You are here: Forums Sedans Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable 2010 Ford Taurus

2010 Ford Taurus

284 messages,  Last post on Dec 05, 2009 at 11:52 AM

You are in the Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Taurus, Automotive News, Future Vehicle, Sedan

Messages Page 26 of 29 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#246 of 284 Re: Same GM Guarantee [gregg_vw] by mp685 Oct 29, 2009 (2:12 am)
Replying to: gregg_vw (Oct 26, 2009 4:47 am) From Sept. 2008 to Sept. 2009, Ford's market share increased 2.6%, while GM's market share decreased 8.3% (Market Data Center -WSJ Online, October 29th 2009) We do agree, it will be nice to see the domestics reborn.
#247 of 284 Re: Taurus as example of gadget excess among others [thegraduate] by akirby Oct 29, 2009 (5:27 am)
Replying to: thegraduate (Oct 28, 2009 4:22 pm) I've looked in my mirrors, saw nothing, only to lookover my shoulder and prepare to merge when I see a motorcycle in my blind spot.   Exactly - using your mirrors (properly adjusted) and glancing over your shoulder means you have no blind spot.   I think BLIS is fine as an added safety measure - for those times when you forget to glance over your shoulder or you don't like having your mirrors adjusted that way. But I do not see it as a necessity or a huge safety improvement. Replies to this message: marsha7 (Oct 29, 2009 6:48 am) berri (Oct 29, 2009 5:26 pm)
#248 of 284 Re: Taurus as example of gadget excess among others [akirby] by marsha7 Oct 29, 2009 (6:48 am)
Replying to: akirby (Oct 29, 2009 5:27 am) This is just a personal finding...I have installed on my outside mirrors a 3 inch adjustable blind spot mirror...so, on my drivers side I have the flat mirror plus 3" convex, and, with the 2 combined, I believe I have eliminated my blind spot...same on the passenger side, which has the stock convex and the additional "more convex" mirror...it works for me, and because they are adjustable ($4.00 each) I can move the mirror on the mirror any way I want...might be worth trying...
#249 of 284 Re: Taurus as example of gadget excess among others [pod] by british_rover Oct 29, 2009 (7:19 am)
Replying to: pod (Oct 28, 2009 4:07 pm) I have driven 100s of Volvos with BLISS and it does work well.   There is a button on the dash to turn it off if you are getting a lot of false negatives in stop and go bumper to bumper traffic. It will pick up motorcycles and it does pick up a car a couple of car lengths before it enters your blind spot.   With the size of the pillars in modern cars and the currently in style coupe like rear profile the back C pillar in a sedan can be quite large. One of the worst offenders of this is the new Lexus IS models. Go drive one of those and check out the enormous blind spot. Just backing one up is difficult with the huge rear pillars and enormous bangle butt trunk.   I don't think Lexus offers a BLISS type system on that car but they do offer a backup camera and you need one.
#250 of 284 Re: Taurus as example of gadget excess among others [akirby] by berri Oct 29, 2009 (5:26 pm)
Replying to: akirby (Oct 29, 2009 5:27 am) Here's the thing though, Ford has models with or without these gadgets so it shouldn't really be a buyer concern.
#251 of 284 2010 Taurus brakes by bruneau1 Nov 07, 2009 (10:30 am)
We have a 2010 Taurus SEL which we like very much. However, I wonder if anyone else has a negative opinion about the feel of the brake pedal: Mushy. Also, I notice that the rear wheels have more brake dust than the fronts. This reminds me of the situation with our Freestyle and wonder if we are going to have the same problems with the rear brakes. Replies to this message: akirby (Nov 09, 2009 6:02 am)
#252 of 284 Taurus and Lincoln MKS by berri Nov 07, 2009 (2:07 pm)
The latest Consumer Reports put a don't recommend on the Lincoln MKS which is made in the Taurus plant. I wonder if that is a bad omen? I know its platform is based on a Volvo and those cars seem to have declined in quality over the past decade. The Taurus is newer than the MKS so I hope they fixed whatever issues led to the CR knock because it seems like a nice car. Replies to this message: british_rover (Nov 07, 2009 2:12 pm) thegraduate (Nov 07, 2009 6:30 pm) berri (Nov 08, 2009 1:30 pm) brucelinc (Nov 08, 2009 5:29 pm) thegraduate (Nov 08, 2009 8:12 pm)
#253 of 284 Re: Taurus and Lincoln MKS [berri] by british_rover Nov 07, 2009 (2:12 pm)
Replying to: berri (Nov 07, 2009 2:07 pm) Volvos have actually improved over the last decade.   A 1999 or 2000 S80 or XC70 could be a very troublesome scary car.   A 2005 or 2006 S80 or XC70 was usually fine.   A 2007 of either one are great cars.   The 2010s and up are fantastic too.
#254 of 284 Re: Taurus and Lincoln MKS [berri] by thegraduate Nov 07, 2009 (6:30 pm)
Replying to: berri (Nov 07, 2009 2:07 pm) Not recommended doesn't mean unreliable. What was the reliability rating? Replies to this message: berri (Nov 08, 2009 1:30 pm) brucelinc (Nov 08, 2009 5:29 pm) thegraduate (Nov 08, 2009 8:12 pm)
#255 of 284 Re: Taurus and Lincoln MKS [thegraduate] by berri Nov 08, 2009 (1:30 pm)
Replying to: thegraduate (Nov 07, 2009 6:30 pm) I know what you mean about other elements besides reliability affecting the CR rating. The Fusion is the only midsize with full red dots on all aspects, but it was rated below Camry and Accord. However, the Lincoln MKS is specifically noted about below average reliability. The Dec issue also notes declining reliabilty in the MKX which I think is the Lincoln version of Edge. Replies to this message: brucelinc (Nov 08, 2009 5:29 pm) thegraduate (Nov 08, 2009 8:12 pm)

Messages Page 26 of 29 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Sedans Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable 2010 Ford Taurus