Sign In Join 



2010 Ford Taurus

275 messages,  Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 12:07 PM

You are in the Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Taurus, Automotive News, Future Vehicle, Sedan


Messages Page 7 of 28
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
28
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#57 of 275
Re: 2010 Tarus vs 2010 Lacrosse [bruneau1] by jlc
Sep 12, 2009 (9:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: bruneau1 (Sep 11, 2009 9:12 am)

It had the 235/55's. But the sales gal said they just got the car. Makes me wonder if anybody check the tire presures? Thanks for the infoe.
#58 of 275
Re: weight and SHO [mevander1] by jlc
Sep 12, 2009 (9:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: mevander1 (Sep 12, 2009 12:24 am)

I agree with you on the pricing for the SHO and non SHO, BUT I think you maybe able to deal or, it will defienetly put it out of reach for a lot of folks and up against a lot of imports.
#59 of 275
Taurus Pricing by thegraduate
Sep 12, 2009 (1:53 pm)
Reply
A Taurus SEL with optional Leather, Sync (Single CD, but with USB who needs it? ), 263hp and 18" Aluminum Wheels lists for $30,090, including Destination Charges.
 
The most similar-in-price Avalon, what seems to be the benchmark here, that I could find on Toyota's site is an Avalon XL, cloth interior, 6CD, 16" Alloys. I'm in a 35--- zip code.
 
 MSRP
Base $27,945
Options $1,139
Manuf, Delv, Proc & Hndlg $775
Subtotal $29,859
Dealer Fees $416
Total $30,275
 
Plus, you have to be seen driving the thing. The Avalon arguably has the better powertrain, but the Taurus has it all over the Avalon with style. Does the average driver of these two particular vehicles care which is quicker to 60 and gets better mileage (even though that is so close its anybody's game to me), or which looks better? Feel free to answer!
 
Sorry, the pictures of the Avalon XL with the 16" wheels were tough to come by. These are the more expensive model's wheels.

#60 of 275
Re: Taurus Pricing [thegraduate] by mikemartin
Sep 13, 2009 (10:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Sep 12, 2009 1:53 pm)

I agree with you that the Avalon has a superior powertrain (especially motor) to the Taurus. I'd also argue that the Avalon has a superior ride, having driven both, and better fit and finish on the dash and other interior trim.
 
Not only that, but the Hyundai Genesis, which has a base model option list that is way better than that of the Taurus, is a superior offering to the Taurus.
 
If Ford thinks exterior sheet metal styling alone is going to trump quality and true refinement of the competitors, I think they've underestimated the intelligence of buyers in this segment.
 
Also, the last gen Taurus actually has more interior room, a better ride, IMO, and the same motor and other important 'parts' as the "new" Taurus (both derived from the Volvo D3 platform) and is about 50% the price for a 18 month old, gently used one.
#61 of 275
Re: weight and SHO [kernick] by no_bias
Sep 21, 2009 (4:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: kernick (May 06, 2009 11:47 am)

Kernick, what type of car do you drive? Why is 40k such a huge price tag to you? Have you actually taken an in person look at the SHO? I have. The Taurus is no longer "your grandmothers car." It's a real head turner. I usually research my next vehicle 3 to 6 months ahead of buying. I have driven this car. It was nicely put together. It has everything that I could want, except a heated steering wheel ( really cold, bad winters here). While researching vehicles with certain equipment the SHO easily filled the wish list. Nothing came close to filling the list at this price tag. If you have any bargaining skills to add to rebates, incentives, A-plan, etc., the vehicle drops below this price (up to 7,000). Most of the post I've read that down grade the SHO in comparison to other vehicles (mostly the foreign cars) don't consider what your getting dollar for dollar. Most of the foreign cars at the same price that out perform the SHO (in certain categories, NOT ALL) are stripped down. Start adding equipment and you will find that the price and weight goes up. This car does great in every category (interior quietness, space, comfort, style, speed, equipment, and price). Most cars lose that oomph after 80 mph. NOT THE SHO. I have driven this car at 70 mph, punched the gas and got to 120 mph in just a few seconds, before having to slow down due to traffic. I have no idea what the top speed of this car is. Always too much traffic during test drive times to find out. This year Ford has a vehicle in every category, to suit anyones taste or needs; I must say that each vehicle is also pretty sharp. I think you need to make a list of things you want in a car, and then go drive them. I think you will change your mind. I have tested a lot of cars, and the only car that came close to the SHO in most of the categories in the SAME price range was the Buick LaCrosse. But, you HAVE TO take the smaller, less powerful, engine (255 hp) to get AWD. Extremely disappointing in performance. I keep my options open down to the time of signing. If you know of a better vehicle in all those categories in the SAME price range please let me know. I would love to check it out.
#62 of 275
Re: weight and SHO [no_bias] by mikemartin
Sep 21, 2009 (10:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: no_bias (Sep 21, 2009 4:33 am)

"why is 40k such a huge price tag to you?"
 
LOL!!!
 
What universe do you live in where a bread and butter family sedan is anything but expensive at 40k?
 
The 2010, completely redesigned Mercedes E-Class 350 can be had for 47k nicely equipped, and it's an outstanding car recalling MB solidity of the 80s, and there are plenty of cars as large and comfy as the Taurus for the low 20s.
#63 of 275
Re: weight and SHO [mikemartin] by akirby
Sep 22, 2009 (4:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: mikemartin (Sep 21, 2009 10:39 pm)

The E350 only has 268 hp - why are you comparing it to a 365 hp Taurus SHO? The 263 HP Taurus starts at $27K and is still at least $10K cheaper than the E350 nicely equipped.
 
For a true comparison you need to select the E550 4matic (AWD) and 382 hp. It STARTS at $60K.
 
And I wouldn't be surprised if the Taurus was bigger than the E class to boot.
 
Try comparing apples to apples next time.
#64 of 275
taurus reception. by pod
Sep 22, 2009 (8:15 am)
Reply
This is an enthusiasts magazine and the audience may be quite different than the standard car buyer. The nonSHO tauruses are pretty much a known item, carrying over most of the 2009 basics. The SHO is a totally new breed. I wonder how many people will hold back the first year to see the track record (resale value wise and repair wise) especially given the economy. The old saw about not buying a car in its first year of existence might see a slow start and then a gradual acceptance as the performance and reliability data come in. Granted it will take more than a year to set resale values. Hopefully there will be a significant change in the way tauruses have depreciated in the past. On the other hand, enthusiasts are willing to take the gamble given the very newness of this new powerful machine.
#65 of 275
Re: weight and SHO [akirby] by dodgeman07
Sep 22, 2009 (11:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Sep 22, 2009 4:48 am)

NASCAR Mike was making light of the fact that $40K is a lot of money for most American sedan buyers. The comparison was not a direct one.
 
Ford has a winner with the new Taurus but it is priced too high. Most nicely equipped offerings are $32K-$33K or about 10% above where they should be.
 
We all know that someone who plunks down $32K today for a well equipped SEL will have a $22K car 6 months from now. The Asian and European makes will depreciate half that much in the same timeframe.
 
I may be interested in a $19K 2010 Taurus with 10,000 miles on it next fall though.
  They'll be plenty around for under $20K soon.
#66 of 275
Re: weight and SHO [dodgeman07] by akirby
Sep 23, 2009 (5:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: dodgeman07 (Sep 22, 2009 11:03 pm)

The new Taurus is a desirable car that's not being overproduced and isn't being dumped into rental fleets. You can't predict depreciation based on past vehicles.
 
People who say the new Taurus is overpriced simply have no idea how much a new car costs or what the competition offers. The new Taurus isn't a bargain, but go compare it to imports of similar SIZE and features - it's priced competitively.

Messages Page 7 of 28
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
28
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement