Sign In Join 



50 Worst Cars of All Time

298 messages,  Last post on May 11, 2009 at 1:53 PM

You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Automotive News, Classic Cars, Coupe, Convertible, Truck, Sedan, Wagon


Messages Page 16 of 31
1
...
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
...
31
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#147 of 298
Re: Funny thing about the Chevette... [andre1969] by uplanderguy
Dec 06, 2008 (4:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 14, 2008 9:41 am)

My wife had a '78 Chevette 4-door, 4-speed when I married her in 1989. It had well over 100K miles, body wasn't too bad, but it smelled like gasoline inside all the time. I bought her a new 1990 Corsica 5-speed and she was like a kid at Christmastime! Got 108K troublefree miles out of that car.
 
I never heard of anything specifically chronic wrong with Chevettes, but being from a Chevy family at the time, I'd have definitely taken a 1976 or 1977 Vega (notice the years, they were improved from earlier ones) over a new Chevette at the time. I still like Vega wagons. I think with common-sense maintenance, a later Vega would probably have lasted as long as a Chevette (is that a good thing?!)
 
Bill
#148 of 298
Re: Funny thing about the Chevette... [andre1969] (uplanderguy) by hpmctorque
Dec 06, 2008 (5:38 am)
Reply
I've also heard of Chevettes going over 100,000, on the original drivetrain. And you're correct, as I wrote in an earlier message, uplanderguy, that the '76 and '77 Vegas were significantly improved over the '71-'74, at least. I'm not sure whether the improvements to which we're referring were in the '75 model year or the '76, but they included inner fenders for rust protection and steel cylinder linings.
 
It may be one for the records, but a member of my family coaxed a '73 Vega just over 100,000 miles on the original engine. He had to replace something in the cylinder head (can't remember what exactly), and it was a total rust bucket when the engine totally died between 100,000 and 101,000, but it managed to cross the milestone mileage figure.
#149 of 298
Re: Funny thing about the Chevette... [andre1969] (uplanderguy) by hpmctorque
Dec 06, 2008 (5:56 am)
Reply
For all their issues, I think that Pintos (the ones that didn't get rear ended) and even Gremlins were more durable than Vegas. Of course, that's feint praise.
 
Although the Gremlin was plagued by a variety of gremlins, the AMC I-6 engine that was used in these cars was good for its day. In fact, I think that engine was the same one which later earned an excellent reputation in Jeeps. I think that AMC engine was finally replaced by a V6 in Jeeps for the '06 model year. From what I've read the I-6 was a better engine than the newer V6, in terms of fuel economy and smoothness, and maybe torque also.
#150 of 298
Re: Funny thing about the Chevette... [andre1969] (uplanderguy) by hpmctorque
Dec 06, 2008 (6:14 am)
Reply
I should mention that my message #148 was intended to chronicle some anomalies, rather than to defend Vegas and Chevettes.
#151 of 298
Re: Funny thing about the Chevette... [andre1969] (uplanderguy) [hpmctorque by andre1969
Dec 06, 2008 (7:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (Dec 06, 2008 6:14 am)

Oh I'm sure we all have anomaly stories like that! I knew a guy, from one of my Mopar clubs, who back in the day had a Pinto and a Vega! Both of them made it to around 100,000 miles. The Pinto never had any significant problems. The Vega needed to have one cylinder sleeved, around 80,000 miles I think, but he talked about it like that was no big deal. I wonder how much something like that would cost?
 
I don't personally know anybody who's kept a Chevette long-term. I was always under the impression that it was one of those cars that helped spawn that "GM cars run bad longer than most cars run at all" line.
#152 of 298
Re: Funny thing about the Chevette... [andre1969] (uplanderguy) [hpmctorque [andre1969] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Dec 06, 2008 (7:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Dec 06, 2008 7:16 am)

Sure you'll find exceptions. Every now and then someone slips off a ten story roof and falls into a passing flatbed truck filled with mattresses---but that's a database of ONE!
 
My definition of a "worst car" would be something like this:
 
A car that has one or more serious inherent faults that will cripple 25% or more of the units manufactured within the first year of operation
 
So for instance if you take a Saab 900 Turbo, with a pretty well documented head gasket failure rate of around 9%, that ain't great but that doesn't make it one of the world's worst cars. But if you take a Maserati Bi-Turbo, where you could hardly find one that hasn't had an engine rebuild, (or multiple engine rebuilds), that's pretty bad.
#153 of 298
Re: Funny thing about the Chevette... [andre1969] (uplanderguy) [hpmctorque [andre1969] [Mr_Shiftright] by bhill2
Dec 09, 2008 (1:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 06, 2008 7:27 am)

My definition of a "worst car" would be something like this:
  
A car that has one or more serious inherent faults that will cripple 25% or more of the units manufactured within the first year of operation

 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
 
So I have to ask, Shifty. Was the Chevette a "worst car" by that definition? I always had the the impression that it was a crying shame as a car, but was reasonably reliable.
#154 of 298
Re: Funny thing about the Chevette... [andre1969] (uplanderguy) [hpmctorque [andre1969] [Mr_Shiftright] [bhill2] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Dec 09, 2008 (4:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bhill2 (Dec 09, 2008 1:09 pm)

Good point! I think in the case of the Chevette, the entire automobile was a "fault". I doubt one of them could go one year without having to repair it and worse yet, the next failure would be something different.
 
It takes as much genius to make a car completely bad as it does to make it completely good I think.
#155 of 298
Re: Funny thing...[andre1969](uplanderguy)[bhill2](Mr_Shiftright) by hpmctorque
Dec 10, 2008 (9:24 am)
Reply
"It takes as much genius to make a car completely bad as it does to make it completely good I think."
 
I know what you're trying to say, shifty, since the cars that are "completely" bad or good are statistical outliers, but I don't think your statement is correct.
#156 of 298
Re: Funny thing...[andre1969](uplanderguy)[bhill2](Mr_Shiftright) [hpmctorque] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Dec 10, 2008 (11:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (Dec 10, 2008 9:24 am)

I guess what I mean is that a car that does absolutely nothing well should be placed on a Worst Cars list by default.

Messages Page 16 of 31
1
...
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
...
31
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement