- #53 of 258
-
Is the 2010 Taurus in showrooms yet?
by ronsmith38
-
Jun 17, 2009 (5:33 am)
-
|
|
I see the 2009 Taurus is no longer listed in the car lineup on the Ford Cars home page.
|
- #54 of 258
-
2010 Tarus vs 2010 Lacrosse
by jlc
-
Sep 11, 2009 (7:27 am)
-
|
I am looking at both cars but can't make up my mind. I have driven both. I thought the Traus SEL had a firmer ride and more tire noise? The buick was an CX. I was impressed with the interior of both, but the Lacrosse seemed to have a roomier feel. Any other feed back would be appreciated.
Thanks
JLC41
|
- #55 of 258
-
Re: 2010 Tarus vs 2010 Lacrosse [jlc]
by bruneau1
-
Sep 11, 2009 (9:12 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: jlc (Sep 11, 2009 7:27 am)
What tires were on the Taurus? The standard 235/55/18 or the optional 255/45/19.? The latter are stiffer and noisier. We have ordered a SEL with the standard tires. Drove a Limited with the 19" and found the ride too thumpy.
|
- #56 of 258
-
Re: weight and SHO [brucelinc]
by mevander1
-
Sep 12, 2009 (12:24 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: brucelinc (May 06, 2009 11:08 am)
The pricing on the SHO is too high in my opinion, as well as a decently equiped non SHO model. Ford had the chance for a home run here. The Taurus will depreciate vs top German models of smaller size.
|
- #57 of 258
-
Re: 2010 Tarus vs 2010 Lacrosse [bruneau1]
by jlc
-
Sep 12, 2009 (9:13 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: bruneau1 (Sep 11, 2009 9:12 am)
It had the 235/55's. But the sales gal said they just got the car. Makes me wonder if anybody check the tire presures? Thanks for the infoe.
|
- #58 of 258
-
Re: weight and SHO [mevander1]
by jlc
-
Sep 12, 2009 (9:18 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: mevander1 (Sep 12, 2009 12:24 am)
I agree with you on the pricing for the SHO and non SHO, BUT I think you maybe able to deal or, it will defienetly put it out of reach for a lot of folks and up against a lot of imports.
|
- #59 of 258
-
Taurus Pricing
by thegraduate
-
Sep 12, 2009 (1:53 pm)
-
|
A Taurus SEL with optional Leather, Sync (Single CD, but with USB who needs it?  ), 263hp and 18" Aluminum Wheels lists for $30,090, including Destination Charges.
The most similar-in-price Avalon, what seems to be the benchmark here, that I could find on Toyota's site is an Avalon XL, cloth interior, 6CD, 16" Alloys. I'm in a 35--- zip code.
MSRP
Base $27,945
Options $1,139
Manuf, Delv, Proc & Hndlg $775
Subtotal $29,859
Dealer Fees $416
Total $30,275
Plus, you have to be seen driving the thing. The Avalon arguably has the better powertrain, but the Taurus has it all over the Avalon with style. Does the average driver of these two particular vehicles care which is quicker to 60 and gets better mileage (even though that is so close its anybody's game to me), or which looks better? Feel free to answer!
Sorry, the pictures of the Avalon XL with the 16" wheels were tough to come by. These are the more expensive model's wheels.
|
- #60 of 258
-
Re: Taurus Pricing [thegraduate]
by mikemartin
-
Sep 13, 2009 (10:00 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Sep 12, 2009 1:53 pm)
I agree with you that the Avalon has a superior powertrain (especially motor) to the Taurus. I'd also argue that the Avalon has a superior ride, having driven both, and better fit and finish on the dash and other interior trim.
Not only that, but the Hyundai Genesis, which has a base model option list that is way better than that of the Taurus, is a superior offering to the Taurus.
If Ford thinks exterior sheet metal styling alone is going to trump quality and true refinement of the competitors, I think they've underestimated the intelligence of buyers in this segment.
Also, the last gen Taurus actually has more interior room, a better ride, IMO, and the same motor and other important 'parts' as the "new" Taurus (both derived from the Volvo D3 platform) and is about 50% the price for a 18 month old, gently used one.
|
- #61 of 258
-
Re: weight and SHO [kernick]
by no_bias
-
Sep 21, 2009 (4:33 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: kernick (May 06, 2009 11:47 am)
Kernick, what type of car do you drive? Why is 40k such a huge price tag to you? Have you actually taken an in person look at the SHO? I have. The Taurus is no longer "your grandmothers car." It's a real head turner. I usually research my next vehicle 3 to 6 months ahead of buying. I have driven this car. It was nicely put together. It has everything that I could want, except a heated steering wheel ( really cold, bad winters here). While researching vehicles with certain equipment the SHO easily filled the wish list. Nothing came close to filling the list at this price tag. If you have any bargaining skills to add to rebates, incentives, A-plan, etc., the vehicle drops below this price (up to 7,000). Most of the post I've read that down grade the SHO in comparison to other vehicles (mostly the foreign cars) don't consider what your getting dollar for dollar. Most of the foreign cars at the same price that out perform the SHO (in certain categories, NOT ALL) are stripped down. Start adding equipment and you will find that the price and weight goes up. This car does great in every category (interior quietness, space, comfort, style, speed, equipment, and price). Most cars lose that oomph after 80 mph. NOT THE SHO. I have driven this car at 70 mph, punched the gas and got to 120 mph in just a few seconds, before having to slow down due to traffic. I have no idea what the top speed of this car is. Always too much traffic during test drive times to find out. This year Ford has a vehicle in every category, to suit anyones taste or needs; I must say that each vehicle is also pretty sharp. I think you need to make a list of things you want in a car, and then go drive them. I think you will change your mind. I have tested a lot of cars, and the only car that came close to the SHO in most of the categories in the SAME price range was the Buick LaCrosse. But, you HAVE TO take the smaller, less powerful, engine (255 hp) to get AWD. Extremely disappointing in performance. I keep my options open down to the time of signing. If you know of a better vehicle in all those categories in the SAME price range please let me know. I would love to check it out.
|
- #62 of 258
-
Re: weight and SHO [no_bias]
by mikemartin
-
Sep 21, 2009 (10:39 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: no_bias (Sep 21, 2009 4:33 am)
"why is 40k such a huge price tag to you?"
LOL!!!
What universe do you live in where a bread and butter family sedan is anything but expensive at 40k?
The 2010, completely redesigned Mercedes E-Class 350 can be had for 47k nicely equipped, and it's an outstanding car recalling MB solidity of the 80s, and there are plenty of cars as large and comfy as the Taurus for the low 20s.
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans 
