Sign In Join 



Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan Hybrid

1054 messages,  Last post on Nov 01, 2009 at 2:52 PM

You are in the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan Hybrid Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Hybrid Cars, Sedan


Messages Page 84 of 106
1
...
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
...
106
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#828 of 1054
Re: Why hybrid? [fusion_female] by rogerinvermont
Jun 22, 2009 (7:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: fusion_female (Jun 21, 2009 9:14 pm)

If money is the only reason -- probably not. Others have stated well the reasons.
 
Particularly if you want to lease, there is little financial reason to hybridize. Certainly not with a FFH. Maybe a Honda Insight -- much cheaper.
 
Monetarily speaking, the $64 question is what the price of diesel fuel will be vis-a-vis gasoline. These new diesel engine cars get wonderful mileage, and with the new now sulphur fuel dont stink.
 
The other questions you need to answer to get a better fiscal answer:
 
highway vs city vs surburban driving. Hybrids shine city driving.
 
length and depth of cold weather -- hybrids must run the engine to warm you and the batteries -- less saving in cold weather.
 
I gotta tell you --- the FFH is a wonderful automobile with, for me, the right size.
 
Let us know your decision.
 
Rog in Vermont
#829 of 1054
Re: Why hybrid [hoyafan] by rogerinvermont
Jun 22, 2009 (8:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: hoyafan (Jun 22, 2009 5:34 am)

More specifically, the warranty is 10 years/150K miles if you are in a california emissions state.
 
And it is a full warranty; it is NOT prorated based on the life of the battery.
 
As a purchaser of a new, expensive, high-tech automobile, I have the fear that something post-warranty will die and Ford will demand my children's birthright to fix it. The high-voltage battery is the least of the worries, because of the high-mileage warranty.
 
The five california emission states are California, New York, Maine, Massachusetts, and Vermont.
 
Rog in Vermont
#830 of 1054
Re: Why hybrid? [fusion_female] by cmuniz
Jun 22, 2009 (11:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: fusion_female (Jun 21, 2009 9:14 pm)

My economic analysis indicated that it would take me 42 months to break even on buying at FFH vs a loaded I4 based on gas savings alone. I went ahead and bought one because I really like the technology. It is a very fun car to drive and it continuously amazes how often the engine turns on and off and how the power vs economy vs battery charging is managed by the computer. The enjoyment factor alone makes it worthwhile for me, plus the car can teach you how to drive it economically if you pay attention to the gauges. So I agree that it is not an economic decision, but one based on other factors as discussed above. Of course you never know what will happen to the price of gas, but it is still fun to go over 550 miles per tank. I'm averaging 34.2 mpg so far in the month since we got it.
#831 of 1054
Re: Why hybrid? [fusion_female] by explorerx4
Jun 22, 2009 (4:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fusion_female (Jun 22, 2009 5:07 am)

if you are leasing, you don't drive a lot of miles?
FFH would be tough to justify in a normal leasing situation.
#832 of 1054
Re: Why hybrid? [fusion_female] by WyattNichols
Jun 22, 2009 (5:41 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fusion_female (Jun 22, 2009 5:07 am)

I agree with the previous posts that it would be a long time before the FFH would pay for itself.
 
If you didn't buy a FFH, but were looking at a 4 cylinder or V6 Fusion, then I would recommend the 4 cyl over the FFH and the FFH over the V6. Don't forget the tax credit, I believe $1,700, you get for buying a FFH.
 
The FFH does well with city driving. Driving like "a little old lady" (how my wife describes my driving), I easily get 42+ mpg after the ICE is hot and the temperature is below 85F. I haven't had that mpg because half of my driving is at interstate speeds and recently temperatures are 95-100F. A non-hybrid car would get a similar, or worse mpg decrease in hot temperatures.
#833 of 1054
Actual MPG for FFH by WyattNichols
Jun 22, 2009 (5:53 pm)
Reply
Has anyone kept track of their gas receipts and computed their mpg based on the gasoline purchased vs. the readout from the car?
 
I have. At my last fillup, 4673.0 miles, I had bought and thus burned or evaporated 123.91 gals (37.7 mpg), but the readout on my long term dash mpg was 38.9. The difference being about 3.5 gals.
 
I know there are measurement errors all around, but is this within the limits expected for the car's calculation or fuel pumps?
#834 of 1054
Re: Actual MPG for FFH [WyattNichols] by akirby
Jun 22, 2009 (7:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: WyattNichols (Jun 22, 2009 5:53 pm)

Did you reset the computer mpg when you filled up? You're only talking about a 3% difference. I think that's well within the margin of error for the pump or the computer.
#835 of 1054
Re: Actual MPG for FFH [akirby] by WyattNichols
Jun 23, 2009 (1:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: akirby (Jun 22, 2009 7:03 pm)

Did you reset the computer mpg when you filled up?
 
No. I'm using the long term mpg since I picked up the car.
 
I have checked the mpg for each of the 10 tanks of gas I've bought. As it should be, the average mpg for these 10 tanks of gas was basically the same as the total gals bought divided into the total miles.
 
Yeah, I didn't think 3% off was all that bad, unless everybody else was getting a difference below the car's reported mpg. True measurement error should be distributed on both sides of the car's reported mpg.
#836 of 1054
Re: Actual MPG for FFH [WyattNichols] by acdii
Jun 23, 2009 (6:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: WyattNichols (Jun 23, 2009 1:57 am)

One of the factors involved with the trip computer is the speedometer calibration. I don't know how many others have noticed, the speedo is set a little higher than the actual speed, but the odometer is dead on. I couldnt tell you how many times I passed one of those speed signs that shows your MPH, and what is reported is roughly 3-5 MPH lower than the reading on the dash. To confirm I checked with the police departments of several towns and the county, the speed boards are all calibrated correctly, and it wasn't just my Camry, but all the cars I drive or have driven show the same thing. With the exception of my F350, the trip computers are actually accurate if you take into account the difference between the speedometer readout and the true MPH. This is why hand calculating is important to getting your true MPG of any car.
#837 of 1054
Re: Actual MPG for FFH [acdii] by akirby
Jun 23, 2009 (6:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: acdii (Jun 23, 2009 6:15 am)

There is one of those on my drive home every day. It is exactly 1 mph lower than my speedometer (06 SEL V6 FWD). It says 40, my speedometer says 41 mph.

Messages Page 84 of 106
1
...
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
...
106
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement