in Az., it is a criminal vehicular offense and therefore license points are levied.
#12 of 1788
Re: Photo Radar [carnaught] by berri
Dec 16, 2008 (4:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: carnaught (Dec 16, 2008 4:43 pm)

Let's see, the photo company gets a rake each time a ticket is issued - tell me these cameras aren't rigged with a short yellow light, or a few extra mph to increase the photo company commisions. If a city uses the cameras, the city should run them and there should be no cut to the photo company to insure it is honest. Face it, how frequently do you read about crooked business deals any more.
#13 of 1788
New NHSA Report... by andys120
Dec 17, 2008 (8:25 am)
Reply
..We've all heard the phrase 'speed kills', and it's been widely applied to situations both apt and not. A recent study conducted by the NHTSA examining over 5,400 crashes across a nearly three-year period presents some evidence that excessive speed, while it may cause more serious injuries, is not a leading cause of accidents.
 
Adopting a simplified linear model of an accident's timeline, the most frequent 'critical pre-crash event' cause is driver inattention. The 'critical pre-crash event' is defined as the action or event that puts the vehicle on an inevitable collision course - the point of no return.

 
Got that, driver inattention, not speed causes most accidents.
#14 of 1788
Re: New NHSA Report... [andys120] by larsb
Dec 17, 2008 (8:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: andys120 (Dec 17, 2008 8:25 am)

Higher speed crashes due to driver inattention are more serious, dangerous, and costly to insurance companies than lower-speed crashes.
 
Slowing down is good for EVERYONE.
 
Except the states trying to drum up income from the speed cameras.
#15 of 1788
Re: New NHSA Report... [larsb] by fintail
Dec 17, 2008 (8:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Dec 17, 2008 8:36 am)

So then we should all go no more than 40 or so
#16 of 1788
Re: New NHSA Report... [fintail] by larsb
Dec 17, 2008 (9:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Dec 17, 2008 8:46 am)

I will if you will...............
#17 of 1788
new game in town by steve_ HOST
Dec 22, 2008 (11:22 pm)
Reply
"A speed camera is located out in front of Wootton High School, providing a convenient location for generating the false tickets. Instead of purchasing license plates, students have ready access to laser printers that can create duplicate license plates using glossy paper using readily available fonts. For example, the state name of "Maryland" appears on plates in a font similar to Garamond Number 5 Swash Italic. Once the camera flashes, the driver can quickly pull over and remove the fake paper plate. The victim will receive a $40 ticket in the mail weeks later."
 
Maryland Students Use Speed Cameras for Revenge (theNewspaper.com)
#18 of 1788
Re: new game in town [steve_] by dtownfb
Dec 23, 2008 (8:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Dec 22, 2008 11:22 pm)

What ever happened to police actually patrolling the roads???? One well placed police officer can slow traffic down very easily.
#19 of 1788
Re: new game in town [dtownfb] by fintail
Dec 23, 2008 (9:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: dtownfb (Dec 23, 2008 8:35 am)

One well placed surplus car with a mannequin behind the wheel can slow traffic too.
 
Just more to show these cameras are for moneymaking - for desperate municipalities and well-connected crony capitalist camera operators.
#20 of 1788
Santa has his say on Photo Radar> by andys120
Dec 24, 2008 (9:03 am)
Reply
link
 
I've stated before that I do not go along with destroying enforcement cameras but this strikes me as a creative, amusing and relatively harmless method of civil disobedience.
 
Tempe Police are investigating, may prosecute.
 
Tempe is the home of Arizona State University, and residents are no doubt used to student hi-jinks. Investigating and prosecuting this prank will cost the taxpayers much more than simply removing the boxes.

Messages Page 2 of 179
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
179
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement