You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
What if you were in charge of GM?

874 messages, Last post on Oct 28, 2009 at 10:20 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: cooterbfd (Jun 29, 2009 1:31 pm) If one is going to spend 40-50K and cry about premium fuel, they can't truly afford the car to begin with Can GM prices ever be mentioned without some big incentive scheme? Loyalty this, employee pricing that. If I was in charge of GM I'd dump all of that garbage. Just price the things. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Jun 29, 2009 5:16 pm) When the sleek Mercedes was relatively new, I saw an SLK-55 at the local Swifty gas station and the driver was putting in his own fuel. Really looked out-of-place. In this area Swifty is a chain with a reputation for buying junk fuel. That reputation may or may not be deserved today, but I rarely have bought at their station even if pricing is substantially lower than others in area because of it. I certainly wouldn't feed my Mercedes there. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Jun 29, 2009 5:16 pm) When the sleek Mercedes was relatively new, I saw an CLK-55 at the local Swifty gas station and the driver was putting in his own fuel. Really looked out-of-place. In this area Swifty is a chain with a reputation for buying junk fuel. That reputation may or may not be deserved today, but I rarely have bought at their station even if pricing is substantially lower than others in area because of it. I certainly wouldn't feed my Mercedes there.
|
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Jun 29, 2009 5:16 pm) I'll agree with the prestige factor, but the base C and 3 are not only smaller, but have much less powerful engines 228 and 230 respectively, as opposed to 263. And yes, the CTS starts at $36K, as opposed to $34K for the C and $33 and change for the 3. HOWEVER, when you bump up to the top of the line RWD versions, the CTS starts at $38,860 while the C jumps to $39K, and the 335 is over $40K. These versions give you the 300 (304 in the CTS) hp engines, except the C, which is 263. That levels the playing field some (although the 335 handles better due to it's smaller stature and pedigree. ".....Can GM prices ever be mentioned without some big incentive scheme? Loyalty this, employee pricing that. If I was in charge of GM I'd dump all of that garbage. Just price the things." I'll agree there too. Go to a Saturn style pricing, no haggle. (Or like their "Red Tag Sale") The price you see is the price you pay!!!
|
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Jun 29, 2009 5:22 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jun 27, 2009 3:07 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: blckislandguy (Jun 29, 2009 6:15 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: cooterbfd (Jun 29, 2009 6:03 pm) I never see ads from other highline makers touting loyalty discounts, and fans of those brands never brag about getting employee discounts when purchasing. It's a negative image factor, and GM needs to admit it.
|
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Jun 29, 2009 6:22 pm) And a car like the CTS can change that image. You also bring up a good point.....sweetheart lease deals. That's how the Germans get people into their cars, while GM uses incentives. Either way, they are getting the payment down to something (relatively) affordable, and that is what seals the deal.
|
|
|
Replying to: cooterbfd (Jun 29, 2009 6:37 pm) The CTS is indeed the car that can change that image, but the marketing and pricing strategy isn't perfect yet. I remember seeing loaded 50K CTS at my local dealer too...a lot of car, but it's going to be tough making a conquest sale at that level.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
What if you were in charge of GM?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats