Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Classic Cars 50 Worst Cars of All Time
298 messages, Last post on May 11, 2009 at 1:53 PM
You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright
|
Replying to: toomanyfumes (May 06, 2009 3:58 pm) |
|
was a 1997 Neon. We ended up selling it for $150 one day when it had 215,000 miles on it. Regular oil changes and belt changes, never had a single problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ace3587 (May 09, 2009 6:03 am) 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (May 09, 2009 6:11 am) |
|
|
|
|
I can't believe the "Thing" missed this list. What a mess. I have a hard time believing it passed highway safety tests and was allowed out on the roads. Also, the Isuzu Amigo is not on the list. It may have been ok mechanically, but looked awful. The final straw was the commercial jingle. One vehicle that was killed by its advertising. I don't like the Honda Ridgeline because it reminds me of the Amigo.
|
|
|
Replying to: letsgetmikey (May 09, 2009 10:13 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: andys120 (May 09, 2009 10:53 am) Not sure why motorcycles don't suffer the same fate, but apparently Harley can make a motorcycle as bad as the worst American cars, but get away with it for decades. Which leads me to conclude that some of the "worst" cars are as much about marketing failure as about mechanical failure. Harley Davidson is a marketing superstar.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dave8697 (May 08, 2009 7:31 pm) Did you expect them to make the car like new? This car sounds rougher than a night in jial as a result of neglect and lack of attention. And, no, it didn't sell for anywhere 20,000 in 1998.
|
|
|
Replying to: isellhondas (May 09, 2009 1:19 pm)
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Classic Cars 50 Worst Cars of All Time
