- #21 of 275
-
Re: 2010 Taurus pricing [akirby]
by bruneau1
-
Mar 10, 2009 (8:47 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: akirby (Feb 18, 2009 6:21 am)
I think the pricing of the 2010 Taurus is appropriate. However, i am dismayed to see that they will put 45v tires on the Limited. that means the best ride and noise levels are on the SE and SEL where not all the desirable equipment is available. Kind of stupid. i would prefer the SEL because of the 55h series tires, but it has a one CD base player. If you want the Sony outfit, you must buy the unpleasant tires. I guess they figure you need a more powerful stereo to compensate for the increased road noise!!!
|
- #22 of 275
-
Re: 2010 Taurus pricing [bruneau1]
by akirby
-
Mar 10, 2009 (9:10 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: bruneau1 (Mar 10, 2009 8:47 am)
Most dealers will swap them for you. You should wait and test drive both just to be safe - there might not be as much difference as you're expecting.
|
- #23 of 275
-
I saw the 2010
by marsha7
-
Mar 15, 2009 (2:10 pm)
-
|
|
Taurus at the Atlanta Auto Show today...looks impressive, esp next to the 2009 Taurus, which I drove as a loaner car and was mildly impressed with it...the 2010 was roped off on a pedestal, we could look but not touch or sit...is there a direct LIncoln version of the 2010, or will the MKS continue to look like the 2009 Taurus???
|
- #24 of 275
-
Re: I saw the 2010 [marsha7]
by thegraduate
-
Mar 15, 2009 (3:14 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: marsha7 (Mar 15, 2009 2:10 pm)
Um, the MKS is the version of the 2010 Taurus I believe.
Sing with me! One of these things is not like the other...
|
- #25 of 275
-
Re: I saw the 2010 [thegraduate]
by gregg_vw
-
Mar 15, 2009 (5:49 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Mar 15, 2009 3:14 pm)
The photos show that the MKS bears a lot more relationship with the 2010 Taurus than the 2009 Taurus. However, it is too bad that the proportions and shapes and lines of the MKS are not actually more like the 2010 Taurus. The MKS added to the front overhang and deleted some cabin space, and for what? It is not an outstanding design--though it is better than the 2009 Taurus/Montego, It is not as balanced and fresh as the 2010 Taurus. They were stuck with it, as it was far along in development, before Ford realized the depth of the trouble they were in. It is selling ok for what it is, and thank goodness Lincoln at least has this model to market now. Hopefully, more innovative stuff, like the Concept C (even if you hate it, it is a new direction and shows real creativity) is in the pipeline...cuz the MKS doesn't have any long-term staying power.
|
- #26 of 275
-
Re: I saw the 2010 [gregg_vw]
by akirby
-
Mar 16, 2009 (6:01 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: gregg_vw (Mar 15, 2009 5:49 pm)
Yep - the only thing they had time to change on the MKS was the nose. I expect a mid cycle refresh to clean up the rest like they did on the Taurus. But I wouldn't expect it to look just like the Taurus body. In fact I'm sure it won't share ANY sheetmetal. Now when's the last time you could have predicted that about a Lincoln sharing a Ford platform?
|
- #27 of 275
-
Re: I saw the 2010 [akirby]
by gregg_vw
-
Mar 16, 2009 (7:03 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: akirby (Mar 16, 2009 6:01 am)
You have to go back to the Crown Vic and Town Car. The TC got its own wheelbase, body panels, interior...even a different windshield. About time Ford-Lincoln returns to that sort of differentiation. Good to see.
|
- #28 of 275
-
Looks like a winner......
by fdcapt2
-
Mar 24, 2009 (12:56 am)
-
|
 I've been doing lots of research on the SHO, as well as the Limited. They seem to be well designed cars, and the interior is very nice. I'm having a tough time thinking about what I might miss on my '06 Passat V6. This car has everything, and then some. Prior to 2003, all my cars were either Ford or Mercury products. I really don't have many complaints on the VW, or the car before it, a '03 Acura TL. I always preached buy American, and now it looks like I might do just that, again. Anyone with some input, feel free to give me your thoughts. Thanks.....
John
|
- #29 of 275
-
Re: Looks like a winner...... [fdcapt2]
by bobgwtw
-
Mar 24, 2009 (8:32 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: fdcapt2 (Mar 24, 2009 12:56 am)
I understand your position. Tha last American car I owned was a 73 Pontiac Grand Am. Swore I'd never buy another Big 3 product after my many expensive problems with it; and the crappiest service I've ever experienced. There's been 15 new cars since that time, all Japanese; & they've all run 150 - 200,000 miles without a problem.
That said, I'm looking forward to seriously evaluating the 10 Fusion & Taurus, Lincoln MKZ; & the New Buick Lacrosse - If GM is still around. Timing is right for me; the 06 Avalon is coming up on 150,000 in a couple of months & if any of these cars are as good as they appear to be I might just give the big 2 - forget Chrysler - another chance.
|
- #30 of 275
-
Re: Looks like a winner...... [bobgwtw]
by gregg_vw
-
Mar 25, 2009 (4:39 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: bobgwtw (Mar 24, 2009 8:32 pm)
Why not buy American? The cars are just as good and the prices are often better.Sure, American cars were crappier in the 1970s (30 to 40 years ago...how is that relevant now?), and even into the 1980s and early 1990s. But there is no reason to believe you will have a better experience buyiing a Mazda6 over a Fusion or an ES350 over a 2010 LaCrosse. The 2010 Taurus should be a reliable winner as well.
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans 
