Sign In Join 



What if you were in charge of GM?

874 messages,  Last post on Oct 28, 2009 at 10:20 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News, Classic Cars, Concept Cars, Future Vehicle


Messages Page 64 of 88
1
...
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
...
88
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#624 of 874
Radical Idea by sclarkemeister
Jun 25, 2009 (5:42 pm)
Reply
Based on the lack of quality of my 2002 Impala - latest failure is a blown head gasket at 50K - I have a suggestion. GM should stop concentrating on getting the headlights to turn on and off automatically and try building an engine that does not tear itself apart at 1/4 the mileage it should attain.
#625 of 874
Re: Radical Idea [sclarkemeister] by tlong
Jun 25, 2009 (7:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sclarkemeister (Jun 25, 2009 5:42 pm)

Based on the lack of quality of my 2002 Impala - latest failure is a blown head gasket at 50K - I have a suggestion. GM should stop concentrating on getting the headlights to turn on and off automatically and try building an engine that does not tear itself apart at 1/4 the mileage it should attain.
 
Good point. I would get some strategy. No dilution due to branding. No dilution due to 3 kinds of hybrids, all worse than the Prius. Instead of diluting with rebadges, stay focused. GM's history is the history of multiplying mediocrity. Contrast that with Honda - stay smaller, focus, don't try to be everything to everybody, focus on quality (although I think they are struggling a bit with that of late).
 
So for GM,
 
0 - get a strategy. Focus!
1 - they should dump Buick everywhere except China
2 - they should only sell commercial trucks at GMC. No overlaps with Chevy or Buick
3 - as mentioned above, REALLY focus on a few great engines. Focus on a high quality interior. Focus on refined controls. Focus on reliability. Keep improving the cars through a monitoring program - anything that fails early or reliably, fix the part and apply it to the production models.
#626 of 874
Re: Lets Answer the Question, Not Discuss Tranny Speeds [blckislandguy] by TIMGT5
Jun 26, 2009 (1:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: blckislandguy (Jun 25, 2009 5:34 pm)

Guys, isn't part of the answer "better leadership, leading from the front, getting close to the customer, no more free cars (and car washes ) to the execs, everybody has to buy their own car from a dealer and have it dealer maintained, hire a more a diversified management staff, not just upper midwestern white guys, blowing up the management silos", etc.?
 
You raise a good point about leading by example here. I think to be honest Rick was more of a fall guy than anything else, a convient target of anger. Granted the jet thing was arrogant, but under his leadership GM did produce a larger array of more competative cars than they had previously (malibu, C6 Vette, CTS etc..) so he had at least pointed GM in right direction. GM was a huge ship and it takes a lot to turn it arround.
 
I want to give you a different take on the diverstiy issue you raised. One of GM's problems in the past is that too many people who get to the top of company are from finance and accounting. There need to be more people on the Board of Directors coming up from engineering. Every Honda President has been promoted from the engineering division and it shows in much of what they offer the customer.
#627 of 874
Re: Radical Idea [sclarkemeister] by colloquor
Jun 26, 2009 (5:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: sclarkemeister (Jun 25, 2009 5:42 pm)

They should also ban Dex-Cool as the anti-freeze/coolant used in GM vehicles, and use only G-05 type coolant (analogous to the Mercedes-Benz formulation). If you have aluminum alloy parts in your engine, and most engines are either totally aluminum-based now - or at the very least the cylinder heads - you want to use G-05 phosphate-free coolant. Take a look at any aluminum part, even the thermostat housing on an engine using Dex-Cool, or the old Prestone "Green Stuff." If you see a white oxide build up around the thermostat, you've got a problem.
 
Dex-Cool is most likely the cause of your head gasket failure, as well as many other documented cooling system failures in GM engines.
#628 of 874
Re: Revamping GM part 2 [imidazol97] by dtownfb
Jun 26, 2009 (9:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Jun 23, 2009 5:32 pm)

Nope! I was only interested in Buick sales as a whole not individual models. The fact that GM consciously reduced the number of vehicles in the Buick lineup is even more telling that they felt there was too little difference between the Century, LeSabre, Regal, Park Avenue, etc.
#629 of 874
Re: Revamping GM part 2 [cooterbfd] by dtownfb
Jun 26, 2009 (9:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Jun 24, 2009 1:26 pm)

By reducing Buick's models, they also reduced their visibility in the public's eye. I don't think Buick is going to ever reach 400k sales again. 200k is a stretch unless they dump a bunch into the rentals.
 
As was mentioned by another member, GM makes money in every market except the North American market. NO reason GM can't continue to sell Buicks in China. It's not like they have the same Buicks as we do.
#630 of 874
Re: Revamping GM part 2 [dtownfb] by lemko
Jun 26, 2009 (9:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: dtownfb (Jun 26, 2009 9:39 am)

I dunno. If the North American Buicks were as lavish as the Chinese ones, I think Buick would have a very strong presence. I saw pictures of what a Chinese LaCrosse looks like. Who the heck needs a Cadillac? The Chinese LaCrosse would shame a Lexus.
#631 of 874
Re: Must be best or else [colloquor] by dtownfb
Jun 26, 2009 (9:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: colloquor (Jun 25, 2009 5:05 am)

I've rented a few Saturn Aura which are the paternal twin to the Malibu. I was very disappointed with the fuel mileage. I expected better fuel economy from the 6 speed auto. It drove nice on the highway but reminded you it was a 4 cylinder in town with a bunch of excessive shifting and throttle lag. to be honest, most midsize, 4 cylinder cars behave this way driving around town.
#632 of 874
Re: Revamping GM part 2 [lemko] by dtownfb
Jun 26, 2009 (10:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Jun 26, 2009 9:43 am)

I asked this question a while ago (probably two years) when the D3 were beginning to have their problems and were contemplating bringing their overseas cars here to the US.
 
Why are the better cars for GM (and Ford) built for the overseas markets and not for the US?
 
Those Buicks should be here in the US
#633 of 874
If I was in charge of GM.... by michaell
Jun 26, 2009 (10:48 am)
Reply
I wouldn't partner with IKEA.
 
Something like this might happen:
 
See more Car Pictures at CarSpace.com">
 
Some assembly required -- makes you wonder how many flat packs it would take to get something like that home.
 
Yes, I know that's a VW Golf that is disassembled in the above picture. I'm just sayin'.

Messages Page 64 of 88
1
...
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
...
88
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement