You are here: Forums Sedans Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable 2010 Ford Taurus

2010 Ford Taurus

275 messages,  Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 12:07 PM

You are in the Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Taurus, Automotive News, Future Vehicle, Sedan

Messages Page 6 of 28 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 28 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#50 of 275 Re: weight and SHO [kernick] by akirby May 06, 2009 (12:40 pm)
Replying to: kernick (May 06, 2009 11:47 am) So the typical SHO will be over $40K? That's a lot of money for a Ford,   It's also a lot more car than any previous Ford sedan - way more. Show me a full size sedan with the same features and power and I guarantee it will cost at least that much and probably way more. An Audi A6 Quattro starts at $62K (and it's smaller).   A fully optioned Accord or Camry goes for $32K (with a lot less power and without AWD). Perhaps you haven't looked at new car prices in a while? Replies to this message: kirby2010 (May 27, 2009 4:39 pm)
#51 of 275 Re: weight and SHO [pod] by thegraduate May 06, 2009 (7:03 pm)
Replying to: pod (May 06, 2009 9:34 am) Let's stop comparing to Accord here (although I'd welcome a comparison forum if someone else would like, I'd be happy to set it up, just let me know. The Sonata is more of a full-size car than the Accord (the latter of which is only full-size when not equipped with a moonroof, which all V6 models are).   You'd do better to compare to vehicles such as the 300C. Similarly equipped with AWD and the big 5.7, the Chrysler weighs in at 4,280 lbs.
#52 of 275 Re: weight and SHO [akirby] by kirby2010 May 27, 2009 (4:39 pm)
Replying to: akirby (May 06, 2009 12:40 pm) Excellent comment. In fact I bought a new '94 SHO and sold it in 2001 with 108,000 miles. I bought a new 2001 A-6 2.7T w/6-speed. If I could have bought another 1994 SHO at the time I would have been all over it. I paid $46K for the Audi and I still drive it. 103K miles, no door dings, no rust, serviced every 5K miles at the dealer and hardly anyone ever rides in the back seat. I did take it to the Audi dealer last year to talk trade but I can't see paying $62K to replace this car. In 1994 I paid about $27K for my SHO. $40K-$42K for a 2009 is right in line with what I would expect to pay. There may be some discounting. But if this model is anywhere close to the 1994 this will be a great value. (Interestingly I did a lot of thinking in 2001 becuase the Acura TL was almost exactly the same dimensions as the A-6 and $10K less. But the Acura then was far short of the Audi I bought and the SHO I sold.)
#53 of 275 Is the 2010 Taurus in showrooms yet? by ronsmith38 Jun 17, 2009 (5:33 am)
I see the 2009 Taurus is no longer listed in the car lineup on the Ford Cars home page.
#54 of 275 2010 Tarus vs 2010 Lacrosse by jlc Sep 11, 2009 (7:27 am)
I am looking at both cars but can't make up my mind. I have driven both. I thought the Traus SEL had a firmer ride and more tire noise? The buick was an CX. I was impressed with the interior of both, but the Lacrosse seemed to have a roomier feel. Any other feed back would be appreciated. Thanks JLC41 Replies to this message: bruneau1 (Sep 11, 2009 9:12 am) jlc (Sep 12, 2009 9:13 am)
#55 of 275 Re: 2010 Tarus vs 2010 Lacrosse [jlc] by bruneau1 Sep 11, 2009 (9:12 am)
Replying to: jlc (Sep 11, 2009 7:27 am) What tires were on the Taurus? The standard 235/55/18 or the optional 255/45/19.? The latter are stiffer and noisier. We have ordered a SEL with the standard tires. Drove a Limited with the 19" and found the ride too thumpy. Replies to this message: jlc (Sep 12, 2009 9:13 am)
#56 of 275 Re: weight and SHO [brucelinc] by mevander1 Sep 12, 2009 (12:24 am)
Replying to: brucelinc (May 06, 2009 11:08 am) The pricing on the SHO is too high in my opinion, as well as a decently equiped non SHO model. Ford had the chance for a home run here. The Taurus will depreciate vs top German models of smaller size. Replies to this message: jlc (Sep 12, 2009 9:18 am)
#57 of 275 Re: 2010 Tarus vs 2010 Lacrosse [bruneau1] by jlc Sep 12, 2009 (9:13 am)
Replying to: bruneau1 (Sep 11, 2009 9:12 am) It had the 235/55's. But the sales gal said they just got the car. Makes me wonder if anybody check the tire presures? Thanks for the infoe.
#58 of 275 Re: weight and SHO [mevander1] by jlc Sep 12, 2009 (9:18 am)
Replying to: mevander1 (Sep 12, 2009 12:24 am) I agree with you on the pricing for the SHO and non SHO, BUT I think you maybe able to deal or, it will defienetly put it out of reach for a lot of folks and up against a lot of imports.
#59 of 275 Taurus Pricing by thegraduate Sep 12, 2009 (1:53 pm)
A Taurus SEL with optional Leather, Sync (Single CD, but with USB who needs it? ), 263hp and 18" Aluminum Wheels lists for $30,090, including Destination Charges.   The most similar-in-price Avalon, what seems to be the benchmark here, that I could find on Toyota's site is an Avalon XL, cloth interior, 6CD, 16" Alloys. I'm in a 35--- zip code.    MSRP Base $27,945 Options $1,139 Manuf, Delv, Proc & Hndlg $775 Subtotal $29,859 Dealer Fees $416 Total $30,275   Plus, you have to be seen driving the thing. The Avalon arguably has the better powertrain, but the Taurus has it all over the Avalon with style. Does the average driver of these two particular vehicles care which is quicker to 60 and gets better mileage (even though that is so close its anybody's game to me), or which looks better? Feel free to answer!   Sorry, the pictures of the Avalon XL with the 16" wheels were tough to come by. These are the more expensive model's wheels. Replies to this message: mikemartin (Sep 13, 2009 10:00 pm)

Messages Page 6 of 28 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 28 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Sedans Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable 2010 Ford Taurus