You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable
2010 Ford Taurus

256 messages, Last post on Nov 08, 2009 at 5:29 PM
You are in the Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: pod (May 06, 2009 9:34 am) You'd do better to compare to vehicles such as the 300C. Similarly equipped with AWD and the big 5.7, the Chrysler weighs in at 4,280 lbs. |
|
|
Replying to: akirby (May 06, 2009 12:40 pm) |
|
|
|
| I see the 2009 Taurus is no longer listed in the car lineup on the Ford Cars home page. | |
|
I am looking at both cars but can't make up my mind. I have driven both. I thought the Traus SEL had a firmer ride and more tire noise? The buick was an CX. I was impressed with the interior of both, but the Lacrosse seemed to have a roomier feel. Any other feed back would be appreciated. Thanks JLC41
|
|
|
Replying to: jlc (Sep 11, 2009 7:27 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: brucelinc (May 06, 2009 11:08 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: bruneau1 (Sep 11, 2009 9:12 am) |
|
|
Replying to: mevander1 (Sep 12, 2009 12:24 am) |
|
|
|
|
A Taurus SEL with optional Leather, Sync (Single CD, but with USB who needs it? The most similar-in-price Avalon, what seems to be the benchmark here, that I could find on Toyota's site is an Avalon XL, cloth interior, 6CD, 16" Alloys. I'm in a 35--- zip code. MSRP Base $27,945 Options $1,139 Manuf, Delv, Proc & Hndlg $775 Subtotal $29,859 Dealer Fees $416 Total $30,275 Plus, you have to be seen driving the thing. The Avalon arguably has the better powertrain, but the Taurus has it all over the Avalon with style. Does the average driver of these two particular vehicles care which is quicker to 60 and gets better mileage (even though that is so close its anybody's game to me), or which looks better? Feel free to answer! Sorry, the pictures of the Avalon XL with the 16" wheels were tough to come by. These are the more expensive model's wheels.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Sep 12, 2009 1:53 pm) Not only that, but the Hyundai Genesis, which has a base model option list that is way better than that of the Taurus, is a superior offering to the Taurus. If Ford thinks exterior sheet metal styling alone is going to trump quality and true refinement of the competitors, I think they've underestimated the intelligence of buyers in this segment. Also, the last gen Taurus actually has more interior room, a better ride, IMO, and the same motor and other important 'parts' as the "new" Taurus (both derived from the Volvo D3 platform) and is about 50% the price for a 18 month old, gently used one. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable
2010 Ford Taurus
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Ford Taurus



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats