Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Classic Cars 50 Worst Cars of All Time
298 messages, Last post on May 11, 2009 at 1:53 PM
You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright
|
Replying to: jj2me (Nov 25, 2008 1:14 pm) I remember the early price leader Chevettes (from ym old car magazines) didn't even come with a back seatr, it was optional!! I guess it'd be a good car for pizza deliveries and parts drivers.
|
|
|
Replying to: boomchek (Nov 25, 2008 1:40 pm) Wasn't that one called the "Scooter"? Or something like that 
|
|
|
Replying to: texases (Nov 29, 2008 3:37 pm) 
|
|
|
Replying to: boomchek (Nov 29, 2008 5:55 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: texases (Nov 29, 2008 6:01 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: boomchek (Dec 01, 2008 10:36 am) |
|
|
The problem is your attitude Exactly! I was once complaining about a problem with my Acura Integra, and my friend said, "What do you expect, Lokki? Of course you're going to have problems. It's just a cheap little car. They all have problems." Silly me. Expecting better.
|
|
|
Replying to: lokki (Dec 01, 2008 11:24 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: lokki (Dec 01, 2008 11:24 am) |
|
|
|
|
"In all seriousness, I would rate a Trabant higher than a Chevette." An objective comparison (considering only the attributes and deficiencies, and not assigning any value to the historical significance of the Trabant) would have to put the Trabant below the Chevette.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Classic Cars 50 Worst Cars of All Time
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
