You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
Worst Car of 2008 - Your nominees

110 messages, Last post on Dec 15, 2008 at 12:51 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: joshuag (Nov 17, 2008 9:53 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: guss (Nov 17, 2008 10:54 am) Short of being,in fact "short", the car comes up short in every objective category you judge a car on.and "cute" don't count! |
|
| Listen to thing purr next to a gas pump. Be gone ugly Ford and d.... GMC big SUV | |
|
Replying to: guss (Nov 17, 2008 10:54 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Nov 17, 2008 11:58 am) |
|
|
Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 16, 2008 5:13 pm) |
|
|
Shouldn't the worst car be, Ugly, have poor sales, and be rated as unreliable? The Reno fits all three. Right now universally the Element and xB are ugly. But are somewhat dependable. The Prius is very ugly but dependable as well and sells better than average. The only thing rated less dependable than the Suzuki is the Land rover and they are not considered ugly by most. I would also agree the Smart earns a place on the list due to its failure to meet even one of the promises it offered when it was introduced. It cost more than several bigger vehicles in its class. It doesn't get better fuel mileage than some less expensive vehicles in its class. And its cuteness wore off rather quickly. It has been in the red in Europe almost from its first introduction. The Kia Reo isn't a stunner and is down there with VW and Suzuki in dependability. It would seem that the worst cars would have to come from the least dependable vehicles we could buy or if we are voting for ugly the Element, Prius, and xB are in a class all by themselves.
|
|
|
Replying to: boaz47 (Nov 17, 2008 2:07 pm) You really want it to lay a total egg. Grant you ont every year can produce an Edsel or an Aztek but we should identify those clearly trying to. |
|
|
Replying to: joshuag (Nov 17, 2008 1:56 pm) The rear appears to be designed by somebody who knew NOTHING about the front and interior. Totally stupid. Doesn't GM even know that most people see the rear of a car for longer than the front? Not because they want to, but because that is what happens when you are on a road. You see the front side for couple of seconds when the car goes by you. But you keep looking at the rear since you are following it. Bleh!
|
|
|
Replying to: chikoo (Nov 17, 2008 3:12 pm) And the 09 Worst Car is for sure...the Journey, even worse then the Nitro. Chrysler should give up, they make hidious, unreliable vehicles, that don't even appeal to people above the age of 70. The Jeep Patriot and Compass are in the running aswell. I know I sure as hell don't want a SUV that is powerless, and can't even handle snow, yet alone rocks. I would be more comfortable off-roading in my 05 A6! |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
Worst Car of 2008 - Your nominees
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats