Sign In Join 



What if you were in charge of GM?

874 messages,  Last post on Oct 28, 2009 at 10:20 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Automotive News, Classic Cars, Concept Cars, Future Vehicle


Messages Page 21 of 89
1
...
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
...
89
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#192 of 874
Re: Ouch! [andre1969] by anythngbutgm
Jan 30, 2009 (4:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Jan 29, 2009 2:11 pm)

The L-series also used polymer body panels so that kept the weight WAY down. I had a coworker with an L200 Wagon that he leased when the car first came out. he raved about how quick the 6 cylinder was for about 4 months. Ended up ending the lease early due to numerous electircal problems and a transmission replacement that threw him over the edge.
 
Bought a Nissan Altima instead.
#193 of 874
Re: Ouch! [TIMGT5] by anythngbutgm
Jan 30, 2009 (5:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: TIMGT5 (Jan 30, 2009 1:32 am)

In my opinion if GM took the funds expended for the G6 and Aura and poured them instead into the Malibu, the 'Bu would be the clear top of the class in the family sedan division, it is pretty close to the class leaders as is.
 
What more could they have poured into the Malibu? I've driven all three and they all drive the same which is to be expected given the identical underpinnings. Out of all of them, the Aura had the best driving position and the interior was the least rental feeling. But none of them are anything sporty, except maybe the Aura with the bigger wheels and quicker steering that I was surprised about. They're all too big to be any fun though, same goes for the Accord and Camry btw. The only real blast to drive in the segment is the Mazda6 and maybe the Altima (this one you'll pay for in ride quality)
#194 of 874
Re: Ouch! [anythngbutgm] by bvdj84
Jan 30, 2009 (8:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: anythngbutgm (Jan 30, 2009 5:05 am)

Well, in my opinion, I am actually impressed with the new malibu. The loaded model looks amazing. Very classy. It could almost pass for not being a GM product. If it wasn't a GM product it would be in the run for something I would look at.
 
They haven't put any money into the G6, other than its refresh for 09 models. Which I believe was a waste of money, when they should either get rid of the car or re-do the whole car. It needs a make over, not a new gaudy bumper and mixed matched interior radio and dash. The Aura has some major potential, if they had just took it a bit further, it could keep up with the rest. I seriously was impressed when I saw it first come out. But, that WOW factor didn't last long. Its sorta blah. But, with that said, the Accord is also sorta casual. But, it can hold its own. You can get a base model Accord or civic, and still feel the engineering.
 
GM tries, they really do, but they put a car out, but its just half effort. If you are going to do it, then find out if you have the money to do it all the way. Its been said before, but if they downsized, get rid of the some of the duplicate SUV's, they could have some major money to really put some great quality in their new cars.
 
After driving my 08 G6, I have a rare version of it, it has the 4cyl, leather, roof, sound. I actually love it. I can see why people buy them, or GM cars, because GM really does think about what the driver wants with all the features. But, I think all those features sugar coat it. Without them, the car wouldn't be much. A G6 in a base model would not compare to a base model Accord, or civic. Its not like the engine is anything to really get excited about with its crazy picky transmission. Certainly not like my 06 Accord or 08 Jetta I have had. The new 6spd transmission probably fixed alot. I have not driven that yet. I plan to though. Just to compare.
 
So....lol... my relationship with GM is sorta like a love hate, I think I want to love them, because they have some major potential, but mad that I am supporting them now. I hope for us, that they do some major thinking, and show us what they have.
#195 of 874
Re: Ouch! [anythngbutgm] by TIMGT5
Feb 01, 2009 (4:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: anythngbutgm (Jan 30, 2009 5:05 am)

Of course also includes, exterior design and marketing budget as well. My point in saying this is that GM does not need 3 cars to in the camry/accord/altima marketplace, just one appliance type roomy family sedan.
 
I find it odd that of the three epsilon cars the Malibu gets really good reviews and ranks highly in CR while the Aura and G6 are heavily critized.
 
The platform has a lot of potential. I Believe that Chevy could do an "SS" type Mailbu with more aggressive throttle response, firmer suspension and 18 inch low profile tires, ground effects package, faux carbon fiber trim. This would be one for the TL/ BMW 3 Series wanabees.
 
There should be a Malibu coupe as well, to replace the G6 and take one the Altima 2 door and Accord 2 door. I believe that in the next few years that personal semi-luxury sporty coupes will become popular again.
 
The front drive Pontiacs are a waste of effort, all of the resources allocated for these cars should go to Chevrolet. In GM's lineup Chevy should be the Toyota/Honda/Ford/Nissan applinace fighter.
 
If Pontiac survives its best use would be niche outfit, with high performance RWD sedans, coupes and roadsters. If not then Pontiac should be dropped altogether. What is the point of it selling inferior versions of Chevy products?
#196 of 874
Re: Ouch! [TIMGT5] by bpizzuti
Feb 01, 2009 (6:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: TIMGT5 (Feb 01, 2009 4:02 am)

What is the point of it selling inferior versions of Chevy products?
 
The point is Buick/GMC dealers wanted "Chevys" to sell to their customers, but couldn't become a Chevy dealer, usually because there is already a Chevy dealer in close proximity.
#197 of 874
Re: Ouch! [bpizzuti] by TIMGT5
Feb 03, 2009 (1:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: bpizzuti (Feb 01, 2009 6:33 am)

It is that kind of nonsense that helped to get them into trouble in the first place. Your point in itself is right, I am critical of the actual practice. They may have gotten away with this back when the General had 40% plus market share but in these times some hard decisions have to be may made.
 
I think there really should be only 2 applications of the Epsilon chasis, one should be a "Joe Six Pack" version, The Malibu, this would be GM's Accord/Camry fighter. and an upscale version (Buick possibly) to take on the ES 350/ Acura TL. Any badging beyond that is a waste of resources.
 
Same thing with Lambda X-over, there is no need for 4 itenerations of this same car. Concentrate on 2, Drop the GMC and Saturn ( The brand is definately going anyway) Keep the Chevy version to go against the Pilot/Highlander/CX 9. An upscale version to go against the MDX/RX.
 
No company should produce products that compete with itself. GM needs only one model for each purpose, and to target each specific demographic. Eliminating excess duplication cuts costs. If GM is to survive it must shrink to fit the times.
#198 of 874
Re: Ouch! [TIMGT5] by imidazol97
Feb 03, 2009 (5:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: TIMGT5 (Feb 03, 2009 1:52 am)

Wouldn't that depend on the actual item and field. Are you saying a company packaging milk shouldn't package milk for stores to market under their own label--that's competing with the milk product originally listed.
 
Are you saying Toyo shouldn't market the Camry and the ES? They're essentially the same car. Honda shouldn't market the Civic and Accord with models parallel in the Acura line?
 
Are you saying Marathon shouldn't market Speedway gasoline? SuperAmerica gas?
#199 of 874
Re: Ouch! [imidazol97] by bpizzuti
Feb 03, 2009 (6:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Feb 03, 2009 5:49 am)

Are you saying Toyo shouldn't market the Camry and the ES? They're essentially the same car. Honda shouldn't market the Civic and Accord with models parallel in the Acura line?
 
In both cases, they may be the same platform, but they don't compete with each other directly. The Lexus/Acura versions are much higher trims, more expensive, with features not found on the "peon" version. That's like marketing an Enclave and a Traverse: they're in different price strata. While you really COULD get away with making them both trims of the same model (and they do in some countries), we Americans are snobs and our luxury cars must have different nameplates from the cars for the unwashed masses.
 
However, what difference is there between the Cobalt and the G5? Malibu and Aura? Equinox and Torrent? 99% of the time the only difference is sheetmetal and badge.
#200 of 874
Re: Ouch! [bpizzuti] by TIMGT5
Feb 03, 2009 (4:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bpizzuti (Feb 03, 2009 6:16 am)

You made my point brilliantly. The ES and Camry have a clear price hierachy with the Base ES starting 4K above the top-end Camry XLE, some thing with the TL, the base model starting at 4K above the Accord EX-VL Nav.
 
In the General's case there is too much price overlap in the Aura, G6 and Malibu, which actually dilutes the platform and is confusing to the customer. It has always been a flaw in GM's strategy not to specify its brands. Every brand trying to be everything to everybody does not work.
#201 of 874
Time for GM to Get Real by vinnyny
Feb 16, 2009 (9:39 am)
Reply
I've posted support for GM all over Edmunds, but I'm running out of gas. I buy lots of cars and have been trying to buy new GM products for years. Over the past four years, I have bought six cars. I always go to the domestic dealers first because I feel it is a patriotic duty to support our own AMERICAN companies. Unfortunately, of the six cars I've bought since 2005, only two have been American--a Corvette C6 convertible and a Pontiac G6.
 
When I was ready to trade my BMW, I tried to buy a Cadillac CTS but it would have cost me $5k more than the Mercedes C350 I ended up buying (and about $2k more than the BMW 335 I considered). The MB is smaller, but much more opulent. When I went to trade my 2006 Honda Odyssey for a 2007 GMC Acadia, I again found the difference to be about $5k (versus a loaded 2007 Odyssey Touring). So, although I really wanted the Acadia, I bought the Odyssey.
 
When GM's 0% financing came out again, the dealer from whom I bought the G6 called. I took the Odyssey up to the lot and found that loaded Acadias were now stickering near $50K! Are they nuts? I can buy a Mercedes ML350 and have enough left over to put 50% down on another G6 for my other kid! I actually felt bad for the salesman
 
Advice to GM? Try putting realistic prices on your Moroney sticker and reduce dependency on silly incentives. I'm not suggesting you use Saturn's "No negotiation" strategy, but you've got to realize that no sane person is going to pay $50K for an Acadia.

Messages Page 21 of 89
1
...
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
...
89
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement