Sign In Join


What if you were in charge of GM?

724 messages,  Last post on Jul 04, 2009 at 7:22 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News, Classic Cars, Concept Cars, Future Vehicle


Messages Page 11 of 74
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
...
74
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#93 of 724
What If... by jchan2
Nov 29, 2008 (10:06 pm)
Reply
GM took the Saab and Saturn brands and sold them together as a package- the dealer networks of the 2 are pretty complimentary, and the two brands could have some degree of economies of scale as an independent entity.
 
GM could even do an IPO, spin off the two brands, and retain maybe 33% in the new company. Then again, an IPO in this market is the kiss of death.
 
Saab and Saturn were the last two to be integrated into GM- wouldn't this also mean that they would be the easiest to divorce from GM?
 
The complication here is so many Saab dealers have become Cadillac-Hummer-Saab...
#94 of 724
Re: cross-posted brand cutting [fezo] by bpizzuti
Nov 30, 2008 (5:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Nov 29, 2008 3:46 pm)

That's because Ford was actually SMART, and is already mid-way through their plan...not like they needed to come up with anything new for Congress, just go over the plan that's already in progress. Remember, Ford already had started to turn the company around and made a profit earlier this year before the recession hit. They just don't want to derail the current master plan, which just happens to be working. They even managed to secure credit, and may not need a bailout (not that they'd be dumb enough to turn money down if it was offered, of course).
 
As for GM...my master plan for them is to get out of the car business, buy the rest of GMAC, become a bank holding company in order to get Fed loans, and become a successful mortgage originator and automotive financing company...they can finance and lease Ford vehicles.
#95 of 724
Re: cross-posted brand cutting [bpizzuti] by gagrice
Nov 30, 2008 (7:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: bpizzuti (Nov 30, 2008 5:42 am)

As for GM...my master plan for them is to get out of the car business, buy the rest of GMAC
 
That is a good idea. Sadly it looks like Cerberus is the one that will pull it off. Cerberus wants the remaining part of GMAC in return for what is left of Chrysler. GM management is dumb enough to fall for it. They did sell 51% of GMAC that is partially responsible for their current condition. GM is the next Enron from where I am sitting. Wagoner and company should be tried for fraud in taking $millions while the company was losing $billions.
#96 of 724
Re: cross-posted brand cutting [nippononly] by cooterbfd
Nov 30, 2008 (10:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Nov 29, 2008 9:57 pm)

See, I'd agree that selling the divisions makes sense, except for one important thing, the buzzards that want them are waiting for the animal to die first.
#97 of 724
Re: cross-posted brand cutting [cooterbfd] by fezo
Nov 30, 2008 (2:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Nov 30, 2008 10:23 am)

Yeah, that and if you sell a division to someone who is going to actually make the car? I mean Saab has its own plants for the most part but Saturn and Pontiacs are made at regular GM plants.
#98 of 724
Re: cross-posted brand cutting [fezo] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Nov 30, 2008 (7:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Nov 30, 2008 2:51 pm)

Unlike some types of manufacturing, downsizing in the auto industry is enormously expensive. We think of it as "cost-saving" but initially it is "cost-producing". Any kind of panic-slashing may turn out to be the last nail in the coffin. As evidence of the irony of downsizing, consider in automotive history that the last cars produced by dying companies were often among their most magnificent efforts. (Auburn, Pierce-Arrow, '56 Packard, Studebaker Avanti). They had talent and engineering and even factories, but no capital.
#99 of 724
Re: cross-posted brand cutting [Mr_Shiftright] by gagrice
Nov 30, 2008 (7:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 30, 2008 7:16 pm)

They had talent and engineering and even factories, but no capital.
 
Sounds like GM. Let em die before we waste $Billions trying to resuscitate them.
#100 of 724
Re: cross-posted brand cutting [Mr_Shiftright] by dtownfb
Dec 01, 2008 (7:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 30, 2008 7:16 pm)

Absolutely correct about the cost of reducing being high but this where you ask the government to help with the "bridge" loan. Develop a consolidation plan that creates a viable company that can be profitable with US sales at 12 million. Then you ask the government to help fund this plan since you will need cash to buy out dealers, suppliers, etc.
#101 of 724
Re: cross-posted brand cutting [dtownfb] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Dec 01, 2008 (9:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: dtownfb (Dec 01, 2008 7:59 am)

Question is: (to which I don't know the answer)....is GM a viable business or is it, as Thenation.com recently said about AIG and Citigroug.....an "insolvent mastodon"?
#102 of 724
Re: cross-posted brand cutting [Mr_Shiftright] by dtownfb
Dec 01, 2008 (11:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 01, 2008 9:37 am)

In it's present form, no GM is not a viable company. I don't believe the current management can turn it around either. As i posted on the other GM news forum, they need to change their business model so that they build cars based on demand not capacity. Their current contracts with the UAW and suppliers prohibit this. Even with shutting down plants, they still are on the hook to pay the workers and suppliers for cars and trucks that are not being produced. Couple this with the rebates they need to offer to move their car, I can't see how they can make any money in the foreseeable future no matter how many cars are sold in the US.
 
The bigger problem is the top management at GM either doesn't see this, believe what they have done is enough or realize it but feel handcuffed by their investors. Either way, the top management at GM has been a major disappointment and must go. They were unable to make this company profitable during easy credit and record sales. How the heck can they make a profit in these market conditions???
 
I feel bad for the workers but they also had to know that GM's business model was unsustainable. it's not like this was a mom and pop operation where only 2 or 3 people knew the condition of the company. This is a publicly traded company that has to report it's earnings every quarter. Since the second half of 2004, GM has been losing money. Everyone knows that at some point the reserves are going to run, don't they? If, When, GM declares bankruptcy, the UAW has to shoulder some of the blame although management should never agree to labor contracts they know they can't pay.

Messages Page 11 of 74
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
...
74
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement