Sign In Join 



2010 Ford Taurus

261 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 10:05 AM

You are in the Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Taurus, Automotive News, Future Vehicle, Sedan


Messages Page 27 of 27
1
...
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#254 of 261
Re: Taurus and Lincoln MKS [berri] by thegraduate
Nov 07, 2009 (6:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: berri (Nov 07, 2009 2:07 pm)

Not recommended doesn't mean unreliable. What was the reliability rating?
#255 of 261
Re: Taurus and Lincoln MKS [thegraduate] by berri
Nov 08, 2009 (1:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Nov 07, 2009 6:30 pm)

I know what you mean about other elements besides reliability affecting the CR rating. The Fusion is the only midsize with full red dots on all aspects, but it was rated below Camry and Accord. However, the Lincoln MKS is specifically noted about below average reliability. The Dec issue also notes declining reliabilty in the MKX which I think is the Lincoln version of Edge.
#256 of 261
Re: Taurus and Lincoln MKS [berri] by brucelinc
Nov 08, 2009 (5:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: berri (Nov 08, 2009 1:30 pm)

I don't know the basis for CR's rating for the 2009 MKS but I could venture an educated guess. Early models had a problem with rear doors unlocking and then locking again. They had to replace the cable mechanism with a different length cable. Also, some AWD MKSs had an oil leak in the power take off unit due to a bad batch of seals.
 
Both of these issues have been corrected and should not impact the 2010 Taurus or 2010 MKS.
#257 of 261
Re: Taurus and Lincoln MKS [berri] by thegraduate
Nov 08, 2009 (8:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: berri (Nov 08, 2009 1:30 pm)

Actually, a car can be excellent in reliability but not be "recommended" by CR for other reasons (lousy acceleration, lacking certain safety equipment, etc).
#258 of 261
Re: 2010 Taurus brakes [bruneau1] by akirby
Nov 09, 2009 (6:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: bruneau1 (Nov 07, 2009 10:30 am)

Most Ford vehicles have brakes that feel slightly mushy. Doesn't affect stopping power, just feel. Switching to stainless steel brake lines can help. I notice it but it doesn't bother me.
#259 of 261
Taurus Sho by keithm1
Nov 14, 2009 (7:38 pm)
Reply
I purchased my SHO about a month ago. So far it's worked fine. I traded an '08 Sable. The Taurus has a much firmer suspension(SHO)It's much faster, with actually better mileage.You do need to use premium gas to get the "full" performance. The Sable did have better rear seat room, probably due to the higher roof line. The "Blis" warning system works fine, though I think if the light flashed it would get your attention better, especially in bright light. The Adaptive Cruise is great. It matches the car in front of you. Slows you down, then speeds you back up. There are 2 issues I've really seen. One is the headrests..They pretty much touch the back of your head. My partner didn't like it at first, but is now used to it. There have been complaints from some reviewers about it. Give yourself a little time. You get used to it pretty quick, it's really not that bad. The other is the lower seat back. I found it protruded somewhat into my lower back. Playing with the lumbar control seems to have cured that problem. I will say that after testing several cars.. I was down to the Pontiac G8 GXP,Cadillac CTS(premium) & the SHO. The CTS seats were without a doubt the most comfortable I ever sat in. I really like firm seats & these definately were "firm". The GXP had the performance I truely wanted.
   The Pontiac G8 GXP was my real choice, however I couldn't find any that weren't used as drag racers by "coked" out sales managers. Trust me I couldn't find any within 300 miles of me(New Hampshire)That had less than 5500K on them. It's true, the sales managers got them as their "own" demos & beat the crap out of them! If there had been any with low mileage(less than 500)The GXP would have been my final choice. I guess I could have done without all the "techno" goodies or the 25+ highway mph of the Taurus, but I think overall I made a damn good choice getting the SHO. It really gets compliments. People don't seem to know what it is!I guess there really ARE a lot of people out there who don't read auto magazines!
#260 of 261
first in person view 2010 taurus by pod
Nov 23, 2009 (8:47 am)
Reply
I did see my first 2010 Taurus today, the only one at a ford dealership. It was weekend hours so no oportunity to sit in or drive. Initial impressions: very much more modern sheetmetal styling, not nearly as big as expected when I stood next to it, the rear end really comes up very high. Couldn't tell much about the interior but concerned that the "flowing center console" might crimp the space for the driver's R leg/foot. The console widens as it comes back and there doesn't seem much room for the R leg to drift to the right when using cruise control or at rest. Is this a problem for 2010 owners? Overall much improved car. Sticker was something in the 34K range which is over my head. I am thinking of subsidizing it by renting out space in the trunk to a tribe of gypsies.
#261 of 261
Re: first in person view 2010 taurus [pod] by bruneau1
Nov 23, 2009 (10:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: pod (Nov 23, 2009 8:47 am)

We have had our SEL awd for about two months. It'd cinnamon metallic with light stone interior. Everyone who has seen it is impressed. We avoided the 255/45/19 tires and have a better ride, but had to give up some items, but nothing important.It is a wonderful highway cruiser and gets better mileage than expected. As far as seating room in the front, it is true that the console is big. But unless you are huge or really fat, there shouldn't be a problem. We also did not order a sunroof and enjoy the head room. The Sync lady came on last night while driving and asking me if I wanted weather, turn-by-turn directions, or vehicle health report or cancel. Since I haven't set up Sync yet, I said cancel. The best value of the Taurus line is the SEL. Get leather and Sync with back up warning, and you have a nicely equipped vehicle at a decent price. We paid $28,700 with Costco pricing, early order rebate, standard rebate, and 0% financing for 36 months. What a deal for a sweet car.

Messages Page 27 of 27
1
...
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement