Sign In Join 



50 Worst Cars of All Time

298 messages,  Last post on May 11, 2009 at 1:53 PM

You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Automotive News, Classic Cars, Coupe, Convertible, Truck, Sedan, Wagon


Messages Page 5 of 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
30
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#38 of 298
Re: Aztek was a shoe-in for this list. [dpalka] by fintail
Nov 15, 2008 (8:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: dpalka (Nov 14, 2008 6:41 pm)

When I was a kid, a young woman who worked for my dad bought a new Yugo. I think this would have been in 1987 or 1988. The thing lost its transmission when it was 6 weeks old, and had endless other problems at the same time. Those cars made Chevettes look like a Lexus, no doubt.
 
At that same time my dad knew a guy who bought a new Chevy Beretta that was an absolute lemon, every electrical glitch known to man, and the drivers door hinges actually broke and the door fell off, when parked in a grocery store parking lot. This is why people started running to Camcords.
#39 of 298
by dpalka
Nov 17, 2008 (6:23 pm)
Reply
Don't know if the Cadillac Cimmaron would qualify as one of the worse cars of all time, but I do know that once people found out that they were buying a Chevy engine under a Caddy body, that was all she wrote for that model. I still wonder what genius came up with that idea?
#40 of 298
Re: [dpalka] by burdawg
Nov 18, 2008 (7:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: dpalka (Nov 17, 2008 6:23 pm)

I have to take these kind of lists with a grain of salt. The bias of the person creating it has to considered. That shows through here with the SUV's and large engine complaints. These were being produced since that is what the feedback from the public showed that there would be a demand for at that time.
American manufacturers have pretty much produced what Americans want to buy - large SUV's while gas was relatively cheap - crappy little fuel economizers when it's not. It has to really frustrating trying to predict what a fickle public will be interested in a few years out.
A good example is the EV1, which many people demonize GM over now. GM jumped into it with there own money under the illusion that California would come through with their part of the equation and have public recharging stations available along with incentives for private industry to do the same, and the federal government would follow suit later on. None or very little of that ever materialized. I remember seeing maps in the LA Times of where these public charge stations would be located. Time moved on, fuel prices stayed low, which led to the outcome that is now history.
#41 of 298
Re: [dpalka] by andre1969
Nov 18, 2008 (7:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: dpalka (Nov 17, 2008 6:23 pm)

The Cimarron seemed like a good idea at the time. It was designed in an era where gas was expensive and relatively rare, and the EPA was breathing down GM's neck to get more fuel efficient cars out there. Plus, small upscale cars like BMW and Mercedes Benz were skyrocketing in popularity.
 
Unfortunately, the end result was essentially a $12,000 Cavalier. Eventually they started putting Chevy V-6es in them, which made them better performers, but it was still just a gussied up Cavalier.
 
Quality-wise, I wouldn't call them the worst car of all time. After all, it was 1982 and a lot of cars were horrible. Both foreign and domestic, truth be told, so it wasn't just the Big Three, although they certainly did take "horrible" to new heights in that era! But I think it was just a symbol of how far Cadillac had fallen.
 
Cadillac had started slipping in 1971, and I'd say 1982 was when they hit rock-bottom. The Cimarron was crap. Anything with the 4.1 V-8 or Olds Diesel was crap, and those two engines covered just about everything else. About the only saving grace was if you bought the factory limo. It still used a Cadillac 368 V-8, and I think it was still using the beefy old THM400 transmission. It's only flaw was the V-8-6-4 cylinder de-activation, but supposedly it wasn't hard to just disconnect that.
 
Overall, 1982 was just a horrible year for Cadillac's reputation (although at the time, they sold well in spite of the recession), and I think the Cimarron was just the "crowning glory" of that.
#42 of 298
Re: [andre1969] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Nov 18, 2008 (7:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 18, 2008 7:34 am)

Probably the worst part about the Cimarron was the idea that GM thought it was going to get away with this blatant rip-off. It really did irritate the American car buying public, and they didn't like the idea that GM thought them that stupid. I guess it would be like Mercedes putting badges on a Passat and charging you $50K for it.
#43 of 298
Re: [Mr_Shiftright] by andre1969
Nov 18, 2008 (7:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 18, 2008 7:45 am)

I just spec'ed out a 1982 Cimarron, for kicks. Now it has a $12,181 base price. Air conditioning, power steering, an AM/FM stereo, leather wrapped steering wheel, and twin power mirrors were standard.
 
However, by the time I added in all the power stuff, cruise control, an automatic transmission, tape player, tilt wheel, and a sunroof, I come out with $14,103!
 
I wonder what a comparable BMW 3-series would have cost back in 1982? Now, no self-respecting 3-series should have an automatic, so to take the automatic out of the Cimarron and make it comparable, it's at $13,733. I doubt if a 3-series was much more expensive. I guess a Benz C-class would've been up in the stratosphere, though.
 
Cadillac did a much better job of turning a sow's ear into a silk purse, IMO, with the 1975 Cadillac Seville. While it was based on the Chevy Nova, they did a good job at hiding that fact. Plus, at least it had a bit of exclusivity with the standard fuel-injected Olds 350 V-8, something you couldn't get in any other X-car. It was also longer, had a roomier back seat, and was about 700-800 lb heavier than a Nova, so it was much more substantial. I'll have to admit though, that when I've sat in these first-gen Sevilles, I was a bit disappointed. I thought they'd be roomier and more comfy, but I guess being based on the Nova, they could only do so much with the seating position. I think all the extra room actually went into the back seat. I'd probably be happier with a '75 Dodge Dart Special Edition, although looks-wise, they're kinda dumpy compared to a Seville.
#44 of 298
Re: [andre1969] by fintail
Nov 18, 2008 (8:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 18, 2008 7:59 am)

Yeah back then I think a normal W123 was around 20K, a coupe around 25K, and the S-class was in the 40s even in 1982. There was no real C-class equivalent until 1984, when the W201 (190 series) hit these shores. IIRC it started around 20K then too, in 4-banger form. When the E-class was first seen here in 86, it based at about 40K, then! You can get a base E350 today for around 50K...not much inflation for 22 years.
 
I agree the 75 Seville was a good job of repackaging, I suspect few realize its roots. It's the most elegant domestic of that era, for sure.
#45 of 298
Re: If ya wanna get picky... [andys120] by captain2
Nov 18, 2008 (10:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: andys120 (Nov 13, 2008 5:37 pm)

the Opel Kadette actually predates any efforts by Chevy to build an 'economy car' going all the way back into the 50s. The earliest Kadettes (Kadet?) generally had 1100 cc 60 hp engines, and later became available with 1900 cc engines of about 100 hp. They were sold thru Buick dealers. By 1974 the Kadet had been replaced by the Manta with the same 1900cc engine and also by then quite a good car that developed a deserved reputation on the autocross circuits. The Manta a genuinely fine automobile in its time. Soon after that though the German Opel fell victim to the depreciating dollar, GM/Buick went to Japan, and it became a relabelled Isuzu. Adam Opel AG remains a vibrant and well respected European mfgr. to this day and is the source for recent GM cars like the Sky/Solstice and Astra.
Worst 50? - my vote goes to that fish bowl on wheels - the Pacer.
#46 of 298
Another Malcolm Bricklin Worst Car Contender by lokki
Nov 18, 2008 (10:53 am)
Reply
The Subaru 360 - Brought here by Malcom, and sold (at least in my home town) at Department Stores. Cheap? You betcha! Deathtrap? You betcha! Right after I'd gawked at one at the Millers Department Store, I saw one on the local news that evening! It was underneath a Chevy Caprice.
 
http://www.microcarmuseum.com/tour/subaru360.html
#47 of 298
Re: Chrysler/DeSoto Airflow [Mr_Shiftright] by grbeck
Nov 18, 2008 (11:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 13, 2008 1:03 pm)

Mr. Shiftright: The author seems to be leaning toward the cars' effect on automotive history. In that sense the Vega was rather meaningless...
 
I would disagree with that assessment. The Vega was a MAJOR flop and a big black eye not just for GM, but the entire American automobile industry.
 
It probably did as much to help Toyota gain a foothold in the American market as Toyota ever did for itself.
 
The Vega was initially announced with a gread deal of fanfare in 1968 by GM's top management as the American car that would beat the foreigners. Unfortunately, the car's design, execution and production were one disaster after another. The car was a huge disappointment at the time, and revealed that all was not well within GM.
 
The scary part is that when I hear the ballyhoo surrounding the Volt, and read the chapter in John DeLorean's book On a Clear Day You Can See General Motors devoted to the Vega, I get this nagging sense of deja vu...
 
I don't think that the General has yet learned its lesson...

Messages Page 5 of 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
30
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement