You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
What if you were in charge of GM?

874 messages, Last post on Oct 28, 2009 at 10:20 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: cooterbfd (Jun 29, 2009 6:03 pm) I never see ads from other highline makers touting loyalty discounts, and fans of those brands never brag about getting employee discounts when purchasing. It's a negative image factor, and GM needs to admit it.
|
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Jun 29, 2009 6:22 pm) And a car like the CTS can change that image. You also bring up a good point.....sweetheart lease deals. That's how the Germans get people into their cars, while GM uses incentives. Either way, they are getting the payment down to something (relatively) affordable, and that is what seals the deal.
|
|
|
Replying to: cooterbfd (Jun 29, 2009 6:37 pm) The CTS is indeed the car that can change that image, but the marketing and pricing strategy isn't perfect yet. I remember seeing loaded 50K CTS at my local dealer too...a lot of car, but it's going to be tough making a conquest sale at that level.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: blckislandguy (Jun 29, 2009 6:15 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Jun 29, 2009 7:15 pm) And as the original poster stated, it's hard to justify spending $50K for a vehicle when you have essentially the same vehicle that is a year older (or less) sitting next to it for roughly HALF the price. Add to that it's bigger brother selling for less cash, again only a year or slightly less older. What message does that send to a potential buyer? Having driven and spent considerable time in a CTS, no way would I pay $50K for one; heck I wouldn't pay $40K. |
|
|
Replying to: cooterbfd (Jun 29, 2009 6:37 pm) The problem is that lease costs are a function of depreciation, and a GM car which is much cheaper is likely to cost as much on lease. Why lease a GM for $x when you can lease a German or Japanese car worth $10K more for the same $x? GM is cheaper in cost to procure which is why they have sales deals. They are more expensive in depreciation which is why it is so tough for them to have sweetheart leases.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: tlong (Jun 30, 2009 1:58 pm) Just TRY and interpret a lease agreement in every detail. It's easier to buy a house.
|
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jun 30, 2009 3:57 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: fezo (Jun 30, 2009 4:01 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jun 30, 2009 3:57 pm) Have you comparison shopped mattresses? Look at buying computers for the home. All kinds of combinations of CPUs, memory, motherboard speeds and capabilities, drives, et al. It's impossible to compare real quality and value from brand to brand. And then there are the closeout, reduced prices on the computers but those are models that may be 2 months old and aren't the latest and greatest in the eyes of the afficianados, therefore they have slightly reduced pricing and are actually much better values than the latest and greatest. But this is really sounding like car buying, isn't it. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
What if you were in charge of GM?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats