Sign In Join 



What if you were in charge of GM?

874 messages,  Last post on Oct 28, 2009 at 10:20 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News, Classic Cars, Concept Cars, Future Vehicle


Messages Page 62 of 88
1
...
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
...
88
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#607 of 874
Re: Must be best or else [TIMGT5] by bpizzuti
Jun 25, 2009 (6:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: TIMGT5 (Jun 25, 2009 5:49 am)

I know a lot of GM fanboys who call "bias" at the slightest critical point a reviewer makes of their product.
 
Let's be frank: there are Honda fanboys, Toyota fanboys, Mazda fanboys (raises hand) etc who do the same thing.
 
As for my friends Lemko and imidazol97] if you two fellows truly believe that the Hydramtic 4 speed and the 3.8 pushrod engine are the pinnicle of human automotive engineering achievement, that GM cannot possibly improve its cars performance in any meaningful way, well I am not going to try to convince you otherwise.
 
Lemko understands reality, he just hates it, and misses his old Buicks. Personally, I think if he's feeling nostalgic, he should try a Mercury Grand Marquis and he'll feel right at home in his couch...er, car.
 
I don't know what's up with imidazol97, maybe he just loves GM. They HAVE built some good products, after all; the problem is that they've built a lot more BAD ones recently, and some really don't like to admit to that (including, unfortunately, GM itself).
 
Hey, at least 62vette isn't around anymore. Poor guy.
#608 of 874
Re: Must be best or else [TIMGT5] by lemko
Jun 25, 2009 (6:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: TIMGT5 (Jun 25, 2009 5:49 am)

I don't think they're the pinnacle of anything, but they work and they're reliable. The AK-47 is hardly the finest rifle ever made, but it's dependable. You can throw a handful of sand into the breech and it'll still fire whereas an M-16 would have to be thoroughly stripped and cleaned.
#609 of 874
Re: Must be best or else [bpizzuti] by lemko
Jun 25, 2009 (6:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: bpizzuti (Jun 25, 2009 6:00 am)

I guess I haven't told anybody yet. I do have a Mercury Grand Marquis LS. Eh, it kind of looks like a Buick from the front.
#610 of 874
Re: Must be best or else [lemko] by bpizzuti
Jun 25, 2009 (6:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Jun 25, 2009 6:04 am)

I guess I haven't told anybody yet. I do have a Mercury Grand Marquis LS. Eh, it kind of looks like a Buick from the front.
 
ROTFLMAO! I knew it!
#611 of 874
Re: Must be best or else [TIMGT5] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jun 25, 2009 (6:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: TIMGT5 (Jun 25, 2009 5:49 am)

It's fine if someone wants to label a magazine "biased" because they pan a GM car....but then don't EVER go quoting that same magazine when they praise a GM car. That is completely inconsistent with the accusation of bias.
 
The magazine people actually laugh when they are accused of "bias" or "taking bribes". Most of them are eager to see a domestic product trounce an expensive import because it makes great copy and guarantees a strong response.
 
It just doesn't happen very often.
 
I totally agree with a previous poster, that the Japanese "edge" is really about "doing their homework".
 
The Japanese have rarely (just once in a while) released a new model prematurely, with bugs. They usually "get it right the first time out".
 
GM seems to hire its customers to do the R&D for them.
#612 of 874
Re: Must be best or else [Mr_Shiftright] by lemko
Jun 25, 2009 (6:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jun 25, 2009 6:46 am)

I heard that what we consider a "new" Japanese model is actually several years old before it gets to the NA market. They work out all the bugs in their home market before releasing it here.
#613 of 874
Re: Must be best or else [lemko] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jun 25, 2009 (7:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Jun 25, 2009 6:50 am)

Good point but the Japanese are even less tolerant of fit and finish and reliability issues than we are. I'd imagine that a company in Japan would have to put out a pretty good product for the home market.
 
You remember how in the 1980s every US car had to be repainted in order to even sell in Japan (not that they sold very many, that's true).
#614 of 874
Re: Must be best or else [TIMGT5] by tlong
Jun 25, 2009 (10:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: TIMGT5 (Jun 24, 2009 1:36 pm)

TIMGT5 - you've been a great addition to this board and in particular your plans for GM are very well thought out. Thanks for contributing to the discourse!
 
Now that the compliment is out of the way I need to disagree with this comment:
 
What are going to do in the future when Hydrogen Fuel Cars become the norm?
 
I just don't see it. Hydrogen is a carrier of energy, not a fuel, as it does not exist pure in nature (at least on earth). To work on conversion you need an expensive infrastructure and that energy has to come from somewhere (fossil fuels, etc). Hydrogen also has low energy density relative to fossil fuels.
#615 of 874
Re: Must be best or else [imidazol97] by tlong
Jun 25, 2009 (10:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Jun 25, 2009 4:09 am)

Those would unbiased reviews rather than Road&Track, Car&Driver, Motorweek, who have an interest in cars that are race capable or are out of the price range or interest of 90% of the US car buyers.
 
Like Consumer Reports? They don't have an interest in race car driving, and have even given very good reviews to some GM vehicles. But they say that the cars that test well (CTS, Malibu, Acadia/etc.) have poor reliability and the cars that test more poorly in being up to date and refined have better reliability. GM has a ways to go and denying it won't save them. The market doesn't believe the products are there yet, certainly not enough to support even a 20% market share, which is why it has been declining for years. What we feel in this forum isn't going to change that.
#616 of 874
Re: Must be best or else [tlong] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jun 25, 2009 (10:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: tlong (Jun 25, 2009 10:37 am)

I wouldn't be so quick to discount "technological status" as a significant marketing factor.
 
In reality, perhaps there isn't much difference between a plain old iron pushrod engine under the hood, versus a shiny, alloy, twin-cam motor with fancy headers, but in "perception", one is more desirable to the buyer than the other.
 
Many car buyers in America are just like car buyers everywhere--they want "the next new thing".
 
I don't think GM has done a very good job of providing that.

Messages Page 62 of 88
1
...
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
...
88
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement