Sign In Join 



Worst Car of 2008 - Your nominees

110 messages,  Last post on Dec 15, 2008 at 12:51 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Car Comparisons


Messages Page 7 of 12
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
12
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#52 of 110
Re: Worst looking... [joshuag] by chikoo
Nov 17, 2008 (3:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: joshuag (Nov 17, 2008 1:56 pm)

>What about the new Chevy Malibu
 
The rear appears to be designed by somebody who knew NOTHING about the front and interior. Totally stupid.
 
Doesn't GM even know that most people see the rear of a car for longer than the front? Not because they want to, but because that is what happens when you are on a road. You see the front side for couple of seconds when the car goes by you. But you keep looking at the rear since you are following it.
 
Bleh!
#53 of 110
Re: Worst looking... [chikoo] by dm1212
Nov 17, 2008 (3:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chikoo (Nov 17, 2008 3:12 pm)

I'm going to have to say the worst car of 2008 is the Dodge Nitro. The Nitro is a piece of crap. The interior is hidious, the exterior even worse then interior, horrible gas mileage, small, horrible reliability, and Dodge Badging.
 
And the 09 Worst Car is for sure...the Journey, even worse then the Nitro.
 
Chrysler should give up, they make hidious, unreliable vehicles, that don't even appeal to people above the age of 70.
 
The Jeep Patriot and Compass are in the running aswell. I know I sure as hell don't want a SUV that is powerless, and can't even handle snow, yet alone rocks. I would be more comfortable off-roading in my 05 A6!
#54 of 110
worst looking --09 acura TL/tsx by sweendogy
Nov 17, 2008 (5:45 pm)
Reply
looks like someone made a big mistake with the front end -- also a 5 speed auto --hello
 
Worst Car --easy SMART CAR-- 2 seat car--under powered-- bad transmission-- MPG's no better then a larger civic-- 2 year wntte, dealer network, zero to 60 in 2 days and worst of all expensive for the package.
#55 of 110
Re: Worst looking... [joshuag] by andre1969
Nov 17, 2008 (5:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: joshuag (Nov 17, 2008 1:56 pm)

What about the new Chevy Malibu. I think it is a whole lot better looking then the Accord or Camry. Most all the car magazines agree with me on that. Switch over to GM, they need you.
 
Actually, I do like the Malibu overall. There are some minor details that I'm not too crazy about, but could live with. For instance, something about the nose of the car just looks swollen to me, but then so does the Camry. And the rear of the Malibu just seems a bit unfinished, somehow. Not hideous, but just a bit awkward. While I would consider a Malibu, I think I'd probably choose a Saturn Aura instead. Same basic package, but just more attractive IMO.
 
Another car in this class that I want to like, but it irritates me that they don't put more effort into the base model, is the Ford Fusion. I like the style of them, and think it's a nice, space-efficient package. Not too big on the outside, but big enough on the inside for my tastes. But with the 4-cyl, you get mediocre fuel economy and performance that's pretty lame by today's standards. That's probably not enough to nominate it for 2008's worst, but it still irritates me.
#56 of 110
Re: Worst looking... [andre1969] by steve_ HOST
Nov 17, 2008 (7:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 17, 2008 5:50 pm)

I like the xB and the Element and the Prius has grown on me. Looks are just so subjective - lots of people liked the looks of the Aztec enough to buy them. Maybe it looks better sitting inside it.
 
Paint the cladding and you could even convince me to drive a Baja around for the right price. Its saving grace is that it can't be a nominee for the '08 awards.
#57 of 110
Sorry but.... by tiff_c
Nov 17, 2008 (8:02 pm)
Reply
The Aveo still reeks and is essentially a rebadged Daewoo. It's truly awful. Granted the Suzuki Reno is also a bad car and also a Daewoo.
The FJ Cruiser has poor visibility that's a fact but it's not really ugly and it's extremely reliable. Poor sales due to low fuel economy. I don't think the Dodges are all that ugly either. Some less than others, but overall not horrible. The Aveo is a real competitor to the Yugo and is about as reliable. It's ugly, unreliable, uncomfortable and gets poor fuel economy.
I would give a Nod also to the Suzuki Reno as another piece of rebadged crap.
Why can't Suzuki bring the Swift Sport to the US?
Besides a Truck isn't a car and most trucks look Butch, and most look like trucks.
The SmartCar is also another ugly car and I like hatchbacks! I hate VW's because of poor reliability but I like the look of the Golf and the new Jetta Sportwagen.
The Smart Car is a waste of money but some people like the look, it's retro-futuristic. All it needs is Woody Allen to make it complete.
Aveo = Total Crap Yugo Wannabe
#58 of 110
Re: but [nippononly] by gmctruck
Nov 17, 2008 (8:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Nov 15, 2008 12:28 pm)

"worst car" honors can't be based ONLY on looks. It has to be the worst package overall... nippononly
 
Well you can bet that anything built by GM will be falling apart shortly after the warranty expires if not before.
#59 of 110
Re: but [gmctruck] by boaz47
Nov 17, 2008 (9:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gmctruck (Nov 17, 2008 8:36 pm)

"Well you can bet that anything built by GM will be falling apart shortly after the warranty expires if not before."
 
And there is the beauty of nominating the Reno. You don't have to wait till the warrentee for it to fall apart. From the dependability studies you can watch it fall apart right before your eyes. Maybe even faster than a VW? Well maybe not that fast but pretty quick. Faster than a Kia Reo? Well even they are rated better than a Reno.
 
But I still say darn the luck the Subaru Baja is gone. It was an easy pick. But then the Scions aren't pretty and they aren't Toyota dependable so there is still hope.
#60 of 110
Re: but [boaz47] by steve_ HOST
Nov 17, 2008 (9:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (Nov 17, 2008 9:21 pm)

But then the Scions aren't pretty and they aren't Toyota dependable so there is still hope.
 
I think I already mentioned that I like Scions and my wife would buy an xD tomorrow.
 
I haven't looked at JD Power but guess who tops the chart of the CR Predicted Reliability Rankings for '09 models?
#61 of 110
Re: but [steve_] by boaz47
Nov 17, 2008 (9:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Nov 17, 2008 9:29 pm)

JD powers has Scions below average. But CR has rated 2009 cars before 2009? I am sure they don't rate the Reno at the top of their list. Sounds like them rate the car first and then see how they hold up. But I have never hid my dislike of the xB. I wouldn't ride in one to a dog fight let alone drive one to a dog fight. Any car designed by etch a sketch just goes against the grain. They even managed to make it less desirable to the target demographic with the redesign. But I know people who like them, they were the same ones that bought a Aztec when they first came out I am sure. The xD neither offends me nor excites me. Lots of other cars in their class that do what they are supposed to do with better fuel economy. Still a 16 month sales slump for Scion has to indicate something no matter what CR thinks. And the person doing the article was interesting saying that dependability doesn't stop him or her from buying a car they like. I had to smirk. I can be the same way if I like a car but I just can't get passed dependability and ugly. But the question was worst car of 2008. Scion has plenty of time to drop in a year.

Messages Page 7 of 12
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
12
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement