Sign In Join 



Dude, where did all the dealerships go?

657 messages,  Last post on Dec 04, 2009 at 11:37 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Car Buying, Automotive News, Legislation


Messages Page 52 of 66
1
...
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
...
66
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#508 of 657
Re: Dallas Dodge Dealer [mikefm58] by gagrice
May 20, 2009 (8:07 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mikefm58 (May 20, 2009 6:38 pm)

I cannot imagine a dealer giving him more than 50 cents on the dollar. What is protecting him from the next round of cuts? Also Chrysler may never build another Dodge. Didn't they close down production in December. Are they back building anything? Jeep would be the only line worth keeping. And the new rules targeted the Jeep specifically as a gas guzzler.
 
Just proves anytime the government gets involved things get worse.
#509 of 657
Re: Dallas Dodge Dealer [gagrice] by mikefm58
May 21, 2009 (4:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (May 20, 2009 8:07 pm)

Didn't they close down production in December. Are they back building anything?
 
Yep, all their manufacturing plants are completely shutdown due to the BK and don't expect to open again until they come out of it. I've had my eye on a Dodge Challenger for a couple of months but am now having second thoughts, can't see spending $30K+++ when they're BK. I may consider a Sebring convertible though, one year old low mileage ones are going for under $16K, with an original MSRP north of $30K+++.
#510 of 657
Re: Dallas Dodge Dealer [mikefm58] by gagrice
May 21, 2009 (5:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: mikefm58 (May 21, 2009 4:39 am)

I would not count the creditors out yet on liquidating Chrysler. There is some very vocal Union pension funds calling for C7 to get what is owed them.
 
Last updated: May 20 2009 23:11
Funds move to halt Chrysler restructuring
Three of Chrysler’s secured creditors are mounting a fresh attempt to thwart the carmaker’s Chapter 11 reorganisation on the grounds that it violates their legal rights and the US government’s authority under the Troubled asset relief programme.
 
However, the Indiana State Teachers’ Retirement Fund said on Wednesday that it had a fiduciary responsibility to its members to continue the fight. The fund stands to lose $4.6m under the current settlement proposal and has teamed up with Richard Mourdock, Indiana state treasurer, to try to recover those losses.
 
The latest objections could galvanise other lenders to renew their challenge. “I fully support their motion and believe a number of lenders (including us) will ultimately join their group,” said George Schultze of Schultze Asset Management, one of the creditors that had abandoned an earlier legal fight.
 
In a court filing on Wednesday, the Indiana funds accused the government of adopting a strategy of “the ends justify the means”.
 
They also said the Treasury “has taken constructive possession of Chrysler and is requiring it to adopt a sale plan in bankruptcy that violates the most fundamental principles of creditor rights – that first-tier secured creditors have absolute priority”.

 
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b3c8beb8-4564-11de-b6c8-00144feabdc0.html
 
I would say the forced closings of dealerships could be also construed as illegal. If it was legal why did GM pay dealers $billions when they quit making Oldsmobile.
#511 of 657
Re: Dallas Dodge Dealer [gagrice] by mikefm58
May 21, 2009 (6:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (May 21, 2009 5:16 am)

I almost hate to say it, but they're right. My understanding is that in any bankruptcy, the secured creditors get theirs first, everyone else is behind them. Why should they accept millions in dollars of losses, when complete liquidation will return their money, dollar for dollar, or something close.
 
I ain't no Philadelphia lawyer, but I believe most BK laws are written to uphold that.
#512 of 657
Re: Dallas Dodge Dealer [mikefm58] by gagrice
May 21, 2009 (6:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: mikefm58 (May 21, 2009 6:36 am)

I ain't no Philadelphia lawyer, but I believe most BK laws are written to uphold that.
 
It is as basic as our Constitution's 5th Amendment. The big banks were happy to take 30 cents on the dollar as the Treasury was giving them a lot more than that through the back door of the bank with TARP. All the little guys and small pension funds are just expected to roll over and say yes Mr. President we want the shaft.
#513 of 657
Re: Dallas Dodge Dealer [gagrice] by mikefm58
May 21, 2009 (7:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (May 21, 2009 6:56 am)

It is as basic as our Constitution's 5th Amendment
 
I was watching a special on CNN about this very subject and the guy was saying that if this does go ahead as Obama is planing, it will fundamentally change the rules of business and will have some very serious long term ramifications.
 
Why would any investor, foreign or domestic, (think China here) in his right frame of mind invest in the US if the federal govt. could basically rewrite the BK laws at any time and screw the secured creditors?
#514 of 657
Re: Dallas Dodge Dealer [gagrice] by euphonium
May 21, 2009 (11:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (May 21, 2009 5:16 am)

I would say the forced closings of dealerships could be also construed as illegal. If it was legal why did GM pay dealers $billions when they quit making Oldsmobile.
 
GM was not going through BK at the time F E Olds was retired. It may be that the BK laws allow the dumping of inventory where ever it is.
 
I would be surprised if the franchise agreement included any verbiage covering the present emergency.
 
I look forward to all such dealers to form an alliance & instigate a class action suit against Obama/Chrysler.
#515 of 657
GM Chrysler by farout
May 22, 2009 (1:17 pm)
Reply
GM is being more reasonable that Chrysler is with it's dealers
#516 of 657
huh? by tomcatt630
May 22, 2009 (10:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: euphonium (May 21, 2009 11:46 am)

In the fall before the election, Chrysler was ready to go belly up and GW gave them bailout. Some have short memory and think Ma Mopar was humming along building 1968 Hemi Road Runners, and Obama came in and took over.
 
With dealers suing, Mopar will die off and then all their dealers will close, then will they be happy?
#517 of 657
Re: huh? [tomcatt630] by dtownfb
May 23, 2009 (5:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tomcatt630 (May 22, 2009 10:47 pm)

Yeah, everything was hunky dorey before Jan. 20th. GM and Chrysler were making huge profits until big bad Obama came and ruined these two legendary companies. Forget that Chrysler was $8B in debt with no products in their pipeline. And GM is only $60B in debt not counting their VEBA commitments.
 
Imagine the fury if the government let them go bankrupt. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Messages Page 52 of 66
1
...
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
...
66
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement