Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Classic Cars 50 Worst Cars of All Time
298 messages, Last post on May 11, 2009 at 1:53 PM
You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright
|
Replying to: boomchek (Nov 29, 2008 5:55 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: texases (Nov 29, 2008 6:01 pm) 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: boomchek (Dec 01, 2008 10:36 am) |
|
|
The problem is your attitude Exactly! I was once complaining about a problem with my Acura Integra, and my friend said, "What do you expect, Lokki? Of course you're going to have problems. It's just a cheap little car. They all have problems." Silly me. Expecting better.
|
|
|
Replying to: lokki (Dec 01, 2008 11:24 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: lokki (Dec 01, 2008 11:24 am) |
|
|
|
|
"In all seriousness, I would rate a Trabant higher than a Chevette." An objective comparison (considering only the attributes and deficiencies, and not assigning any value to the historical significance of the Trabant) would have to put the Trabant below the Chevette.
|
|
|
Replying to: hpmctorque (Dec 01, 2008 8:35 pm) It had a steel monococque frame at a time when most cars used body-frame construction. The roof, doors and fenders were of Duroplast, a plastic at when only Corvettes used non-metal body panels and it was driven by the front wheels when only Saab and Citroen were using FWD. Unfortunately the design didn't change during the 40 years of production so it was completely obsolete by then but then again so was the VW Type 1 (Beetle). The Chevette OTOH was obsolescent the day the first was made.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: andys120 (Dec 02, 2008 7:02 am) 
|
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 02, 2008 9:46 am) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Classic Cars 50 Worst Cars of All Time
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
